<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rachelweidinger</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rachelweidinger/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rachelweidinger/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:39:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lawn and Garden Gear to Get Your Yard Cleaned Up</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/lists/lawn-and-garden-gear-to-get-your-yard-cleaned-up/#comment-6322506517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Garret &amp;amp; Wade broom is now $48.50 with a $21 shipping charge. Still a top pick?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:39:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Get Rid of Clothes Moths</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/blog/how-to-get-rid-of-clothes-moths/#comment-5552270514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m surprised there’s no mention of microwaving things here, only things without metal fasteners obviously. I’ve found it highly effective. There’s some good literature on it in museum fabric conservation. Faster than rewashing otherwise clean garments. Way cheaper than dry cleaning. I’m a big fan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be sure the microwave is very clean, so food doesn’t soil the clothes and attract moths. I do it for 3 min for larger garments (fisherman’s sweater) and 2 min for smaller things (cashmere sweater). Leave in microwave to stay hot for a minute or two and kill small beasts. Dry clothes only. Microwave power varies, so test it on something you’re not attached to before you throw in all your heirlooms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Vaccine and GMO Denial Should be Treated Equally</title><link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape/2014/08/07/vaccine-gmo-denial-treated-equally/#comment-1541534559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keith, I'm extremely disappointed that you convey the AAAS letter as an "overwhelming conclusion." It's very much not. See Doug Gurian-Sherman's post at the Union of Concerned Scientists &lt;a href="http://blog.ucsusa.org/a-contrary-perspective-on-the-aaas-board-statement-against-labeling-of-engineered-foods" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.ucsusa.org/a-contrary-perspective-on-the-aaas-board-statement-against-labeling-of-engineered-foods"&gt;http://blog.ucsusa.org/a-co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further, it's easy to find many statements from scientists that are in direct conflict with your post.  Many of those easily findable sources are linked here: &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies#cite_note-BMA-7" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies#cite_note-BMA-7"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if, after proper longitudinal studies, we do learn that there are no human health impacts of eating GMO foods (hooray!), there are certainly substantial ecosystem and economic impacts. Your conflating the anti vaccine movement with the anti GMO movement is irresponsible. My choice to not 'vaccinate' my children with GMO soy almost certainly lacks the significant negative impact of not vaccinating my children for tuberculosis.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:05:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strong Relationships With Grantees: Working With the Gates Foundation</title><link>http://www.impatientoptimists.org/Posts/2013/06/Grantee-Perceptions-Working-With-the-Gates-Foundation#comment-929316002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Broke link to latest Grantee Perception Report. Has 2010 in URL, but 2012 doesn't work either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reassess &amp;#038; Re-Engage: Listening Leads</title><link>http://gettingattention.org/2013/04/responsive-nonprofit-marketing/#comment-868389261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen, Nancy.  Seeing dozens of tweets that would be fine on a normal day, but look oblivious and self-centered today.  This is a great reason to always listen first.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Food Panels Not to Miss at SXSW 2012</title><link>https://foodtechconnect.com/2012/03/09/6-food-panels-not-to-miss-at-sxsw-2012/#comment-461452220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great roundup, thank you! This might be a good addition to your list: &lt;br&gt;Gaming the Environment for Positive Change with Philippe Cousteau&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP100610" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP100610"&gt;http://schedule.sxsw.com/20...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're rounding up links and resources for &lt;br&gt;Seafood Watch vs. Yelp: Future of Social Food at www,&lt;a href="http://socialfood.wikispaces.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="socialfood.wikispaces.com"&gt;socialfood.wikispaces.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.foodte.ch/post/7549618544</title><link>http://www.foodte.ch/post/7549618544#comment-250995776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting direction. What data would change your consumer behavior?  How do you get your information on sustainable agriculture practices when making a purchase?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Reflections on Jumo</title><link>http://amysampleward.org/2010/11/30/first-reflections-on-jumo/#comment-105391459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Re "I guess "due diligence" is very different outside of the foundation world though and a business is a business?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jumo is a fellow 501(c)3 nonprofit. See: &lt;a href="http://www.jumo.com/faq#about" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.jumo.com/faq#about"&gt;http://www.jumo.com/faq#about&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15% default must be part of their earned revenue/ sustainability plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Open Letter On Best Practices And Principles</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/02/an-open-letter-on-best-practices-and-principles.html#comment-6875459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Delighted to learn of this effort.  Been thinking about ethics and social tools quite a bit.  Puzzling on how social tools can (and should) hard wire in behavior paths that benefit users and help them to build the online presence users desire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Architecture Of Flow: Canonical Features Of Streaming Applications</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/02/the-architecture-of-flow-key-features-of-streaming-applications.html#comment-6406209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was reading Csikszentmihalyi's Flow on BART this morning, reflecting that &lt;a href="http://Tribe.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tribe.net"&gt;Tribe.net&lt;/a&gt; and Twitter are the only two community platforms that I've gotten to absolute absorption in, and starting to figure out what embedded values the platforms held that made them facilitate absolute absorption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for digging down in to the architecture of your version of flow applications.  Have you written anywhere about Csikszentmihalyi's concept of Flow?  I suspect your definition is different in important ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:32:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hunkering Down, Pushing Ahead</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/02/hunkering-down.html#comment-5783475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Crossed (the latest version of) my Rubicon last week, realizing that I have been fighting for the ideals of what I love--humanity, whalesharks, groves of coastal redwoods, abundant food--and that now we will all start actually losing some of them. On twitter: "Copia bankrupt, Scharffenberger shuttered, about to lose Saturday postal delivery. If someone kills all the whales, I'm quitting. Save good!" &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rachelannyes/status/1156948840" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/rachelannyes/status/1156948840"&gt;http://twitter.com/rachelan...&lt;/a&gt;  It seemed flip in the moment, and has since sunk deep into my core.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The game changed for me last week. I ate a steak, in mourning. And then I started really planning...must effect big change, and fast.  Looking forward to plotting with you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rachel Weidinger on Tijoy: Do Micro Donors Still Have Rights?</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/01/rachel-weidinger-on-tijoy-do-micro-donors-still-have-rights.html#comment-5607314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Tipjoy isn't just for nonprofits."  YES.  And it shouldn't be used for peer-to-peer fundraising campaigns on Twitter.  It is the wrong tool for lots of reasons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually using it on Twitter for personal tipping is another story, and I wish your start up the best of luck pursuing that line of business.  You set up your tool to carry out that purpose, and though it's of little appeal to me to use personally, it seems just fine for your intended use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rachelweidinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:21:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>