<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for scottoraw</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/scottoraw/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/scottoraw/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:27:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TUAW wins the "phrase of the day" award</title><link>http://technovia.co.uk/2008/06/tuaw-wins-the-p.html#comment-644451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Ian.  Due to an involuntary burst of laughter, I've just spat a large mouthful of noodles over my laptop !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scottoraw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:27:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble &amp;ndash; a one channel radio station of white noise</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/05/scoble-a-one-channel-radio-station-of-white-noise/#comment-597905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;woah, I must have missed that one, Paul (thankfully).  It's appalling that nonsense of this nature gates disseminated by someone who claims to act as a filter - where's the filtering here?  And while we're at it, there should be a retraction from Robert that either a) he was taken in by this or b) he was in on the act - which if it is the latter, is, to my mind, utterly reprehensible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scottoraw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble &amp;ndash; a one channel radio station of white noise</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/06/05/scoble-a-one-channel-radio-station-of-white-noise/#comment-597287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Steve,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A fine, well judged analysis.  Robert said something to me via Twitter recently regarding Twitter's recent problems.  I suggested that that, collectively, we should consider taking it easy on Twitter as it is, after all is said and done, a free service.  Robert replied that it it wasn't, in fact, a free service as he paid for it in his attention.  As Robert put it; "My time isn't free.  Is yours?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It struck me as a curious way of looking at things, but not an approach that I would necessarily dismiss out of hand.  However, if this is a model of "commerce" that he finds validity in then I think it's something Robert should do well to remember i.e. we are all paying for Robert by OUR attention and we expect a decent ROI with less supercilious 'downtime'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scottoraw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>