<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for segmentis</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/segmentis/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/segmentis/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:24:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Koch Brothers Tentacles Reach Out to Squelch Albuquerque BRT</title><link>https://usa.streetsblog.org/2015/10/16/koch-brothers-tentacles-reach-out-to-squelch-albuquerque-brt/#comment-2494772925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Problem is, Mr. Gessing is ALSO a paid hack. He doesn't live in Albuquerque, and he doesn't represent its interests. He represents the interests of the fossil fuel industry and the greedy brothers Koch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fort Hood Shooter Ivan Lopez: A Familiar Profile</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/249041#comment-1318392844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Other countries manage to have far lower levels of violent crime than gun-happy America, so it would seem it IS possible to make some progress in a more peaceful direction, no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:42:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fort Hood Shooter Ivan Lopez: A Familiar Profile</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/249041#comment-1318389025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And I'm OK with that. It's far harder to kill multiple people in short order w/ a chainsaw than with a semiautomatic. I'm quite sure statistics will bear me out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Plutocracy Ruled by Self-Centered Jerks?</title><link>http://billmoyers.com/2013/08/27/a-plutocracy-ruled-by-self-centered-jerks/#comment-1022467702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the center cannot hold. Greedy short-sightedness on the part of the few eventually (1) eliminates the market as fewer and fewer people can afford to pay for goods and services and (2) leads to revolution, beheadings, that sort of thing. Fools and their money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Plutocracy Ruled by Self-Centered Jerks?</title><link>http://billmoyers.com/2013/08/27/a-plutocracy-ruled-by-self-centered-jerks/#comment-1022462371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The people are getting their "information" from media owned by the ultra-rich and from politicians who twist the truth and don't get called on it. So in reality, the people do NOT, in fact, know who and what sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:28:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Plutocracy Ruled by Self-Centered Jerks?</title><link>http://billmoyers.com/2013/08/27/a-plutocracy-ruled-by-self-centered-jerks/#comment-1022457964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...Think about the difference between 1% of a billionaire's income and 1% of the income of someone below the poverty line--increasingly more Americans. Then consider that taxes are used for services and infrastructure that benefit us all, and make everyone's success possible in the first place. As for the Fairness Doctrine, contrary to Limbaugh's lies, it only required that both sides be given equal time on the airwaves taxpayers of all political beliefs subsidize. How on earth would that not be fair?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: | News - KOAT Home</title><link>http://www.koat.htv.preview.ib-prod.com/htv/servlet/page/view/htv-alb/news/-/9154100/21568458/-/145frng/-/index.html#comment-1014557224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is a tax-exempt religious institution "supporting" anyone in an election? Those are my tax dollars subsidizing them, so they have no business whatsoever picking sides. I hope KOAT follows up on this and that others concerned about Legacy Church's politicking from the pulpit will express their objections to the IRS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More than 1,000 pastors plan to challenge IRS by endorsing presidential candidate</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/23/more-than-1000-pastors-plan-to-challenge-irs-by-endorsing-presidential-candidate/#comment-660214711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two wrongs ≠ right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:31:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More than 1,000 pastors plan to challenge IRS by endorsing presidential candidate</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/23/more-than-1000-pastors-plan-to-challenge-irs-by-endorsing-presidential-candidate/#comment-660212095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't mean they should do it alone. Please, all--contribute to AU and consider filling out your very own copy of IRS Form 3949-A to report tax fraud!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649929347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, it most certainly does not stand to reason. There's no logic to that statement at all. When has anyone on this thread ever heard a religious extremist of any stripe speak ill of a prophet or god of his or her faith? Sure, extremists may act in opposition to such gods or prophets' teachings, but ALWAYS in their names.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649925460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because Terry Jones is the only anti-Islamist in America, you mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:26:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649924508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about we stop saying it's "the thing" until we do?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649920924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So you believe al Qaeda's leaders would speak against Muhammed? Or Allah? I don't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649920000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What extremist Christian mocks, or worse, blasphemes against Christ? I think you're the one who misunderstands.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649918661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There appear to be a number of players who could easily have ponied up enough money for what, I'm hearing, is a very shoddily produced film. Also, whipping up anti-Muslim sentiment on 9/11 is what you're referring to in paragraph two, correct?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649916554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought a dubbed version just appeared on YouTube and made the rounds. I'm all for simple explanations, and completely agree that this discussion, in particular, is subpar from an evidence-based perspective alone, but ANY explanation requires facts, so doesn't it make sense we wait until a few more are in?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649914613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you! There's not a shred of evidence--and certainly no smoking receipt--to back up the apparently criminally insane Bacile's claim.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649909516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The First Amendment provides for freedom of speech. However, Supreme Court decisions interpreting it, which are the law of the land, absolutely limit the right. For example (and very relevant here), yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theater is NOT protected speech.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mystery Man Behind The Anti-Muslim Film Blamed For Attacks</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/tpmmuckraker.com/2012/09/mt-preview-1dd8e29f19228b2c6739dd7c97ade43b47c56681.php#comment-649905577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's no actual evidence that $5 mil was raised, and if it was, my understanding is that the "production value" doesn't demonstrate it. Basile or whatever-other-alias is a criminal and, quite obviously, a sociopath.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642980029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Questionable taste in women is a factor you consider in a candidate? Eek.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 02:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642977785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who said that? I call straw-man shenanigans! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 02:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642974529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more, but you forgot about the other powerful motivation for the illegal war in Iraq: OIL. So it all goes back to greed, which just happens to be a deadly sin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642972232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking of selective memory, it's so interesting how Rethuglicans remember there's more than one branch of government when there's credit to be taken, but conveniently forget when there's blame to be spread. Pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642968157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These states are united, so you don't get to pick and choose. How about just acknowledging that we're ALL Americans and embracing our differences, which make us great. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Revealing Photos of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/194036#comment-642967385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And still not even a little bit funny. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">segmentis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>