<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sheilaandersonrealtor</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sheilaandersonrealtor/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sheilaandersonrealtor/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:08:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Monroe landowners plead property tax case to Justices | West Virginia Record</title><link>http://www.wvrecord.com/news/221049-monroe-landowners-plead-property-tax-case-to-justices#comment-16415614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ooops - correction. The style should be Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Company vs. Webster County.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sheilaandersonrealtor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monroe landowners plead property tax case to Justices | West Virginia Record</title><link>http://www.wvrecord.com/news/221049-monroe-landowners-plead-property-tax-case-to-justices#comment-16415588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't West Virginia the place that led to the US Supreme Court decision - Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Company vs. West Virginia? And wasn't that decision all about equal protection? The plain English suggested that raising the adjacent assessment was not a remedy for the harm caused by the disparity. So, given the federal perspective, why are these judges are asking questions which suggest there was no historical perspective?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sheilaandersonrealtor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>