<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for shjh2525</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/shjh2525/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/shjh2525/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:22:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: fixer upper</title><link>http://maximandblue.tumblr.com/post/178992446#comment-16876105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;max....max, max, max. apart from your stupendous attempt at over permeating every sentance with another adjective, there are some basic grammer issues that I think we should cover to enhance not only the ease of reading this paragraph but also to make the writing more attractive and flowing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Firstly: 'receptionists' should be receptionist's as the acrylic nails belong to her. Secondly: The first sentance does little to stir an emotive response from me so lets play around with it to make it a little better. 'The sounds of the office reflect the unhappy lives of the unmotivated, number crunching drones that work there; the whirr of the photocopy machine, the monotonous tapping of the receptionist's acrylic nails and the low hum of the air conditioning unit all linger in the stale office air.' I think that sounds quite a bit better...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could continue but for the sake of your temper, i shall desist. let this be a lesson so that i never have to pull you up on your writing again. I only do this because someone who chooses to have a blog should at least be able to express themselves in an according manner to the english language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;good day&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shjh2525</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>