<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of sidewind69</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sidewind69/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sidewind69/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:19:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart workers plan Black Friday walkout </title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/15/news/companies/walmart-black-friday/',%20711385994L)#comment-711385994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mor0n you totally missed the point.  We who DO NOT work at Walmart DO NOT WANT TO SUBSIDIZE WALMART'S PROFITS.  They need to pay a living wage or else WE CITIZENS foot the bill.  Seriously, you are WAAAAAY dumber than you think you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:20:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart workers plan Black Friday walkout </title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/15/news/companies/walmart-black-friday/',%20711386331L)#comment-711386331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, Rob, you must be pathetic in your life to have such a need to go to these threads to put Walmart workers down.  You are a sad, insecure, heartless loser.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:21:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: White House &amp;#8216;secede&amp;#8217; petitions reach 660,000 signatures, 50-state participation</title><link>(u'http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/14/white-house-secede-petitions-reach-660000-signatures-50-state-participation/',%20714201026L)#comment-714201026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You see a bogus election because that is what you WANT to see... nothing more.  No proof, no substance--just you wanting something to be.  It doesn't work that way, and some of you need to remember that you are AMERICANS first.  And again, PROOF or it's just your own delusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: White House &amp;#8216;secede&amp;#8217; petitions reach 660,000 signatures, 50-state participation</title><link>(u'http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/14/white-house-secede-petitions-reach-660000-signatures-50-state-participation/',%20714201646L)#comment-714201646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And they 'dislike' you post because it makes sense.  It's disgusting the HATE that has overtaken the intelligence of some Americans today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home building at highest level since '08 - Nov. 20, 2012</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/20/real_estate/home-building/',%20715355856L)#comment-715355856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's right--Republicans of late have been showing themselves exactly as he implied: happy when things are bad because it makes the president look bad.  It IS exactly as he said in reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home building at highest level since '08 - Nov. 20, 2012</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/20/real_estate/home-building/',%20715358640L)#comment-715358640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does what you said even mean, and how do you not know how lacking in substance your claim is when you have no explanation and no proof of this thing you made up??  Omg... it's so frustrating seeing such idi0cy due to hate clouding intelligence, and smugness to keep such people forever ignorant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home building at highest level since '08 - Nov. 20, 2012</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/20/real_estate/home-building/',%20715360178L)#comment-715360178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't even know what socialism is you ignorant slob.  Guh, we can see right through you and man it's just pathetic and sad...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:04:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall Street critic Elizabeth Warren to join Senate Banking Committee - Dec. 12, 2012</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2012/12/12/news/economy/warren-banking-committee/',%20734398992L)#comment-734398992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a cynical little rat we have in you. Easy to bet that you're middle-class or lower but with a big mouth and a chip on your shoulder. Sad...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:27:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921190281L)#comment-921190281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is going on all over the government.  Look at the pentagon, or contractor spending... no wait--we can't because those things are in the Republicans' pockets.  DUH.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921256398L)#comment-921256398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the funny thing is: the IRS is not a partisan entity and was being presided over by a BUSH APPOINTEE...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well guess what is happening now??  The Republicans are pushing this with the nuance being that it's an Obama problem when it isn't--and you mor0ns are eating it up.  Why?  That's where the BIGOTRY comes in.  In case you didn't know, BIGOTRY can come in many forms--political as well as racial.  Which one are you, as you certainly are one?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921281769L)#comment-921281769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's funny you think you're answering my post when you're just answering the small part that you want.  THE REPUBLICANS ARE PUSHING THIS AS AN OBAMA PROBLEM WHEN IT DOESN'T ADD UP.  The evidence IS WORSE than any circumstantial evidence anyone would bring up. HOWEVER, THEY WILL spend tons of money and in the end this will go away, EXCEPT for the seething hate and bigotry it spreads--as I mentioned before--some which I am I believe many others are tired of.  Ever heard of 'wagging the dog' -- that's what this is, along with 5 years of THIS ABSOLUTE GARBAGE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You think you're a researcher, and you think you're intelligent--WELL, you miss the point right in front of your face because your blinders have you seeing what you want to see ONLY.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921283372L)#comment-921283372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In short: You may 'research' but you don't realize that biased research and biased outlook make fore biased findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go look up circumstantial evidence to get an idea of where you are astray in your laughably smug 'research'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921286373L)#comment-921286373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because the Republicans have been on attack mode for over 5 years with little to show for it but a dysfunctional government and country--which they COULD HAVE CHANGED, but for their political games above all else.  They attack and won't EVER look into the wastes that occur on a far further basis, and they make us weaker by playing on the hate and bigotry of their base.  Attacks is all we get a little else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about Haliburton, huh?  It makes this scandal like .000001% of value.  But you don't see 'the other side' WASTING THIS MUCH TIME AND MONEY to score political points.  So IT DOES matter where the waste is quite simply.  It matters because THIS IS A WAG THE DOG GAME, and about 46% of the the country buys it for dubious reasoning (if the popular results of the last election any indication).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921336266L)#comment-921336266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go look-up bigotry in the dictionary, o ignorant one, and realize how little you really know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fill your head with knowledge, and then speak like you have something worthwhile to share.  What you can't even begin to grasp is that what you've written is barely cohesive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921365321L)#comment-921365321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might want to seriously rethink your analogy as it is pretty unrealistic, as well as being a very poor parallel, if you really thought about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem today is that people don't seem to THINK.  They often just parrot over and over.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921415190L)#comment-921415190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't make it about Dems/Reps -- THE REPS DID.  That's the whole point of my argument.  They are making nuances that it's the Obama administration's fault when the IRS and its leaders did it.  The nuances are to make really idi0tic,. ignorant, partisans foam at the mouth, and they will waste time and money using that leverage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did I spell it out for you??  Next time THINK.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Mr. Spock' in IRS video apologizes for 'embarrassing' mistake</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/congress-irs-waste/index.html',%20921517509L)#comment-921517509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be laughable that with your comprehension and writing skills that you would be making more than anyone here.  I love that 'handout' talk you've been taught and do parrot so well.  You almost certainly get more handouts than those you decry here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data surveillance in the U.S.: necessary or 'obscenely outrageous'?</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/07/politics/nsa-data-mining/index.html',%20922611465L)#comment-922611465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a good way to make sure terrorists don't blow the country to bits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NSA says data mining helped thwart terror</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/12/politics/nsa-terror-hearing/index.html',%20928376227L)#comment-928376227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is all political grandstanding risking us all getting blown the hell up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FBI director defends surveillance programs, clashes with legislator</title><link>(u'http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/13/politics/nsa-congress-mueller/index.html',%20929393360L)#comment-929393360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah and when we get blown up you'll all be screaming BLOODY MURDER at this administration (especially half of the American partisan zombies).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch files for divorce</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/13/news/rupert-murdoch-divorce/',%20929802999L)#comment-929802999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Candy is a moron.  Thanks for helping ruin the country, Candy, with your stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:14:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch files for divorce</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/13/news/rupert-murdoch-divorce/',%20929804274L)#comment-929804274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you definitely ARE a Republican.  We can tell by your cruddy 8th grade, or below, writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:15:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch files for divorce</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/13/news/rupert-murdoch-divorce/',%20929804992L)#comment-929804992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're obviously a partisan zombie who unintelligently tried to pass himself off as objective a couple of times, most pathetically.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch files for divorce</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/13/news/rupert-murdoch-divorce/',%20929805822L)#comment-929805822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for showing yourself to be the idi0t we see you and your ilk as =]...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch files for divorce</title><link>(u'http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/13/news/rupert-murdoch-divorce/',%20929807539L)#comment-929807539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No you aren't hahaha, you're a partisan zombie through-and-through.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've all been on these types of forums for a while--you simply think and write in the idi0tic way that is symbolic of what you are--and that is NOT an independent.  Stop being a pathetic poser and at least stand up for what you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RapidOne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:19:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>