<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sevesteen</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sevesteen/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sevesteen/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:37:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Smallest Minority: Quora - a Target-Rich Environment</title><link>https://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2019/08/quora-target-rich-environment.html#comment-4581353778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I personally know someone who had a no-shots-fired defensive gun use against a robber.  I talked to the defender, and saw the article on our newspaper's website. I know the defender's name, the exact location, the date...but I can no longer find any record on the internet that this happened.  No conspiracy, just small town news that nobody cares about enough to archive--I think the local newspaper was the only reporting on the story.  There's a good chance that in a town much bigger it wouldn't have been considered newsworthy at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Do US Parents Fear Most?</title><link>https://www.asecurelife.com/what-do-us-parents-fear-most/#comment-3665927814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If we're talking about reasonableness of fears, is it really reasonable to use the murder statistics for 18-24 year old adults as justification for feeling unsafe about our 10 year old children?   I'm pretty sure there's a big difference between the statistics of the two groups.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Politicians Sharing Passwords</title><link>https://www.troyhunt.com/the-trouble-with-politicians-sharing-passwords/#comment-3646996374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In some places the process to get all the right access to do your job is so unnecessarily difficult even for those of us in IT that password sharing is rampant.  In a case like this it isn't fair to blame the users, something needs to be done to make it practical to do the right thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Solving the Gun Problem With an App | Scott Adams Blog</title><link>http://blog.dilbert.com/post/137747115841#comment-2471047319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In general if it is legal, doesn't risk my employment and I'm not going to drink I carry.  I'm not going to consult an app first, and I'm certainly not going to register with an app.  Mass shootings aren't common enough for it to affect my decision one way or another...and if I think a gun is going to be needed to go there, I go somewhere else instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;There ought to be a law&amp;#8221;  -Mother of 2015 Darwin Award Nominee</title><link>http://www.thedailyliberator.com/law-mother-2015-darwin-award-nominee/#comment-2122440528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really wish you'd get rid of the obnoxious pop-ups.  90% of the time I intentionally close the entire tab without trying to read further.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Smallest Minority: Computer Bleg</title><link>http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2015/03/computer-bleg.html#comment-1908270353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How much memory can your current computer take?  As a low-budget option for non-gaming use, I might consider upping the RAM to 8gig or so, adding a SSD and buying a copy of Win7 on your current box.  For most everyday tasks an SSD and sufficient RAM will feel faster than upping processor speed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police: Teen shot dead by shopper wanted new Nike Air Jordan shoes</title><link>http://www.sltrib.com/news/1985297-155/police-teen-shot-dead-by-shopper#comment-1757589457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I go to that mall a couple times a year, so I've paid closer attention than I usually would.  Initial reports didn't mention that the teen also had a gun, making it seem that the shooting was to retrieve a pair of stolen shoes.  That bothered me, and that would have been morally wrong as well as illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I legally carry a gun most of the time, but I also don't own anything I'm willing to kill to keep.  If I could give up a $200 pair of shoes and not have to shoot someone I would--assuming I've got time enough to figure out the odds, and that I'm convinced letting him have my shoes would end the situation safely for me.  Statistically most of the time when someone legally pulls a gun on a criminal nobody gets shot--the criminal runs or surrenders.  Most people won't shoot if it can be avoided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Violent crime should be dangerous, and there aren't many situations where I will fault someone who decides to shoot a criminal who is currently using a gun to commit a violent crime. Benefit of the doubt goes to the law abiding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 08:52:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police Should Be On, Not Behind, Cameras</title><link>http://www.punkrocklibertarians.com/police-not-behind-cameras/#comment-1724876480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think dashcams are more good than bad, body cameras would be even more.  Good cops will welcome them, cops that don't welcome them aren't good cops.   However, they need to be mandatory if used, and "oops, the camera broke" means that the cop's testimony is very suspect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:42:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Earbuds Under $50</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-headphones-under-40/#comment-1555096032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bought a pair of the Panasonic earbuds based on this review, and I was extremely disappointed.   I like the sound of the Monoprice earbuds, but they aren't very comfortable for long wearing.  With the tips that seal my ears the Panasonic are extremely bass heavy with little mids or treble--almost like listening to music with earplugs.   They are OK with smaller tips, but not great, and not noise blocking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Sidney schools might be the safest in the country</title><link>http://wdtn.com/2014/08/14/why-sidney-schools-might-be-the-safest-in-the-country/#comment-1545633302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Publicising this is probably a bigger safety benefit than the actual guns in the school are--virtually all spree shooters choose places where guns are not allowed.    A cheaper solution, and probably just as effective would be to publicly adopt a policy that staff with carry licenses could carry at school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A "wannabe cop" who is legally allowed to work in a school would be legally allowed to own a gun, and probably would--so the only time guns legally in the school would make a difference here would be if the wannabe recovered so quickly they didn't have time to go get a gun.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1413091801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I thought it would help make the world a better place, I'd voluntarily give up my guns.  Statistics matter though--if we're going to do something, and especially something concerning the bill of rights we need to be aware of unintended consequences.  Prohibition of alcohol was a failure, and launched organized crime.  Prohibition of pot is a failure.  Statistics say that overall the laws we've tried have been a failure.  I've no confidence that doing the same thing but more will be more successful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 23:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1411430325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least you are honest about attempting to amend the constitution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In most of America you can walk down the street without getting shot at, and again, the people shooting are going to shoot regardless of whether you take MY guns away.  In the US at least, violent crime is not correlated with gun laws, based on Brady Campaign scores for state gun laws vs FBI crime statistics.  This is fairly easy to do yourself--Either Excel or lots of online tools to do correlation analysis. Put the Brady scores in one column, the matching FBI violent crime rate in the other, and go.  Results are well below statistical significance, and the direction depends on how you treat DC.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 20:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1411102753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I'm reading that right, as long as the excuse is good enough, it is OK to violate the constitution?  How about we restrict press and  publishing to prevent copycat spree shooters--is that different?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 17:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409758209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because prohibition was so effective for alcohol, and works so well for drugs and immigration.  Would you be amending the constitution, or merely ignoring  the parts you don't like?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 06:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409441381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google "NICS Prosecutions" if you think I'm making this up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 23:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409440345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Won't do the whole thing again...but "toddler shot", date before May 20 first relevant story from Google showed me was this one: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/21/justice/north-carolina-toddler-shot/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/21/justice/north-carolina-toddler-shot/"&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Felon in possession, 19 years old with a pistol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google search on toddler shoots, date before May 20, first result:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/year-old-shot-north-carolina-article-1.1531434" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/year-old-shot-north-carolina-article-1.1531434"&gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;"misdemeanor child abuse because the house was kept in a dirty state." (in addition to felony child abuse for the shooting)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't cherry pick, the only "massaging" was excluding stories after May 20 to get stories where there was a little time for followup--but neither of these articles even required followup, both showed some issue in the initial report.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 23:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409367406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's half an hour I'm not willing to spend again for an internet argument.  If you are actually interested you can do what I did--Google something like "toddler shoots",  pick the first handful of stories that are about this.   Google names and addresses within each story.  When you find something like "police recovered illegal", "previous multiple police visits", "domestic violence" "probation" "arrested for something unrelated" or similar put that story in "not normal".  (I'll leave it up to you whether "trailer park" counts...but it shows up more than I would expect)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're honest and reasonably skilled with Google, shouldn't take more than about 15-20 minutes to get first 3 of 5 with evidence of not normal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 21:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409330757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, most often they were NOT allowed to own guns under current laws.  Background checks are a failure, there are virtually no prosecutions.  Out of the original 73,000 denials in 2010,  62 cases were referred for prosecution, most were declined by prosecutors or dismissed by the court--just 13 found guilty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 21:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3-year-old Arizona boy shoots 18-month-old brother dead with neighbor&amp;#8217;s gun</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/27/3-year-old-arizona-boy-shoots-18-month-old-brother-dead-with-neighbors-gun/#comment-1409019915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've done some unscientific, Google-based research on "preschool shooter" cases, checking on followup stories a week or two later.  In almost all of them I was able to find evidence that it wasn't a normal law abiding household. The home is generally well known to the police for drugs, crime or violence, or further investigation shows an adult pulled the trigger and blamed it on the preschooler.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 16:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Honda Settles U.S. Suit Over Nonroad-Engine Emisions</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-18/honda-settles-u-s-suit-over-nonroad-engine-emisions.html#comment-938156955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honda didn't win....Honda was shaken down by a thug.  Didn't cost them too much, but still a shakedown. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intelligun &amp;#8211; Fingerprint security</title><link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/01/30/intelligun-fingerprint-security/#comment-784143339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The gun grabbers already want to make this or the equivalent mandatory on all guns, whether or not it works and regardless of cost.  I believe New Jersey has a law already on the books making it mandatory once the technology is released commercially. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Reynolds:  &amp;#8220;Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/21/ham-sandwich-nation-due-process-when-everything-is-a-crime/#comment-773950689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there should be a limit to the seriousness of the original charge vs any plea bargain or lesser conviction--If you charge someone with a charge worth 10 years, a plea can only drop that to 40%.  If a jury finds the defendant guilty of less, then the conviction doesn't stand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ted Dziuba - I Am a Gun Owner. Let’s Talk Gun Control.</title><link>http://teddziuba.com/post/37961127287#comment-741389636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Disqus as it is working here is the worst commenting system I've ever used.  I'm currently replying to Jessica Darko, who replied to my comment that was meant to be a reply to whoever was saying Mother Jones Magazine disproved the 'more likely in a gun free zone'--when the magazine didn't mention gun free zones at all. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder where this reply winds up...  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Civilians Armed With Guns Ever Capture, Kill, or Otherwise Stop Mass Shooters?</title><link>http://www.volokh.com/2012/12/14/do-civilians-armed-with-guns-ever-capture-kill-or-otherwise-stop-mass-shooters/#comment-738104724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People who really intend suicide are more likely to try effective methods.  People who don't really mean it are likely to pick ineffective methods.  I'm also not willing to give up my rights to protect someone else from a voluntary act that they initiated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:11:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ted Dziuba - I Am a Gun Owner. Let’s Talk Gun Control.</title><link>http://teddziuba.com/post/37961127287#comment-738050457</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I'm not seeing anything in that article about gun free zones one way or the other.  It is also a difficult thing to determine whether a place realistically bans guns--A few malls have 'no weapons' buried in among 47 other mall rules that nobody reads.  In my state, that doesn't count unless it can be proved that I read the rules. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sevesteen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:08:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>