<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sgrove</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sgrove/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sgrove/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:13:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How I Hacked Into TechStars</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/how-i-hacked-into-techstars/#comment-7846364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've never heard of HackStars (came via hackernews), but sounds interesting. And great way to approach the situation - if you're passionate about the subject and willing to put in the effort, it will almost certainly turn out in your favor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So well done, and a nice summary. Maybe you could let us know a bit more about the emotional process turning the situation around, and how long it took to come up with a new approach?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startups don&amp;#039;t need business plans</title><link>http://www.bradwrage.com/post/85248207#comment-7188551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd agree about a formal business plan, but it's not bad to have either. For a small team, it has the effect of "rubber-ducking" - that is, explaining your ideas will force you to organize them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An entire business plan written out may not be of much use, but the process of *trying* to write it is definitely going to pay off. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caffeinated Simpleton — Fine. Git is Awesome.</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/development/2009/01/31/fine-git-is-awesome.html#comment-5725686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't had a chance to use Mercurial quite yet, though your Mac analogy tempts me. I've been using git and github for some time now, and it's been a slick experience overall/ Like you said, quick local branching is probably one of the best features.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I'll give mercurial a try for my next side-project - always a good idea to at least try out new systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The bittersweet rewrite</title><link>http://dev.cothink.org/blog/2009/01/06/the-bittersweet-rewrite/#comment-5046608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank Thomas and David.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David, your article in particular was great.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've signed up for a year, we'll see how things go!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>