<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rams</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rams/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rams/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:06:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Scripting News: New feature: Blog post sub-text!</title><link>http://scripting.com/stories/2010/06/11/newFeatureBlogPostSubtext.html#comment-56349601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sub-text is the new link. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Left brain, Right brain, and the other half of the story</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.blogspot.com/2009/09/left-brain-right-brain-and-other-half.html#comment-16553409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The link in "This is where I link in to yesterday's post on Risk and Opportunity. " starts with "ttp" instead of "http" &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Placeholder for Bad Hair Day #4</title><link>http://badhair.us/2009/07/16/00021.html#comment-12798617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks ok now - 10.36MB, previously it was downloading about 736kb or so. Not sure what happened. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Placeholder for Bad Hair Day #4</title><link>http://badhair.us/2009/07/16/00021.html#comment-12797977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mp3 file size incorrect - can you please fix it ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Java Wars, continued (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/07/08/theJavaWarsContinued.html#comment-12337270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Xmarks has gotten intrusive of late. On a page of google search results it inserts an icon against a specific link recommending it - It's very irritating. Like someone pointed out delicious solved this problem if you are ok with hosted bookmarks. The way you are pushing Xmarks is a bit contrived . Is Mitch Kapor a friend of yours ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:24:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Patchwork</title><link>http://designaday.tumblr.com/post/101747551#comment-8865137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The availability of high quality  open source software has made this problem severe.  Of the three startups I have worked for in the last six years, I can't act think  of too many instances where anything that really made the end user's life easier was attempted.  It was always 'Let's do it, because we can" and the primary factor that almost always enabled such thinking was the availability of free/open source software. Slapping an UI on pieces of open source held together with duct tape is not software development. Assembling gives a false sense of achievement without creating value.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If you don't like the news... (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/03/17/ifYouDontLikeTheNews.html#comment-7339123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I said the sources would take over the news. Not enough reporters covering the courtroom? The judge will report, as will the jurors, the attorneys, the plaintiff, the defendent. "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave, that summarizes well what you have actually been trying to say all these years. It actually solves the problem of the lack of domain expertise that most journalism suffers from. Beautiful. It's so simple.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Golden Image or Foil Ball?</title><link>http://madstop.com/2009/02/04/golden-image-or-foil-ball/#comment-6108363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;rPath has tried to address the problem in a very serious way, including a Python-based DSL for recipes and so on. But the learning curve is very steep - it requires an ops person with a programmer mentality, which is more of wishful thinking than reality.  Secondly even though conary works on other OSs rPath itself seems to base all their work on foresight linux (iirc that's the name). In a real data-center or IT dept, you very rarely have a choice of OS or OS flavour - you got to work with what you have got. Plus the license fee, There are quite a few start-ups that are trying to address this issue. Puppet seems to be light weight and pragmatic approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for addressing this issue, which actually leads us to the next one. Are Ops people equipped to meet the new challenges. Are they ever going to automate using at-least using semi-programmatic methods. I heard someone mentioning the term 'Devops' recently in a podcast. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rams</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:40:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>