<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ryansobol</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ryansobol/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ryansobol/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:41:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Let's Learn GraphQL | Learn GraphQL</title><link>http://localhost:6009/reviews#comment-2307268670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kudos on building a fantastic tutorial. Any plans to open source the tutorial tech?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:41:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Datamappify - A New Take on Decoupling Domain, Form and Persistence in Rails | Fred Wu's Blog | Freelance Ruby on Rails, PHP, Front-end, UI Web Developer in Melbourne, Australia</title><link>https://fredwu.me/blog/2013-06-27-datamappify-a-new-take-on-decoupling-domain/#comment-1361755310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Datamappify seems well architected.  Kudos!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quick question -- how does it handle uniqueness constraints / validations on table columns?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ORM anti-pattern series - Mehdi Khalili</title><link>http://www.mehdi-khalili.com/orm-anti-patterns-series/#comment-1361714021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Value types in JavaScript - Baby Steps</title><link>http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/04/01/value-types-in-javascript/#comment-1316405287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. So many words and so much code written about the equality of two objects. In Ruby, this is a solved problem. See &lt;a href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/7157051/1429373" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stackoverflow.com/a/7157051/1429373"&gt;http://stackoverflow.com/a/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;W.R.T immutable objects, I'd personally love to see JS (and Ruby) adopt language-level features to support them. For example, stashing immutable objects in a weak hash map could ensure the existence of only 1 new Point({x: 1, y: 1}) object.  Furthermore, that object could be garbage collected without destroying it's uniqueness property.  Will something like this happen? Given the direction ES6 and 7, I doubt it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 03:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumors of Ruby&amp;#8217;s Demise</title><link>http://devblog.avdi.org/2014/02/23/rumors-of-rubys-demise/#comment-1258079329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I think there’s a kind of peer-pressure when you’re deeply embedded in the developer community to switch to the new hotness or fall woefully behind. For instance, I feel like I really ought to be studying Backbone, Angular or Ember right now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;+1. Our backend team needed a companion client framework for Rails, tried out Angular, but then fell in love with React. Confident developers use the right tool for the right job with the right people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://javascriptjabber.com/073-jsj-react-with-pete-hunt-and-jordan-walke/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://javascriptjabber.com/073-jsj-react-with-pete-hunt-and-jordan-walke/"&gt;http://javascriptjabber.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:58:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.knockmeout.net/2011/04/event-delegation-in-knockoutjs.html</title><link>http://www.knockmeout.net/2011/04/event-delegation-in-knockoutjs.html#comment-690230032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1 for updating this post with the newer KO 2.0+ API.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:10:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it live? |  Tenderlovemaking</title><link>http://tenderlovemaking.com/2012/07/30/is-it-live.html#comment-603467925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice work Aaron!  I hope you plan on showing this off at &lt;a href="http://cascadiaruby.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cascadiaruby.com/"&gt;http://cascadiaruby.com/&lt;/a&gt; this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Destructuring with Ruby</title><link>http://tony.pitluga.com/2011/08/08/destructuring-with-ruby.html#comment-283244140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonderful write-up on destruction.  Thanks for the refresher.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Translation of Matz Q&amp;A article after joining Heroku @ Bamboo Blog</title><link>http://new-bamboo.co.uk/blog/2011/7/12/translation-of-matz-q-a-article-after-joining-heroku#comment-250125578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much for the translation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:52:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroku | Matz joins Heroku</title><link>http://blog.heroku.com/archives/2011/7/12/matz_joins_heroku/#comment-249687297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a pleasant surprise!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s the Status, Kenneth? - Rubinius</title><link>http://rubini.us/2011/07/05/whats-the-status-kenneth/#comment-245201967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet!  Can we get some details on how the status board is managed?  I can imagine it being tied to RubySpec coverage...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW - Grandma's Boy anyone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rubinius Summit 062011 in Pictures - Rubinius</title><link>http://rubini.us/2011/07/01/rubinius-summit-in-pictures/#comment-241243427</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That would be my guess as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 13:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Greg Weber's Programming Blog - High Performance Ruby Part 3: non-blocking IO and web application scalability</title><link>http://blog.gregweber.info/posts/2011-06-16-high-performance-rb-part3#comment-228301455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well presented and clear.  Thanks for the overview.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael van Rooijen (meskyanichi) - More concurrency on a single Heroku dyno with the new Celadon Cedar stack</title><link>http://michaelvanrooijen.com/articles/2011/06/01-more-concurrency-on-a-single-heroku-dyno-with-the-new-celadon-cedar-stack/#comment-215632033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting stuff.  Thanks for sharing your discoveries.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Unusual City Maps. Locals vs Tourists</title><link>http://blog.dohop.com/2011/05/19/locals-vs-tourists/#comment-212272439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Neat!  Thank you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:51:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Unusual City Maps. Locals vs Tourists</title><link>http://blog.dohop.com/2011/05/19/locals-vs-tourists/#comment-211837818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Seattle love?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 22:13:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing SproutCore 2.0 Developer Preview</title><link>http://blog.sproutcore.com/announcing-sproutcore-2-0/#comment-211827216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wahoo!  I can't wait to sink my teeth into this framework!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 21:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Call to Action for Women Programmers</title><link>http://www.rhok.org/2011/04/a-call-to-action-for-women-programmers/#comment-195306435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way to go RHOK!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 19:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroku | HUG recap</title><link>http://blog.heroku.com/archives/2010/11/5/hug-recap/#comment-94057568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The suspense!  I'm really looking forward to learning about the 5 new Heroku features.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to run Background Processes using Resque/Redis in a Ruby on Rails App</title><link>http://tommy.chheng.com/index.php/2010/10/how-to-run-background-processes-using-resqueredis-in-a-ruby-on-rails-app/#comment-93592053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's assume we have a shared Redis platform (e.g. RedisToGo).  Meaning the Rails development, test, staging, and production all connect with the same redis-server.  Is Resque smart enough to know to only process jobs that originate from that environment?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Postmodern - Mining RubyGems from Ore</title><link>http://postmodern.github.com/2010/10/25/mining-rubygems-from-ore.html#comment-90543048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tools are great!  And new tools, like Ore, show us how our current tool adds too much process or requires too much work to maintain.  But perhaps my rant obfuscated the real developer **pain** that you, me, and the entire Ruby gem developer community feels -- &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The suck that is RubyGems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a perfect world, the RubyGems and Bundler teams would sit down with consorts from the Ore, Jeweler, Hoe, etc. camps and draft a vision for RubyGems 2.0.  You bring up great points about the gemspec process!  Will the people who can actually effect change hear it (or listen for that matter)?  How many tools, like Ore, are we going to see in a years time until they do?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Postmodern - Mining RubyGems from Ore</title><link>http://postmodern.github.com/2010/10/25/mining-rubygems-from-ore.html#comment-90311265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ore looks great!  It's built on tools I love to use myself (i.e. RSpec and YARD).  The generators look useful and the OreTasks are unobtrusive.  I'll definitely consider Ore when planning my next Ruby gem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're right about one thing.  The Ruby community has had **alot** of discussion lately around gem cutting best-practices.  I'm curious, what kind of effect do you think Ore will have on that conversation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder when we as the Ruby community will finally have that hard conversation we **really** needs to have -- why do we keep inventing new, optional tools (e.g. Ore, Jeweler, Hoe, Bundler to some degree, etc.) to work around the one we're all required to use (i.e. RubyGems)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Redgreen plugin not working with Ruby 1.9.1</title><link>http://kresimirbojcic.com/2009/09/redgreen-plugin-not-working-with-ruby-1-9-1/#comment-54631634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog II - The Sequel Blog - How I Test Sequel</title><link>http://sequel.heroku.com/2010/05/19/how-i-test-sequel/#comment-53645087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just because it's simple, doesn't mean it's easy.  Kudos on keeping your standards high.  I will definitely consider Sequel for my upcoming projects.  And thanx for sharing insights into your commit-release process.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Travel To The Core Rails 3 Methods Without Leaving IRB Prompt</title><link>http://dolzhenko.org/blog/?p=167#comment-52776714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love it -- Russian ingenuity at it's finest!  I haven't looked at the code, but tell me, does this library depend on Ruby 1.9.2 exclusively?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Sobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 19:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>