<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ricardomt</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ricardomt/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ricardomt/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:26:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Samsung crashes iPhone 4S block party, lures Aussies with $2 Galaxy S IIs</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/samsung-becomes-apples-neighbor-from-hell-lures-aussie-buyers/#comment-332704014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I see... You're right. Then the line would be limited to 50, not 10. Is that right? Monday through Friday, 10 phones a day, 50 phones for $2. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:26:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung crashes iPhone 4S block party, lures Aussies with $2 Galaxy S IIs</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/samsung-becomes-apples-neighbor-from-hell-lures-aussie-buyers/#comment-332697873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This might sound like a stupid comment, but... Aren't those Samsung lines always going to be limited to 10 people, while lines in front of Apple Stores can easily reach hundreds? Isn't it always going to look like they are still "loosing" despite of all the $2 efforts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EDIT - You guys just opened my eyes, it's 50, not 10! Monday through Friday, 10 phones a day... 50 on Monday, 40 on Tuesday, 30 on Wednesday, 20 on... well, you got the idea... :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Officially Unveils Galaxy Tab</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/09/02/samsung-galaxy-tab-2/#comment-88508185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am an Apple fanboy, Mac and iPod and iPhone and everything else Apple. But this is a seeexy device! I want it! Doing a quick math, it has a 170-180 ppi pixel density, which is not fantastic, but pretty decent. All I want is a 300+ ppi tablet to make it usable for reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:49:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Awesome Apple iPad Decals [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/06/13/ipad-decals-gallery/#comment-56514527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#10 not to be confused as a downgraded Android, okay? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4G to Come in White? [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/05/23/iphone-4g-white/#comment-51618524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OMG... This white iPhone is just plain ugly...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 14:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loic Le Meur Blog: iPad review after 24 hours (post+video)</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2010/04/ipad-review-after-24-hours-postvideo.html#comment-43440515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review, Loic! Honest and straightforward, from a real user!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:43:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Pulls Olympic Luge Logo After Backlash</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/02/13/google-luge-olympics/#comment-34125439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some people may get emotional about Google using the luge logo and I perfectly understand. This logo was probably already pre-cooked and scheduled to be deployed today and nobody at Google noticed the flaw and/or realized how bad the backlash could get...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:15:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - The Secret 2.0 
Watch this video to see what the...</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.com/post/238372936#comment-22481075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is actually addictive. The more I work my ass off, the happier I get, because I am passionate about what I am doing! Can't help working my ass off!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReoCities: One Man&amp;#8217;s Quest to Bring GeoCities Back from the Dead</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/28/reocities/#comment-21330890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was the owner of Hollywood/1406 but Yahoo! also shut down some neighborhoods a few years ago, forcing homeowners to move to the boring &lt;a href="http://www.geocities.com/yahooid" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.geocities.com/yahooid"&gt;http://www.geocities.com/ya...&lt;/a&gt; schema. I was one of the affected by this change. Am I going to be able to regain access to my old Hollywood address? It was home of the very first Woody Woodpecker (the cartoon) fan site ever, the World Wide Woody Woodpecker Website.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:45:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pete Cashmore Talks Windows 7 and Hulu on CNN Live [VIDEO]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/23/windows-7-cnn-live/#comment-20897730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is natural that Hulu and some other online media providers switch to a subscription-based model. &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt; has recently made the move and although I don't know how it reflected in their actual user base, was necessary for the survival of the company as a business. Hulu on the other hand generates WAY less pageviews and the ad model is a little different from that on &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt;, for example. I think it makes sense to charge for their content, specially if the price is competitive with those from Cable/DTH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Windows7, is it THAT great or was Vista just the "stinky goat in the room" that has just stepped out? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Android Search Just Became Awesome</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/09/android-quick-search-box/#comment-19719368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow... That one kicks Spotlight Search's ass big time. Time to catch up, Apple!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Go to Google.com?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/07/do-you-go-to-google-com/#comment-19296822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, same thing here... I have been always using Safari's search box, both on my Mac and iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - Where do all the advertisers go? 

GV is joined by...</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.com/post/206197112#comment-19265226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's it, Gary... Come on guys, is it really necessary for a major magazine to shut down for people to realize that THE SHIFT is happening RIGHT NOW? Geez! Cable television is next, folks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:24:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - The video trailer for my upcoming book Crush It</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.com/post/199538540#comment-17745190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a nice video! Awesome montage! Already ordered my copy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:44:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - Gary Vaynerchuk’s Startup Advice - BusinessWeek</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.com/post/191447367#comment-16910198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Short and straight to the point. Awesome interview, thumbs UP! For some reason, I think the interviewer doesn't match the guest at all... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:25:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Dominates Mobile WiFi Usage</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/31/iphone-wifi/#comment-15685981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite interesting to learn that the iPod Touch beats the iPhone in mobile devices Wi-Fi usage... Being an iPod Touch and an iPhone user myself, I do agree that having those devices online is what gives them the power. But I am really surprised that Android isn't on the list... Is this really accurate and trustable?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TomTom for iPhone Launches in NZ: Signals Own Demise?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/16/tomtom-iphone/#comment-14927226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly! That's the point! Both TomTom, Navigon and CoPilot will be using the hardware we have already paid for. And considering they will probably charge the yearly (approximately) $100 to keep our maps up-to-date, anything over $70 will sound abusive to me. Not even mentioning AT&amp;amp;T's turn-by-turn application which is "supposedly free" but charges a monthly fee.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TomTom for iPhone Launches in NZ: Signals Own Demise?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/16/tomtom-iphone/#comment-14920463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know if all the hype on the TomTom app is deserved. Just take a look at Navigon @ $70 and specially at CoPilot @ $35. They look pretty decent for a much lower price... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: lawn wrangler - I knew CS193P would get knocked out of the top...</title><link>http://lawnwrangler.tumblr.com/post/159418163#comment-14529530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ouch... I love Garfield, but it really hurts to see CS193P being knocked out by a cat. Almost a LOLcat...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ricardomt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:34:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>