<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rtwomey</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rtwomey/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rtwomey/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:34:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How we use Sidekiq and Redis for massively concurrent workers</title><link>https://www.pushlayer.com/blog/2013/03/11/how-we-use-sidekiq-and-redis-for-massively-concurrent-workers#comment-826268026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome, great resources. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How we use Sidekiq and Redis for massively concurrent workers</title><link>https://www.pushlayer.com/blog/2013/03/11/how-we-use-sidekiq-and-redis-for-massively-concurrent-workers#comment-826259822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're using MRI as it's plenty performant enough for our needs, but perhaps in the future we'd consider moving to something with native threads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on Google and Apple's Earnings</title><link>http://avc.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-google-and-apples-earnings/#comment-5494294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What would make you feel more comfortable with Apple?  At what point would such compelling fundamentals make it possible to overlook things like their management transparency track record, or are you out no matter what?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CBS Is Quietly Building An Internet Radio Powerhouse</title><link>http://avc.com/2008/12/cbs-is-quietly/#comment-4148098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It will definitely be interesting to watch.  I liken this to the Internet video industry: it wasn't until YouTube proved that online video could be a commercial enterprise did the media companies become interested in working with the trend (Hulu) instead of against it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd bet that the success of streaming radio via Yahoo and AOL (and Pandora and &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt;) has shown the media companies that it's possible to work with this audio trend rather than against it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Are Two Phones In this World: iPhone and Not iPhone</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/there-are-two-phones-in-this-world.html#comment-4133181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd still recommend it. Text messages are very easy to use, and I especially like seeing it in the iChat-like interface.  For web connectivity, you can't find a better device: Safari on the iPhone is excellent.  And you'll probably like the apps.  There's a lot out there and I'm sure you'll find one that's helpful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:24:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Example of Good PR</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/11/example-of-good.html#comment-4029561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Terrible pitch.  Aside from the complete nonsequitor of Wired, I have no idea what they're talking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calculate How Much Spam Costs You</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/9035/calculate-how-much-spam-costs-you/#comment-3984751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not too annoyed by the marketing pitch.  Really, I prefer things like this over advertisements: it proves to you why you should consider their service using your own data.  If we had fewer banner ads and more things like this, people could judge for themselves what products to purchase on a far more even level.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple releases iPhone 2.2 update, it&amp;#8217;s a big one</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/20/apple-releases-iphone-22-update-its-a-big-one/#comment-3984633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using the update over the weekend, and I'm certainly impressed.  The iPhone is getting progressively better, but I wonder about Apple's priorities.  For instance, street view is a nice feature (and they implemented it beautifully), but I think there are other, more pressing priorities they could have worked on instead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For one, the maps feature is *so close* to being great for in-car navigation.  All it would need is improved recognition of where you are on your route.  Throw in turn-by-turn directions and route-recalculation and you've got a full-blown GPS device right there.  I see no limitations with the hardware that would prevent this, only that it must not be a very high priority for Apple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So how does Apple decide priorities?  GPS devices have been fantastic holiday sellers.  If Apple implemented these features in the iPhone, couldn't they make the marketing case to consider the iPhone as a gift instead of a GPS device?  Seems like that might further help holiday sales.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to calculate cost-per-acquisition for startups relying on freemium, subscription, or virtual items biz models</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/11/17/how-to-calculate-cost-per-acquisition-for-startups-relying-on-freemium-subscription-or-virtual-items-biz-models/#comment-3867484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great overview.  I typically focus on two critical parts of this for my freemium service: breadth and conversion ratio.  I first ensure that we have a steady flow of new users coming to our service and registering for the free account, then I make sure I'm spending enough time getting our conversion ratio as high as possible.  It's death if either of these sides of the equation get out of balance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've found that getting people to sign up for a free account is often the easy part: convincing enough people to sign up for the paid version is where the real work lies.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Usability presentation for iPhone apps and store</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/11/10/usability-presentation-for-iphone-apps-and-store/#comment-3663338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting research.  I'm especially intrigued about the results of the App Store behaviors.  Most of what I saw confirmed my own suspicions, but it's reassuring to see people taking reviews "with a grain of salt".  A lot of developers (myself included) have felt that the reviews on an app can make or break it with new users, but if people really are skeptical, then there may be some hope.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does a Web Office hurt Google or MSFT?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/does-a-web-office-hurt-google-or-msft/#comment-3363667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly agree with you on that.  I think people that promote Google Docs as an Office killer aren't quite understanding what Google Docs is all about (and what it isn't).  It's excellent for collaboration, and I use it regularly with people at work.  However, it's definitely NOT an Office replacement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Microsoft realizes this, and I think that's why having an online presence to compete with Google Docs will hurt Google far more than cannibalize any Office sales.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does a Web Office hurt Google or MSFT?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/does-a-web-office-hurt-google-or-msft/#comment-3361716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another possibility could be that this further extends the Office dominance in business, and slows down the adoption of Google Docs.  Many businesses purchase Office for the desktop as a necessary cost of doing business: they're not interested in jumping through hoops to save a few bucks (Open Office has only a fraction of Office users).  Extending that idea, I don't think Google Docs could be a replacement for Office anyway, as these mainstream users just aren't interested in switching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Therefor, I think by giving users additional options for using their existing Office installation will only further solidify Office dominance and continue to give users just enough reason not to switch.  So I see it hurting Google far more than it could ever hurt MSFT.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Apple Can Support True Background Applications on the iPhone</title><link>http://www.dracoware.com/blog/2008/10/24/how-apple-can-support-true-background-applications-on-the-iphone/#comment-3281785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, but what if you just limited it to one app at a time?  Basically, you'd restrict the user to only have 1 foreground and 1 background app running at any time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I worry that if you use the slicing approach (which is perfectly fine in that case), you would find yourself getting into task manager territory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help, I&amp;#8217;m clueless about Web Service scalability</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/10/05/help-im-clueless-about-web-service-scalability/#comment-9710563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@paul: One easy thing you can do is high-availability failover where a separate server takes over the IP address (and other characteristics) of your failed server.  Check out &lt;a href="http://www.linux-ha.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.linux-ha.org"&gt;www.linux-ha.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey - ActiveMerchant is about as easy as it gets</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/39857409#comment-773898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You bet.  I'm still working through my implementation now, so there's still some work to be done.  Incidentally, I used your Peepcode book as an introduction to getting started, which was a very helpful guide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/35060155#comment-486240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha, thanks.  I'm using it too, and I'm impressed.  It's a nice eye-candy way of viewing feeds, though it's not really meant for hardcore RSS addicts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I'm doing, actually, is pulling together lots of feeds that aren't in my regular newsreader and using snackr to display them.  That way, whenever I glance over at it, I'm guaranteed to see something I haven't already read, and can pick out things I may not have seen otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey - A busy day...</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/35174986#comment-486217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.  Luckily, the rain has been holding off.  Hopefully it stays that way, otherwise it will be a miserable day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Gmail</title><link>http://sitebeta.draconis.com/blog/2007/12/10/switching-to-gmail/#comment-310739402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeff: No, labels don't modify a message in any way.  When you forward the email to your secondary account, it will need to search for key words in that email to apply the label.  So this may not be possible, if you're just manually applying labels to your messages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Gmail</title><link>http://sitebeta.draconis.com/blog/2007/12/10/switching-to-gmail/#comment-310739395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeff: First, yes: labels are treated as folders in IMAP (an email that appears in multiple folders means it has multiple labels).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, to create that mirror Gmail account, yes: you would need to (painstakingly) recreate each label and filter, which can be quite a bit of work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Third, you're right: you won't be able to assign labels using the auto-forward, but if you setup your filters correctly on your mirror Gmail account, you can reapply those labels when it receives a forwarded email.  So, on the mirror account, setup filters that check for keywords for each message to assign your labels to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fourth, you may not be able to just do the forward/filter tip I suggested, due to your setup (if you do a lot of manual labeling, for instance).  In that case, you're options are to either relabel each item in your mirror Gmail account, or "just live with it" as a collection of lots of emails forwarded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And finally, for the process of copying, again: I don't use Thunderbird and don't know much about copying messages using it.  But if it's like Apple Mail, then you can do the following: select one or multiple messages, start dragging them to the destination Gmail folder, then press down the Command key (a green plus icon will appear, to indicate you're COPYING, rather than MOVING, your messages), then drop those messages on that destination folder.  I imagine Thunderbird is similar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, like I said, try copying just one message to start and seeing what happens.  Also, I suggest you check out the ThunderBird community support sites (&lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/support/#forums)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mozilla.org/support/#forums)"&gt;http://www.mozilla.org/supp...&lt;/a&gt; for better information than I can provide.  Hope this helps!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Gmail</title><link>http://sitebeta.draconis.com/blog/2007/12/10/switching-to-gmail/#comment-310739390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeff: Okay, I think I understand better now.  I did something similar when I was experimenting with this IMAP setup, in that I had a secondary Gmail account where I would upload one message at a time from my local copy to see what would happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I suggest trying is to use your secondary account and copy over just one message.  Start with that and see how it works.  Consider sending yourself an email that you don't care about, and experiment with it.  Then, try dragging that email over to your secondary Gmail account, and see what happens.  Did the email copy over?  Did it get deleted from the first account?  If you can answer those questions, then you'll have a pretty good idea of what will happen when you actually copy over your real messages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One other thing: to keep your emails in sync with both Gmail accounts, I imagine you're going to setup an "auto-forwarder"?  You can do this using Gmail, where it will automatically forward every email that comes in to your secondary Gmail account.  Then you won't have to worry about copying messages over like this again: they'll already be there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Gmail</title><link>http://sitebeta.draconis.com/blog/2007/12/10/switching-to-gmail/#comment-310739386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeff: So, if I understand correctly, you want archive all of the email that's currently in ThunderBird into Gmail (i.e. messages stored in TB that were there before you setup your Gmail account)?  If this is correct, then the idea is this: add your Gmail account to Thunderbird as a second account, using the IMAP protocol (instructions from Google are at &lt;a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=75725)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=75725)"&gt;http://mail.google.com/supp...&lt;/a&gt;, then drag+copy the email messages from your existing TB folders into the corresponding Gmail folders.  To prevent losing any messages, be sure you COPY (not MOVE) your email messages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry I can't be more helpful, though, as I'm not using ThunderBird for email (just Apple Mail).  Post any other questions you have though, as others may be able to help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updating Rubygems in Leopard (Mac OS 10.5)</title><link>http://www.draconis.com/blog/2007/10/28/updating-rubygems-in-leopard-mac-os-105/#comment-310739160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@rikas: Sounds like you need to set RUBY_SOURCE_DIR to point to your 1.8.6 installation of ruby:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RUBY_SOURCE_DIR="/path/to/ruby_source" gem update&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hiding a mounted volume on MacOS</title><link>http://www.draconis.com/blog/2007/09/05/hiding-a-mounted-volume-on-macos/#comment-310739124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey, that's a great idea!  It never occurred to me that in the UNIX world, files/folders starting with dot count as "hidden", but in Windows, they're ignored.  Great tip!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hiding a mounted volume on MacOS</title><link>http://www.draconis.com/blog/2007/09/05/hiding-a-mounted-volume-on-macos/#comment-310739119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, after upgrading to Leopard, not sure if this still works or not.  I installed Leopard and my Untitled volume (the Windows partition) appeared on my desktop again.  Re-running the command above seems to give a permissions problem.  If anyone else has any suggestions, be sure to post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple iPhones reduced in price</title><link>http://www.draconis.com/blog/2007/09/06/apple-iphones-reduced-in-price/#comment-310739141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, that's a very good point.  He sure knows what he's doing, alright.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>