<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ruzel</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ruzel/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ruzel/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:35:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: REEEAAAAD, ya&amp;#8217;ll!</title><link>http://banapana.com/made-you-look/read#comment-408818043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn, yo. It's called speedstick, it's not expensive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Difficulty of Discovery (Shrinking Asteroids Version)</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/02/the-difficulty-of-discovery-shrinking-asteroids-version/#comment-144782710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It should be mentioned that the Internet was built to help scientists collaborate (one of many reasons) and it is likely driving collaboration in younger scientists today.  But I don't know about this getting more hard argument--maybe some kinds of science.  I work in a (relatively) new branch cognitive science that studies models of Bayesian Inference.  From what I see at conferences, there is a lot of low hanging fruit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The PlayStation Phone is real, actually</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/the-playstation-phone-is-real-actually/#comment-90793373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why doesn't Sony build their own OS?  I just don't get why they won't stick their neck out on this one.  Their computers, their consoles, their mobiles--all could be powered by a nice Sony OS.  They have the manpower and the smarts.  They could be an Apple--own the hardware and software.  It's odd to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Skeptical</title><link>http://banapana.com/mind-control/get-skeptical#comment-46018734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon, spacematic, you know I can't tell you that without at least an 8th level clerical ninja to know that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Learning Social Media: What Twitter Clients Will Do Next</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/whats-the-next-level-for-twitter-clients/#comment-9169537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've about this in a similar vein with regard to the hype about cloud computing (&lt;a href="http://banapana.com/the-hive/a-hybrid-standard-for-software)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://banapana.com/the-hive/a-hybrid-standard-for-software)"&gt;http://banapana.com/the-hiv...&lt;/a&gt;.  A hybrid of cloud/desktop computing will win the day.  The simple fact is, wireless access will never be 100% dense and 100% available (or reliable).  It's ridiculous to think that users will be satisfied with the idea that they should just go without those services in the interim.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 20:09:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You will watch the whole thing, praying it is... - Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/104294615#comment-9072953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My girlfriend is a real Earthnut, so I let her recycle it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recycling never felt so good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>