<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ronpaulgraphs</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ronpaulgraphs/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ronpaulgraphs/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:50:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Total LibertyTax08.com Subscribers</title><link>http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/libertytax_members.html#comment-198565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;take this trash somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intrade: Electability For GOP candidates</title><link>http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/intrade_electability_rep.html#comment-173780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks oskar... but just to clarify... it's not my math... I was asked to graph this thing... but it's not my math or my idea.. the graph description links to the source.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html#comment-165332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you don't think the ron paul campaign has had an impact on online fundraising and organization... you're blind. someone could write a book about all the innovation that's been brought to politics by this campaign and its supporters... And if you think this has been a waste... well.... there's no help for you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html#comment-164753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you didn't just miss the point.. you're not even on the same continent as the point... why do you come here? you've left dozens of poorly thought out and useless comments here.. for someone who things RP hasn't changed anything, you sure have alot to say about him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rpc_three_day_compare.html#comment-164748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the graph is accurate....  if you want to accuse me of faking data, you better bring some evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;why are you so full of bile?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html#comment-159751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, fascist idiots with no understanding of freedom or the intent of our form of government.... but hey.. if you want to be a health nazi and tell people what to do at the point of a gun.... you'll fit right in with all the other "presidential" candidates, take your pick...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's funny that someone who hates Ron Paul so much would run around a site like this one leaving a dozen comments... don't you have a job?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:16:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html#comment-153621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;as noted in the graph description, this graph does not include offline donations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:40:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee Today (on+off)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_today.html#comment-131098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;their page says "lost data feed"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/precincts_and_leaders.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/precincts_and_leaders.html#comment-123742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would graph every candidates numbers if they made them available.. so far Huck and RP are the only candidates with the balls to do it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's valuable to see how we are performing against our competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's got nothing to do with advertising... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-119167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;no skin off my back... "I am a hollow reed, trouble blows through me like the wind"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 points for anyone who knows what TV show that's from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:35:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/feb_1_total.html</title><link>http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/feb_1_total.html#comment-119159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;none of that... this is a Patriots only web site :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;history would be the patriots going undefeated all the way! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-118201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there have been over 12 money bombs... some of them didn't even get to $100k this one is very successful... more successful that RudysReadingList which was organized by the same guy and had more time to spread....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I disagree with your opinion and perception of this strategy. I'm not 100% convinced of the money bomb phenomena... but I think it has value... record breaking days got us media attention and are fun for the grassroots.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:33:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-118184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's so you can see the shape of the curve... in order to have an interesting comparison... if you don't see the value... i don't really care :) I made it because it was interesting to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-118118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not to mention this is the 4th best fundraising day of the campaign and it was organized in just 10 days after the last one... how is it a failure? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-118116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;look at the front page where the other graph is that includes the "removed information"... uhg...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the title of this graph and the description both indicate there are days missing... what more do you want from me? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee Today (on+off)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_today.html#comment-118105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just think you're not understanding what happens to the graph on this scale...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;look how smooth the previous two days are on this scale:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/yesterday_vs_today_line.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/yesterday_vs_today_line.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/ye...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;also.. look at how much the donations per hour have varied:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/last_48_hours_donations.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/last_48_hours_donations.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/la...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and look at the variance here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/be...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;and here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/si...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;there is nothing nefarious going on... you are simply misinterpreting the graph... we're at 5-7 times the usual scale... see the size of the "avg day".... if we're making $5k in a good hour on a normal day... a $2,300 donation looks like a big jump... but when we're making $50-$70k an hour, $2,300 is barely a blip... follow me?  the "smoothness" you see is merely an artifact of scale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;look how smooth the huck curve is today: &lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_today.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_today.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;even though there are 3 big 10% jumps already, which I assume are offline numbers (I still don't know for sure what their process is) you hardly notice them... yesterday, they would have jumped right out at you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:07:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html#comment-117862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;er... not quarter... campaign.. 6 best days of the campaign&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html#comment-117861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how is it irrelevant? it's the 6th best day of the quarter, and this graph shows the 6 best days of the quarter... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:56:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Total Raised: Best Days (minus 3)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/best_days_minus_3.html#comment-117086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the point is to see the detail in the curve... which is obscured by the higher days... I think it's more interesting this way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;there is the other graph:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/six_best_days.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/si...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee (this month)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_month.html#comment-115988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's online totals only for RP... still not entirely sure of the status of Huck... it sure seems like he's adding in offline numbers... but I've heard the official word is (or was) that they are not adding in the offline numbers....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If anyone wanted to clear that up for me, I would appreciate it :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee Today (on+off)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_today.html#comment-111059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not smooth at all... changes slope throughout the day and has lots of jaggies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/jan_21_total.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ronpaulgraphs.com/jan_21_total.html"&gt;http://ronpaulgraphs.com/ja...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the larger the total/number of donations the less you see the smaller jumps... $2,300 is only a tenth of a percent of the amount we raised that day... the other big days show a like behavior.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The hard thing to explain are the MASSIVE spikes that happen within a few minutes in the huckabee data... if it's not offline donations then it's really weird... that never happens in the RP data. slope never changes that abruptly.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee (this month)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_month.html#comment-110416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the forum is here for arguments. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our foreign policy is an opposing ideology to most of what America stands for... has been for 60+ years&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 1951 the US took out Iran's ELECTED leader and installed a dictator which ultimately lead to the empowerment and rule of Khomeini... should there be no repercussions there for us?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have funded both sides of every conflict in that region for decades...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;we're friendly with the biggest terror supporting country in the world (Saudi)..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's just a couple examples of MANY where the US is asserting it's will over these nations.. who's way or the highway?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;isn't 9/11 as justifiable as our actions? we've killed more people with our actions, I assure you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think what they did was evil... but I think what we've done and what we're doing is also evil... none of it is justified.... there is plenty of blame to go around...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee (this month)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_month.html#comment-110391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How many wrongs make a right? Do you have an equation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How were the hundreds of thousands of dead Iraq civilians at fault? how was Iraq at fault at all? why aren't we invading Saudi (where all but a couple of the actual hijackers came from)? Why didn't we assassinate Bin Laden? Instead of doing something useful, we did exactly the wrongest thing we could think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You don't want "them" to pay... you want all Arabs and muslims to pay... you don't care where they come from or what involvement they had or did not have with 9/11... you want revenge, not justice...  This war has nothing to do with justice at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My point about indians/blacks/jews was that the same speech people who support the war use against muslims is the same type of language people used against those other groups to vilify them and justify their extermination or maltreatment on a massive scale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul vs. Mike Huckabee (this month)</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_month.html#comment-110362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;we've been fanning the flames since the 40's!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;your argument is like saying the solution to the attacking bear (which you angered by poking it in the eye) is to poke it in the eye some more...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the idea that "radical Islam" came out of nowhere and attacked for nothing defies reason and history. The idea that America has the obvious moral high ground against the "radical islamic terrorists" is preposterous... it's sticking your head in the sand and willfully ignoring 6 decades of history... don't the things that happened before 9/11/2001 matter? or how about the hundreds of thousands who have died since then, do they matter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Conservative Solutions" don't include preemptive war and massive attacks against basic civil liberties here at home... Huckabee is no conservative... fascist, maybe... conservative, not even close.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm really sick of this Fear based politicking...  they've got you so scared of the "islamic savages" you don't even care that your freedoms are evaporating and your grand children's money is being spent at an all time high... there are plenty of things to be afraid of.. but they don't live in caves in the middle east... they wear suits and work in washington.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;better alive and safe than free and dead, i guess, right? the founding fathers are rolling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html</title><link>http://ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_this_quarter.html#comment-109833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it doesn't currently include offline, as noted in the description... I might add it in later this week... &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:49:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>