<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for richjensen</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/richjensen/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/richjensen/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:44:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Game up!</title><link>http://metrotimes.com/music/game-up-1.1105381#comment-154049009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that's a comment!  Write on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reverb - Eric Grandy - Last Night: White Rainbow's R&amp;B Side-Project Purple and Green Light Up a Dance Party at Cairo Gallery</title><link>http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2011/02/last_night_white_rainbows_rb_s.php#comment-146772965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Status Update of the Day</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/02/03/facebook-status-update-of-the-day/#comment-140811999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice 'Good news" story.  Cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP: Gregoire, Kitzhaber Scrap Expensive Bridge Project</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/02/04/ap-gregoire-kitzhaber-scrap-expensive-bridge-project/#comment-140799743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except that your inversion obscures the class-based reality of CARS RULE's point. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:54:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP: Gregoire, Kitzhaber Scrap Expensive Bridge Project</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/02/04/ap-gregoire-kitzhaber-scrap-expensive-bridge-project/#comment-140792935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"McLiar" and "noob", these we should regard as wit?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP: Gregoire, Kitzhaber Scrap Expensive Bridge Project</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/02/04/ap-gregoire-kitzhaber-scrap-expensive-bridge-project/#comment-140788333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except that a) the 110,000 number you cite includes many tens of thousands of current commuter trips TO DOWNTOWN (where OMG! drivers DUMP THEMSELVES on CITY STREETS EVERYDAY!!) and b) with tolls, no downtown exit, etc., WSDOT's projection is that 20 years from now the tunnel will serve 60,000 trips.  Since 110 - 60 = 50....   OMG!! The dumping!! The dumping!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the madness the boosters keep repeating.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:36:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Velo Bus Driver: Light Rail Isn&amp;#8217;t Going to Flood Bellevue With &amp;#8220;Undesirables&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/01/17/velo-bus-driver-light-rail-isnt-going-to-flood-bellevue-with-undesirables/#comment-131698162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How do you know that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:17:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contrary to What You Might Believe</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/01/18/contrary-to-what-you-might-believe/#comment-130809272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hated by plutocrats, not a problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Velo Bus Driver: Light Rail Isn&amp;#8217;t Going to Flood Bellevue With &amp;#8220;Undesirables&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/01/17/velo-bus-driver-light-rail-isnt-going-to-flood-bellevue-with-undesirables/#comment-130800171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... didn't say that it was.  Just sharing the context in which I first encountered that particular opinion.  Kinda think it is more common than transit-supporters might suppose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also felt that my informants had the sense that their anxieties could be read as 'politically incorrect', ie segregationist, and so they were somewhat guarded about explaining their reasoning in detail.  Again, I think this is a pretty common set of symptoms for our locale: ungrounded fear and loathing of 'others' covered by a polite veneer of pseudo open-mindedness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Velo Bus Driver: Light Rail Isn&amp;#8217;t Going to Flood Bellevue With &amp;#8220;Undesirables&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/01/17/velo-bus-driver-light-rail-isnt-going-to-flood-bellevue-with-undesirables/#comment-130376349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, fear and logic don't have much in common.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Velo Bus Driver: Light Rail Isn&amp;#8217;t Going to Flood Bellevue With &amp;#8220;Undesirables&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://publicola.com/2011/01/17/velo-bus-driver-light-rail-isnt-going-to-flood-bellevue-with-undesirables/#comment-130260931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a more commonly held opinion than many people might believe.  I first heard it in reference to the monorail discussion a few years ago when a pleasant-seeming north-end couple explained how worried they were by reports that the future monorail stations would be magnets for crime and vandalism.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dreaming of A Universal Parking Impact Fee</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/10/12/dreaming-of-a-universal-parking-impact-fee/#comment-87010849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Building a revenue stream for more "good transportation stuff" is essential, and tying it to a tax on "bad transportation stuff" makes sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most straightforward thing would be to have a fuel tax, ie tax and reduce the poisonous emissions that make the planet, and our region, sick.  Unfortunately, a 1944 amendment to the Washington State Constitution (&lt;a href="http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Finance/fueltaxes.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Finance/fueltaxes.htm"&gt;Amendment 18&lt;/a&gt;) requires that all state funds generated from fuel taxes be spent on highway and road improvements, not more efficient transportation or development modes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A use fee on parking spaces might be the best way to quickly create strong market incentives to steer the region away from climate disaster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That seems like the fair and prudent thing to do for today's kids and the families they might like to have later in the century.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Pretty Classy Move</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/10/06/a-pretty-classy-move/#comment-86542139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So like, you are going around posting to various blogs (this one and Real Change) in town to make sure readers know you think Ms. Remmu has poor journalistic standards?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Weird, ugly hobby.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maps Show Racial Makeup of Major Cities, Including Seattle</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/09/21/map-post/#comment-80737321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're talking about a lot of my friends and neighbors.  The idea that they don't exist is absurd.  I don't get your point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maps Show Racial Makeup of Major Cities, Including Seattle</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/09/21/map-post/#comment-80657583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever the pigmentation of participants on this thread, the blue dots in the map (skewed toward Central and Southeast Seattle) represent residents of African descent, about 47,000 of them*.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't see them, that says something about the value of your observations and the comments you derive from them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/census2000/profiles/place/1605363000.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/census2000/profiles/place/1605363000.pdf"&gt;http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: In End Run Around McGinn, Conlin Moves Tunnel Forward</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/09/23/in-end-run-around-mcginn-conlin-moves-tunnel-forward/#comment-80545006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are the 16 SDOT positions related to this project?  Or was that just a further indication of the degree that vindictive pettiness trumps the public interest when it comes to implementing transportation policy in this community?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:10:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maps Show Racial Makeup of Major Cities, Including Seattle</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/09/21/map-post/#comment-80389218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Black people in Seattle, huh?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reeeeeaaaaalllllyyyyy?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:41:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://poplifereadings.tumblr.com/post/628760774</title><link>http://poplifereadings.tumblr.com/post/628760774#comment-78187992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet tip Josh!  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, look for POP LIFE 2.0 in Jan 2011.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bigger, badder and more inhabit-y...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:25:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Demographer Nerds!</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/09/09/hey-demographer-nerds/#comment-76403761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sexy data dump!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:01:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does McGinn&amp;#8217;s Potential Rail Plan Look So&amp;#8230; Familiar?</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/11/why-does-mcginns-potential-rail-plan-look-so-familiar/#comment-68212223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the monorail authority spent and lost money.  I was wrong about there being a surplus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I was correct that the monorail made money off the land sales.  The proceeds were applied to operating debts and reduced the duration of the car tab tax.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"With all but one parcel sold or under contract, the monorail project now stands to receive $68 million, $11 million more than it paid for the parcels two years ago."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/transportation/271111_monorail22.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.seattlepi.com/transportation/271111_monorail22.html"&gt;http://www.seattlepi.com/tr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May 22, 2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This whole Seattle transportation war, since Forward Thrust really, is just...  sad.  Penny smart, pound foolish, again and again and again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does McGinn&amp;#8217;s Potential Rail Plan Look So&amp;#8230; Familiar?</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/11/why-does-mcginns-potential-rail-plan-look-so-familiar/#comment-68188597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You make a solid point about the public entity that purchased the land and then made a handsome profit off the resales.  It was the monorail authority and not the City of Seattle.  Although, weren't those proceeds transferred to city accounts upon the liquidation of the Elevated Transit Authority?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please don't blame the masses (ie, "you people") for my oversight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My point was that the public agencies didn't "waste taxes" on those deals. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does McGinn&amp;#8217;s Potential Rail Plan Look So&amp;#8230; Familiar?</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/11/why-does-mcginns-potential-rail-plan-look-so-familiar/#comment-68125514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was disappointed when the city immediately dumped all the monorail land.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, because of fortuitous timing, the city made a tidy profit off those transactions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The market has since become depressed. Perhaps the real estate can be bought back even cheaper than before?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is certain though, is that you like to spout your anti-public jibber-jabber without the slightest consideration of available facts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i suggest you wait until you have some info before you pretend to offer info, Mr. (or Ms.) TheInfo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 03:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does McGinn&amp;#8217;s Potential Rail Plan Look So&amp;#8230; Familiar?</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/11/why-does-mcginns-potential-rail-plan-look-so-familiar/#comment-68121228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are suggesting football and baseball stadia for every neighborhood?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 03:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does McGinn&amp;#8217;s Potential Rail Plan Look So&amp;#8230; Familiar?</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/11/why-does-mcginns-potential-rail-plan-look-so-familiar/#comment-68120955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Losing population?  False.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 03:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Duh of the Day: Density Means Less Driving</title><link>http://publicola.com/2010/08/05/duh-of-the-day-density-means-less-driving/#comment-66853347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No more car-dependent diktats.  Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richjensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>