http://disqus.com/by/roseyna/enThu, 19 Feb 2009 04:01:37 -0000http://jedyoong.com/?p=4183#comment-6398103<p>Hi Jed. I think you miss the whole point. Elizabeth Wong's case is clear cut invasion of privacy and yes she did not breach any law...she's single, she didn't commit adultery (I hate it when people want to say that her case is the same as Chua Soi Lek's...hello, that was a scandal because he was married). So what if PAS wants to give support? What do u mean about khalwat etc? FYI, khalwat is an offense if comitted by Muslims. Now it will be different if say the victim is some Zurina or Fatimah etc...if that's the case then any support from PAS might be confusing. Like if you're a Buddhist would you like to be judged by Christian's law/faith? So why are you doing it?</p><p>Same example like Nasha Aziz 'kena' last few years...where she was recorded naked doing her own stuff at the confines of her own home. She was a victim...nobody said otherwise. So apa bende pulak pasal morality etc? I think maybe if somebody took pictures of you doing your 'business' in the loo &amp; spread to the whole cyberworld, perhaps you'll understand the difference between morality and clear-cut privacy invasion. At that time would you like people to slam you because you've no morality? It was not as if Ms Elizabeth willingly pose naked ... she was sleeping OK. FYI, I didn't know anything about her before this but I just feel you are looking at it the wrong way just because you don't like Pakatan Rakyat</p>roseynaThu, 19 Feb 2009 04:01:37 -0000