<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rsanheim</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rsanheim/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rsanheim/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:48:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Logging can be tricky</title><link>http://corner.squareup.com/2014/09/logging-can-be-tricky.html#comment-1602930141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  This is really, really difficult to read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:48:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog | Quick and Easy Logging with LogBuddy | Relevance</title><link>http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2009/09/23/quick-and-easy-logging-with-logbuddy#comment-69564770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sandeep&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Correct, it does not work in IRB.  The way log_buddy works it needs a source file to function.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Rob&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: visudo: sudoers file busy, try again later</title><link>http://yousefourabi.com/linux/visudo-sudoers-file-busy-try-again-later#comment-905856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Warning: the chmod command you list may be too permissive for some systems, and will completely lock you out of your sudoers file!  This happened to me on a centos 5 install, where sudoers should be 0440 - the chmod you listed made it 0540, which broke it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Under Your Monitor?</title><link>http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2008/04/25/what%e2%80%99s-under-your-monitor/#comment-9833899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you meant abstractions like &lt;a href="http://ar.rubyonrails.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ar.rubyonrails.com/"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://ryandaigle.com/articles/2006/08/01/whats-new-in-edge-rails-simply-restful-support-and-how-to-use-it" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ryandaigle.com/articles/2006/08/01/whats-new-in-edge-rails-simply-restful-support-and-how-to-use-it"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  If we had any hibernate or gorm books in the office, those would be relegated to monitor stands as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: uno o dos</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159807188#comment-14587204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one…had me for a few seconds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: gzip compression with nginx</title><link>http://tumblelog.jauderho.com/post/27655495#comment-239082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this - looks even more safe then the config I posted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: save bang your head, active record will drive you mad</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159807850#comment-14586468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rails did not “change the meaning” of the bang to mean something dangerous.  Bang methods have &lt;strong&gt;always&lt;/strong&gt; meant that in Ruby, see Kernel#exit! for instance.  Matz has even commented on the fact that the bang means ‘danger’, and not necessarily modifies its receiver (though thats often the case).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;	&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See also &lt;a href="http://dablog.rubypal.com/2007/8/15/bang-methods-or-danger-will-rubyist" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dablog.rubypal.com/2007/8/15/bang-methods-or-danger-will-rubyist"&gt;David A Black’s post&lt;/a&gt; on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Basic Readability</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159808750#comment-14585606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric: I was saying any ruby programmer should know about the &lt;strong&gt;concepts&lt;/strong&gt; used in to_proc.  Ideally folks on your team would be read blogs or the ActiveSupport docs to get an initial understanding, and then look at the source code a bit later to gain a deeper knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;	&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And things like open classes and what “send” does it definitely foundational Ruby.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sometimes Too Much Is Too Much</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159808952#comment-14585384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This may be the greatest thing ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why don&amp;#8217;t you use a memetracker?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/02/08/why-dont-you-use-a-memetracker/#comment-9629184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read memorandum, among others, but I think it would really be more valuable if I could tell it what my favorite topics are and what I don't care about.  Then filter the most popular discussions based on that, so I get even less noise to deal with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;re: digg - its fun for wasting time, but I don't go there for any sort serious discussion.  Slashdot at +4 is much better for quality comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The closed blogosphere&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/01/11/the-closed-blogosphere/#comment-9626591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I blog about java, ruby on rails, TDD, agile in general, ajax, and pretty much anything nerdy.  Also the occasional politics and current affairs.  And aqua teen hunger force (of course).&lt;br&gt;- Rob&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rsanheim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>