<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sherriann</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sherriann/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sherriann/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:36:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mullen Creative Director Can't See the Glass for the Door - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/ha/mullen_creative_director_cant_see_the_glass_for_the_door_153228.asp#comment-36491396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me say it another way.  God is Vac.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mullen Creative Director Can't See the Glass for the Door - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/ha/mullen_creative_director_cant_see_the_glass_for_the_door_153228.asp#comment-36489771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vac is god.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: pissing in the wind</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2010/01/running-on-empty.html#comment-29852030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As an agency producer I like to think I 'work' with reps to decide which directors are right for a project based on genre, availability, budget, personality, etc. I don't like to think that I am being ''worked' by them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: consensus sells</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2009/09/consensus-sells.html#comment-16814122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"When creative directors are unable to get the directors they want because production companies won't allow access to talent unless they receive fair payment terms things will change fast".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am waiting for that day and really, really looking forward to it.  I hope it comes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I fear that someone will always agree to these absolute bullshit payment terms in order to get the work and undercut competitors, though. Even the companies that have great talent.  I hope it doesn't happen, but I see it already is.  Production companies are not banks, and clients that treat them as such without paying any interest on the loan need to stop.  How is it not illegal?  I am hoping that ECD's can help, as you mentioned above,  but it will only work if all Prod Co's stick to their guns and say no.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: laws of gravity, part 2</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2009/09/laws-of-gravity-part-2.html#comment-16375869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the thing that also surprised me is that they would bid more than one director on a job with so many limitations and tims constraints,etc.  Surely if there is a reason to single bid a job that is it!  Look, I know things are changing due to the economy, and in a lot of ways I think inflated production budgets, markups and costs/fees are coming into line, but at the same time that doesn't mean that people should be taken advantage of.  The fact that someone will always do it cheaper is a shitty axe we have hanging over our heads.  For the first time in my life I truly understand union mentality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: laws of gravity, part 2</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2009/09/laws-of-gravity-part-2.html#comment-16304466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saying no was the best thing you could have done.  I was holding my breath while reading this, hoping you &lt;br&gt;weren't going to play ball.  As a freelance producer I have recently had to cut my rate because someone will always go lower than me as the market is now saturated with people desperate for work. When do I cut bait?  When do I say 'no'? If the work is great then I will usually make an exception, but it's like the wild, wild west out there right now.  No rules apply.  I applaud your saying 'no'.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the art of the pass</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2009/07/the-art-of-the-pass.html#comment-12714598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cheri I love your comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the art of the pass</title><link>http://producerposts.com/producer_posts/2009/07/the-art-of-the-pass.html#comment-12694644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I always try to be honest with reps and, if it is the case,  thank them for the reels but tell them that their director(s) are not right for my project.  In return, if they are honest and tell me that a director doesn't see him or her self doing this project (passing) then it shouldn't be a difficult conversation at all.  I thank them for looking at the boards and move on to the next.  I would never vilify a rep if one of their directors passed on my job.  There is a lot of good talent out there and someone else will be available and interested.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sherriann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>