<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sandorzans</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sandorzans/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sandorzans/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:46:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Strategizing Radical Transparency</title><link>http://www.philippmueller.de/strategizing-radical-transparency/#comment-13006214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the radical transparency notion suggests a radical cultural change in a any given organization. This cultural 'revolution' would be especially prominent in the government context, where secrecy is the norm. i guess that the main constrain is when the 'when not to apply it' list becomes a list of plausible excuses for limiting the extension of transparency to areas where it could indeed be applaied. secrecy is often elevated to a general value than a  rational constrains: this has always been the case in the public sector. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandorzans</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>