<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for smileyfreak1981</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/smileyfreak1981/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/smileyfreak1981/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:50:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kandee Johnson: It's time for an "I love you!" Giveaway- with URBAN DECAY's hot new stuff!</title><link>http://www.kandeej.com/2011/08/its-time-for-i-love-you-giveaway-with.html#comment-294228138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like Rockstar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't have any Urban Decay pencils, but I want some.  I hope I win! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Facebook Comments is changing commenting on the Web</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2011/05/how-facebook-comments-is-changing-commenting-on-the-web/#comment-197828641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't like Facebook comments, and if that's the only way to comment on something I would have commented on, I won't comment. And I don't comment much as it is.  I like Disqus a million times better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly, I think it's want of ease on the part of site owners to use Facebook comments as pest control.  Haters and trolls can be useful if well managed, but it's going to take some time out of your day to do that effectively.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feds to Supreme Court: Allow Warrantless GPS Monitoring</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/04/scotus-gps-monitoring/#comment-187908730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And OnStar went into production BEFORE the government was a part owner in General Motors, who owns OnStar.  When OnStar first came out, they weren't sharing your location with the Fuzz without your knowledge, and without due process and without following the fourth amendment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Essential Facebook Etiquette: 10 Dos and Don&amp;#8217;ts</title><link>http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/facebook-etiquette/#comment-187898544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know some folks who need to read this...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Dept. to Congress: Don&amp;#8217;t Saddle 4th Amendment on Us</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/04/fourth-amendment-email-2/#comment-181030815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*yawn*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Dept. to Congress: Don&amp;#8217;t Saddle 4th Amendment on Us</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/04/fourth-amendment-email-2/#comment-181014424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Ben Franklin would have properly used "you're" instead of "your".  Fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Dept. to Congress: Don&amp;#8217;t Saddle 4th Amendment on Us</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/04/fourth-amendment-email-2/#comment-181004849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't making a "burden" for government the whole point of the fourth amendment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No burden on government is unnecessary when it involves my liberty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Government Wants to Control App Market</title><link>http://preview.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2382500,00.asp#comment-170477142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are these apps any different than me calling up Joe Blow who's on his way home from work and sayin' "Hey, Joe, don't go down 5th street, the cops have a road block there and it'll take you forever to get through." ??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, et. al. are ASSuming that everyone would use these apps for nefarious purposes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just another reason for me to loathe Harry Reid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Government Wants to Control App Market</title><link>http://preview.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2382500,00.asp#comment-170472292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn't read the article, did you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:10:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judge Lets Sony Unmask Visitors to PS3-Jailbreaking Site</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/03/geohot-site-unmasking/#comment-162061398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the author(s) of The Anarchist Cookbook are protected under the first amendment, how is Hotz not?  The web is a big publishing platform, and he published information.  Publishing information does not equal intent to commit a crime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The fact that a judge signed off on what amounts to illegal search and seizure is ridiculous. The civil court system is nothing but corrupt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:24:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Americans Want an Internet &amp;#039;Kill Switch&amp;#039; </title><link>http://www.securityweek.com/node/498#comment-90949648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;61% of Americans are, quite obviously, ignorant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: -mark lee. rocks.</title><link>http://marklee.tumblr.com/post/36803192#comment-612719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a good Methodist (who has spent this entire week at annual conference), I can appreciate this. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I tumble...</title><link>http://deedee.tumblr.com/post/35867529#comment-522954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aaaaannnnd....it's not updating the number of comments...hmm...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's really too late to be looking at code...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I tumble...</title><link>http://deedee.tumblr.com/post/35867529#comment-522952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently the comments link on my Tumblr blog homepage is blow'd up...but when you click thru to the actual post it's fine.  ???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smileyfreak1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:37:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>