<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sliderock</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sliderock/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sliderock/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:17:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://sliderock.tumblr.com/post/1375580677</title><link>http://sliderock.tumblr.com/post/1375580677#comment-89258169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Friday @ 5?  Nah, it's quittin' time!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sliderock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memory Dump @ Digital Brainwaves, Twitter Quitters Just Don't Get It - PC World</title><link>http://memorydump.digitalbrainwaves.com/post/102309646#comment-8901494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty close to a Twitter Quitter myself.  It's not that I don't get it, it's that I don't really like the format.  By following too many people, the feed became increasingly noisy (information overload).  Yes, TweetDeck is nice for arranging information into groups, but it's limited -- and I prefer my TweetDeck columns for search rather than for grouping people I alread follow.  Beyond that, conversation is very disjointed because Twitter lacks threaded comments.  I've been finding FriendFeed to be much more useful.  True, there's a smaller user community which possibly cuts down the signal to noise ratio, but so far I've found that the threaded comments lend a lot more context and relevance to the conversation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sliderock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>