<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for shivsingh</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/shivsingh/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/shivsingh/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:30:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My take on the Sprinklr acquisition of Dachis Group</title><link>http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2014/02/sprinklr-dachis-group.html#comment-1252661575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats and eloquently expressed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:30:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremiah&amp;#8217;s new venture; moving on from Altimeter</title><link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2013/09/18/jeremiahs-new-venture-moving-on-from-altimeter/#comment-1050124114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations! I'm thrilled for you. As always, you're better on the future and are going to take an industry and corporations along with you for the ride.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is really smart to acquire Bluefin Labs</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2013/02/twitter-is-really-smart-to-acq.php#comment-789374248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a really good question - what happens to the API. I assume they'll keep it open but there maybe questions on whether everyone gets equal access or not&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marissa Mayer &amp;amp; Yahoo. What's missing</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2012/07/stop-talking-about-marissa-may.php#comment-596442689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. Yes, I think some folks maybe undervaluing Marissa's experience and what she brings to the table.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl Digital Advertising Madness</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2012/02/super-bowl-digital-advertising.php#comment-426578727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, retro and nostalgia is very much in. Don't be surprised if you see that in one of our Pepsi ads...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:56:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Ads' New Digital Role, HBR Piece</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/11/tv-ads-new-digital-role-harvar.php#comment-371868789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Anne-Marie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Ads' New Digital Role</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/11/the_new_role_of_television_adv.html#comment-362610644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alex, there are lots of different factors that influence sales of our products from marketing campaigns, to distribution, pricing, promotions and what else our competitors maybe doing/spending in a given time period. It is never just one single factor or single campaign.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Ads' New Digital Role</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/11/the_new_role_of_television_adv.html#comment-362610055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that's an awesome point - we need to focus on understanding the rhythms of people's behavior during different programming. I couldn't agree more and we're just beginning to really understand those differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Ads' New Digital Role</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/11/the_new_role_of_television_adv.html#comment-362609685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with that Stephanie, but I'd add that a brand can get greater value out of the ad when it thinks about it as part of a broader consumer engagement ecosystem&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+ The Real-Time Marketing Promise</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/08/having-played-around-with-goog.php#comment-274727072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny and ironic. You're right, maybe I need to add that functionality to the blog. Otherwise, I'm not true to the Google+ story&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:05:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When a trillion impressions aren't enough</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/07/a-trillion-impressions-never-e.php#comment-265345413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, that's the hardest question. If I like something, it doesn't necessarily mean that I'm a buyer by any means.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When a trillion impressions aren't enough</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/07/a-trillion-impressions-never-e.php#comment-265344519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, there's no question that measurement has to catch up a bit which is understandable given the pace of technological change. Two years ago I wouldn't be thinking about a FourSquare check-in&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:40:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When a trillion impressions aren't enough</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/07/a-trillion-impressions-never-e.php#comment-265343149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Jason. You're right that the challenges are political but I'd suggest that the math isn't perfect idea. With regards to Pepsi specifically, that's exactly what I'm solving for at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do \$185,000 Domain Names make sense?</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/06/do-185000-domain-names-make-se.php#comment-238059983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure. It gets more confusing when you think about brand hierarchies as well. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do \$185,000 Domain Names make sense?</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/06/do-185000-domain-names-make-se.php#comment-237918172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With categories like movies or cars I can see this potentially working but  for brands I really wonder. Even with categories, it would need to be managed by some impartial authority&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do \$185,000 Domain Names make sense?</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/06/do-185000-domain-names-make-se.php#comment-237917806</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right. And a lot of brands will underestimate the cost and skillset required to manage a gTLD. It seems ICAAN hasn't thought this through&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staking everything in Real-Time Marketing</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/06/a-career-in-real-time-marketin.php#comment-223299437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Justin. It totally gets even more interesting with location based services, gamification and addressable TV.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staking everything in Real-Time Marketing</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/06/a-career-in-real-time-marketin.php#comment-223298630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, David. You're right, branded content comes alive through the other dimensions of real-time marketing&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:39:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Vending, TV Ad Tagging &amp;amp; Marketing Convergence</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/04/digital-innovation-philosophie.php#comment-195010969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stephane, thanks for your thoughts. I completely agree qualitative metrics are more important than quantitative ones today&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 00:28:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will you tie bonuses to Facebook fan counts?</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/04/tie-corporate-bonuses-to-faceb.php#comment-192120767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Glen. The Facebook ad units are very powerful for marketers but using them for just acquiring likes can be limiting at times&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will you tie bonuses to Facebook fan counts?</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/04/tie-corporate-bonuses-to-faceb.php#comment-192120195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Scott. You're right its a credit to FB in how they prioritize our newsfeeds to only display what we really care about&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another reason why Facebook is changing marketing in profound ways</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/03/one-more-reason-why-facebook-i.php#comment-173423574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that's fair to say that I had Fortune 500 markters in mind when I wrote that post. However, it gets all the more important with small business marketers for whom Facebook is an even bigger part of their marketing ecosystem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another reason why Facebook is changing marketing in profound ways</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/03/one-more-reason-why-facebook-i.php#comment-173422917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said. When it comes to brands they have to do personal marketing on a one on one level too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:53:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making a Splash in Digital, Forbes Interview</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2011/01/making-a-splash-in-digital-for.php#comment-129846890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point. I think there's a legacy bias in all of us. But I'd also suggest that its actually a little different to a medium thing and more a matter that some magazines carry a lot of weight and credibility. The fact that they're magazines should be secondary, though that's probably not always the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:30:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Digital Marketing Industry Pet Peeves of 2010</title><link>http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2010/12/my-10-digital-pet-peeves-of-20.php#comment-107936400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lee, great point. I couldn't agree more that creative doesn't get enough attention either. It's a unique type of creative that is often ignored or not thought through enough given the nuances of the platform&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shiv Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:27:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>