<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of seoscout</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/seoscout/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/seoscout/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:12:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dayparting Twitter</title><link>(u'https://www.ducttapemarketing.com/blog/dayparting-twitter/',%2010362451L)#comment-10362451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You lose people who cultivate their followers in smaller numbers if you do that. These are people who pay more attention to your tweets in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Note that TwitterCounter points out we're overtaking GuyKawasaki in a few weeks, thought I'll believe it when I see it!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- @Twitter_Tips&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Click-Through Rate Can You Expect From Twitter?</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/07/07/twitter-clickthrough-rate/',%2012257326L)#comment-12257326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ours is about as low as would be predicted. But rate should be calculated against reach, not followers, because retweets are where the vast majority of clicks originate from.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For an idea of retweets (not clicks) by reach see "The 100 Most Influential People in Twitter:" &lt;a href="http://www.twitalyzer.com/twitalyzer/list.asp?l=100&amp;amp;uri=list.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.twitalyzer.com/twitalyzer/list.asp?l=100&amp;amp;uri=list.asp"&gt;http://www.twitalyzer.com/t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Click-Through Rate Can You Expect From Twitter?</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/07/07/twitter-clickthrough-rate/',%2012257838L)#comment-12257838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you autofollow, the more followers you have the more spammers you get, generally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The importance of #hashtags in your tweets</title><link>(u'http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/05/the-importance-of-hashtags-in-your-tweets/',%2012266635L)#comment-12266635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this needed information!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward: $100 and more for identifying who is handing over Twitter access to spammers</title><link>(u'http://www.inquisitr.com/30178/reward-100-and-more-for-identifying-who-is-handing-over-twitter-access-to-spammers/',%2013213355L)#comment-13213355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those that have access to your account are listed here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/account/connections" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/account/connections"&gt;http://twitter.com/account/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can revoke access to any you wish. However, Twitter has a known issue that causes inaccuracies in followers (they're working on it). That is the most likely problem. When a 3d party service has access to your account and abuses it, they usually tweet on your behalf, not follow people on your behalf. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reward: $100 and more for identifying who is handing over Twitter access to spammers</title><link>(u'http://www.inquisitr.com/30178/reward-100-and-more-for-identifying-who-is-handing-over-twitter-access-to-spammers/',%2013215236L)#comment-13215236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the main issue:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://help.twitter.com/forums/31935/entries/42070" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://help.twitter.com/forums/31935/entries/42070"&gt;http://help.twitter.com/for...&lt;/a&gt; (Visit the "New Known Issues pages for several issues posted here" links from this page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is the latest comment from Twitter on it:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://help.twitter.com/forums/31935/entries/44433" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://help.twitter.com/forums/31935/entries/44433"&gt;http://help.twitter.com/for...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:27:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Small Discovery Makes Lazyfeed Exceedingly Cool</title><link>(u'http://www.damondnollan.com/2009/07/small-discovery-makes-lazyfeed.html',%2013317822L)#comment-13317822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where would you suggest getting an invitation code? I don't see one on LouisGray&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Small Discovery Makes Lazyfeed Exceedingly Cool</title><link>(u'http://www.damondnollan.com/2009/07/small-discovery-makes-lazyfeed.html',%2013328260L)#comment-13328260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you know how to sign up to receive an invite code? Their latest tweet indicates you have to sign up to get one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:33:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Small Discovery Makes Lazyfeed Exceedingly Cool</title><link>(u'http://www.damondnollan.com/2009/07/small-discovery-makes-lazyfeed.html',%2013328630L)#comment-13328630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Damond!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:51:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook @Mentions: Five Ways They Could Impact Twitter</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/09/10/facebook-mentions-10/',%2016362196L)#comment-16362196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't reference people with the same syntax. FaceBook removes the "@" before posting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can a Professional Twitterer Save Rep. Joe Wilson&amp;#8217;s Rep?</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/09/11/joe-wilson-pro-tweeter/',%2016508767L)#comment-16508767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So other people are putting words in his mouth. Happens all the time for politicians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In face, the body language in the photo of him shouting at Obama made it look pre-planned: One hand resting on lap, still sitting comfortably. Which is okay in and of itself: most politicians plan as close to 100% of what they say as they can. It also looked like the politicians sitting next to him were also in on the pre-planning: no change in position from previous photo, still sitting comfortably looking forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So who's idea was it for Joe to shout? His biggest contributors are from the health insurance industry, so that's one guess. I just wonder if whoever had the idea are the same people behind whatever he will be tweeting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:31:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How We Can Help Reduce Twitter Spam: Broadcast the Spammer!</title><link>(u'http://windmillnetworking.com/2009/09/21/how-we-can-help-reduce-twitter-spam-broadcast-the-spammer/',%2017140645L)#comment-17140645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most essential IS to report them as spam. Blocking reported spammers works to get them removed from Twitter. Blocking unreported spammers just removes them from your timeline and leaves them to go after other people. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guide to Advanced Twitter Search</title><link>(u'http://thesocialmediaguide.com.au/2009/10/24/advanced-twitter-search-guide/',%2020982916L)#comment-20982916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have two unintentional typos where : ) and  : ( were converted to pics under attitude search&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter&amp;#8217;s lists make Chris Brogan feel bad</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/31/twitters-lists-make-chris-brogan-feel-bad/',%2021496428L)#comment-21496428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's worth considering other's feelings. That's part of being in a community. The solution? Each person should take the same approach they took to #FollowFriday. This isn't a new issue :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recovering from Twitter Phishing</title><link>(u'http://chelpixie.com/blog/2009/11/02/recovering-from-twitter-phishing/',%2021711302L)#comment-21711302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://status.twitter.com/post/212318608/researching-username-password-change-problems" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://status.twitter.com/post/212318608/researching-username-password-change-problems"&gt;http://status.twitter.com/p...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can be "locked out after trying to reset your password"&lt;br&gt;Twitter "encourages you not to make changes to your email address, password, or user name during this time."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Cheat Sheet</title><link>(u'http://thesocialmediaguide.com.au/2009/11/03/twitter-cheat-sheet/',%2021823795L)#comment-21823795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great work! But all the links I have tried don't work so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Twitter&amp;#8217;s Trending Topics Signify What&amp;#8217;s Important to You?</title><link>(u'http://www.briansolis.com/2009/11/trending-topics-reveal-twitters-immaturity-but-theres-hope/',%2022261296L)#comment-22261296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they're immature too, but Twitter should be very careful in putting roadblocks in front of popular uses of Twitter. It's not possible to predict the future, so limiting what people want to do is not necessarily a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I think Twitter is going to focus more on blocking spammers from piggybacking on trending topics than changing the topics themselves. "Improvement to trends...more relevant tweets" sounds like fitting the tweets better to the trends, not fitting the trends to something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:01:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dropbox Selective Sync Still Not A Patch On SugarSync Linking</title><link>('https://disqus.com/home/discussion/web2andmore/dropbox_selective_sync_still_not_a_patch_on_sugarsync_linking/',%2065151469L)#comment-65151469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can sync any folder outside dropbox using a simple GUI or just Right Click any folder and Select "Sync With Dropbox"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's how: &lt;a href="http://wiki.dropbox.com/DropboxAddons/DropboxFolderSync" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wiki.dropbox.com/DropboxAddons/DropboxFolderSync"&gt;http://wiki.dropbox.com/Dro...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thesis Tutorial: Multiple Custom Page Templates</title><link>(u'http://berchman.com/thesis-tutorial-multiple-custom-page-templates/',%2069869576L)#comment-69869576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts on whether this would apply to Genesis (StudioPress) generally?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://daily.kylebunch.com/post/992638960</title><link>(u'http://thedailybunch.com/post/992638960',%2070698910L)#comment-70698910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://theantisocialmedia.com/post/1155659668</title><link>(u'http://theantisocialmedia.com/post/1155659668',%2079489736L)#comment-79489736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree in principle, but...it depends. Sometimes less engaged people need more help, and I'm on Twitter to help. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why We Sold TechCrunch To AOL, And Where We Go From Here</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/28/why-we-sold-techcrunch-to-aol-and-where-we-go-from-here/',%2081790539L)#comment-81790539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats on connecting with such a great team to help drive the future of TechCrunch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Add a Social Sharing Toolbar to Build Traffic and Engagement</title><link>(u'http://pamorama.net/2010/11/10/add-a-social-sharing-toolbar-to-build-traffic-and-engagement/',%2096093170L)#comment-96093170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What method are you using to place the social media icons for your accounts at the right edge of the screen?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:05:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whoa, Google, That’s A Pretty Big Security Hole</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/20/whoa-google-thats-a-pretty-big-security-hole/',%20100182455L)#comment-100182455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Google "encouraged" responsible disclosure it would respond to emails.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do I Get More Followers On Twitter?</title><link>(u'http://twittercism.com/get-more-followers/',%20128294562L)#comment-128294562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, they suspend tons of accounts all the time that churn. That doesn't mean many accounts that churn don't get away with it, but it's not accurate to say they "rarely do anything about it."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>