<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rossouwh</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rossouwh/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rossouwh/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:13:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Johnny Miller Believes Tiger Woods 'Barely' Has Edge for Player of the Year | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/miller-believes-tiger-barely-has-edge-for-poy/#comment-1030711520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, give it a rest. I'm getting embarrassed on your behalf. Look up the definition of "public", then "private", and then "stalker" or "to stalk".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You would think it should be obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Miller Tiger Woods' Ball Flight Too 'One-Dimensional' | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/miller-woods-ball-flight-too-one-dimensional/#comment-1030692766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure I agree with this. A draw is almost always a safer shot, unless you play the feared snap hook. When you really require accuracy, two things can happen to your cut (fade); 1. It stays left which is ouch and which happens a lot, even with Tiger and; 2. it slices, in which case it almost goes further right than it goes long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also disagree on the sentiment that it's a confidence thing. The true beauty of a high cut (fade) is that it &amp;lt;emphasis&amp;gt;lands softly&amp;lt;/emphasis&amp;gt;. He hits his scoring irons so ridiculously far that he will most likely try and play the high cut from most positions. If it hits the intended area, it will have birdie written all over it, virtually always. A draw simply does not give you that soft landing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having said that, it does hurt to watch when he plays Augusta for example. So maybe he relies on the shot a tad too much. Possibly. Perhaps. Who knows? We don't. He does. This is only my personal opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Tiger Woods, Daughter Sam Walk Together at TPC Boston | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/video-woods-daughter-walk-together-at-tpc-boston/#comment-1030012491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you want the camera on you when you're having a very bad day at the office? That's right, you don't. It also seems as if you imply that he brought his daughter to the tournament just to get the cameras on him. Your comment defies logic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 16:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Tiger Woods, Daughter Sam Walk Together at TPC Boston | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/video-woods-daughter-walk-together-at-tpc-boston/#comment-1028736839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't win them all. But you can be #1 on the OWGR. Oops. Was that in your face?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods, Adam Scott, Phil Mickelson Grouped at Deutsche Bank Championship | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/tiger-scott-lefty-grouped-at-deutsche-bank/#comment-1019054826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not everyone I think. Which you so delightfully covered with your blanket "idiot" statement. Don't think all of Tiger's fans are oblivious to his faults either. I'm also sure that no one is faultless. And that includes me. And you unfortunately. So if you want to talk about being objective, say, about golf, let's remove everyone's personal / private lives, on and off course behaviour and look at just golf. Then you'll see, through statistics and his general play, why he has so many fans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to be objective about, say, the private lives of golfers, then take away the golf and look at each individual's record - which may or may not be readily available in the media - and you'll see why many people, which includes you it seems, dislike the guy. That's the beauty of freedom of choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not liking the guy is your right. Calling all of his fans idiots is too, but it's in poor taste really. We have a right to appreciate what he's done for the game and for the talent he possesses. Whether I will introduce my daughter to him has nothing to do with the sport and the reason we like to watch him play.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Scott Moves to Career-Best 2nd in World Rankings | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/scott-moves-to-career-best-2nd-in-owgr/#comment-1017827689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is a real putter. I swear I could actually see the putter when he shot a 66 on Sunday. He used it on the greens mostly. He got to those greens hitting some amazing iron shots, made possible by good tee shots. Apparently, that's how you win golf tournaments. They say a golfer "putts for dough", but clearly that's rubbish as it requires precision to allow these players to hit approach shots from the correct angles to give them the best opportunity to use said putter. So I think everything starts at the tee shot. Which he's pretty good at too, incidentally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: The OWGR evolve or rotates within a given time period. So Adam's 10 career wins have little to do with his current #2 ranking. His pretty spectacular (current) season does, however. You'll find his stats in this article. I guess it's also important that the OWGR evolves, otherwise Jack would still be number 1 even though he doesn't play anymore. I think if you want to look at historical statistics, best would be to check out the Hall of Fame. You might have incorrectly confused the two terms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2013 The Barclays - Justin Rose Three-Putts 72nd Hole Loses By a Shot | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/rose-three-putts-18-to-lose-barclays-by-one/#comment-1017809106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not illegal. We have a sport here where I come from, of which the rules are changed frequently as well. That doesn't make the previous rules illegal when they are still accepted as the actual rule. Part of rule changes are to better the game. Many players adapt quite well when the new rules are enforced. Scott and co may or may not adapt as well or at all. But then again, they just might. At the end of the day, and golfing history, there's will still be printed as legal victories. Why is it so hard to understand?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:05:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2013 The Barclays - Justin Rose Three-Putts 72nd Hole Loses By a Shot | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/rose-three-putts-18-to-lose-barclays-by-one/#comment-1017804487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scott's one of the worst putters (that has won) I've seen. Maybe more credit should be given to his tee shots and iron play. The guy really has a solid swing...which may or may not provide him with the odd opportunity to win a tournament.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Mickelson Makes Early Charge With 65 | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/mickelson-makes-early-charge-with-65/#comment-1017794639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is all conjecture. So what qualifies you above anyone else to speculate?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Mickelson Makes Early Charge With 65 | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/mickelson-makes-early-charge-with-65/#comment-1017788170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best thing is...you don't have to. Gotta love freedom of choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Mickelson Makes Early Charge With 65 | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/mickelson-makes-early-charge-with-65/#comment-1017784244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Donald's won plenty. He was also consistently racking up top 10's. That's how he got to #1. Same way Tiger does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Mickelson Makes Early Charge With 65 | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/mickelson-makes-early-charge-with-65/#comment-1017781362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He shot the best round of the day with DeLaet. How is that choking? Sometimes putts don't drop. Shocking, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Scott Hangs On For One-Shot Victory at The Barclays | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/scott-hangs-on-for-one-shot-victory-at-barclays/#comment-1017776443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is not the smartest thing I've read today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2013 The Barclays - Adam Scott Wins With Less Than His Best Stuff | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/scott-wins-barclays-with-less-than-best-stuff/#comment-1017764528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, Tiger explicitly said that he would have preferred Adam's season (1 major over 5 wins).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:14:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Erik Compton In Contention Day 2 Farmers Insurance Open | Golf Channel</title><link>http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golftalkcentral/compton-catches-tigers-attention-day-2-farmers/#comment-779031435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really? One comments about how God blessed him and your immediate reaction is to try and smother him with your agnosticism?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You just couldn't let it go and ignore it? Why does it bother you so much?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: Great story. Win or not. Hope Erik does well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://kerryanne.tumblr.com/post/24973353992</title><link>http://kerryanne.tumblr.com/post/24973353992#comment-571888029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uhm...wow!! My first thought was that the guy looked a bit like Louis CK, so didn't expect much. But uhm...wow!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:42:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why BlackBerry is &amp;#8220;cool&amp;#8221; in South Africa</title><link>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/cellular/51153-why-blackberry-is-cool-in-south-africa.html#comment-544046419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your first sentence is true. The first part of your second is categorically false and the last part highlights your subjective view on the matter. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why BlackBerry is &amp;#8220;cool&amp;#8221; in South Africa</title><link>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/cellular/51153-why-blackberry-is-cool-in-south-africa.html#comment-541747511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to browse the web on my Blackberry all the time. And it wasn't such a big pain as some of the commenters here make it out to be. Not in the slightest. Add to that the usual apps I would use: TIME Magazine, New York Times, Forbes, Fast Company etc. and I can tell you that for R 59 per month, Blackberry's cost effectiveness went a really long way for me personally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I now run Samsung's Galaxy S2 on Android ICS and have had my fair share of experience with iPhone, and still, I am not surprised why Blackberry is so popular. It's an excellent product (for what you pay), with a service that leaves you with the exact knowledge of what your bill will look like at the end of the month.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The death of BlackBerry [Infographic]</title><link>https://memeburn.com/2012/04/the-death-of-blackberry-infographic/#comment-509929854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seem to have neglected to mention that in 2009, Research in Motion was named "Fastest growing company in the world." &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sad to see how they have deteriorated. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:53:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How free is Vodacom News4u (spam)?</title><link>http://www.webaddict.co.za/2009/10/30/vodacom-news4u-spam/#comment-21340700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vodacom is getting more annoying by the day. It's frustrating to know we are merely puppets to these companies. Changing service providers will surely not solve anything either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to mention the amount of spam calls I receive for new contracts, from different vendors, even competing networks. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:23:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: HTC Touch HD</title><link>http://www.mpieters.com/2009/07/review-htc-touch-hd.html#comment-12813126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do agree that Windows Mobile out the box is terrible...and most people buying a phone will use the phone as is. I simply cannot recommend an out the box Windows Mobile phone with 6.1 running. And yes, still no app store which makes it really hard at times to find applications, especially up to date as many versions are scattered all across the net.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another downfall is that it seems Windows Mobile 6.5 won't officially launch very soon either. And when it does, STILL no app store. It seems we'll have to wait for Windows Mobile 7 sometime next year to launch together with the app store...but I'm going to stick my neck out and say...watch out for something spectacular. Sadly, it will be too little too late I think.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With Android making inroads - you can bet some 'open source' movement porting the OS to many more devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the lot, HTC has done a great job with what they had to work with. And lets be honest, while a stylus is regarded as uncool...it does come in handy at times. I did a lovely spider sketch of an idea that popped in my head late last night which would definitely have been impossible without a stylus or on an iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My conclusion: It's a lovely looking phone with some good functionality..but as I mentioned, the Omnia HD should be a much easier sell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for including my "I heart Windows Mobile" part :-) I do feel for MS. There aren't many people with the sort of patience to sculpt their device to their liking and are stuck...and will be stuck for a while still...with phenomenal technology hampered by antiquated software in Windows Mobile 6.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US Texting Champ Sends 470 Text Messages per Day</title><link>http://www.henrerossouw.co.za/?p=130#comment-12044071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ahh nice info, thanks Wogan. Profound. Even if we had those sort of unlimited plans, I simply cannot see myself loving text messaging that much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Get Retweeted on Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/02/how-to-get-retweeted/#comment-12039352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite a nifty post. Retweeting it now :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is funny&amp;#8230;and a bit scary!</title><link>http://www.henrerossouw.co.za/?p=128#comment-12026952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea how this works...I'm just amazed that it's possible. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes I am :-)</title><link>http://www.henrerossouw.co.za/?p=127#comment-12026080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey I didn't design the t-shirt... :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henre Rossouw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>