<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for qrush</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/qrush/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/qrush/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:50:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WNY Conference provides support to computer programmers</title><link>http://news.wbfo.org/post/wny-conference-provides-support-computer-programmers#comment-1013913130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Ashley! If you're looking to register, you can do so at &lt;a href="http://nickelcityruby.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://nickelcityruby.com"&gt;http://nickelcityruby.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mike Burns at Work</title><link>http://mike-burns.com/workcam/#comment-772143137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this even the real Mike Burns?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foreman as process manager, Pow as DNS server</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/40110176152#comment-761571224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why wouldn't you just use Pow's normal setup for hosting rack apps locally? Just seems like a lot of work when just symlinking $PWD to ~/.pow already is fine. Thin shouldn't be doing anything different than Pow, Passenger, etc locally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using the Draper Gem, Round One</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/29549610681#comment-626722050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree here, except for the preferring Draper part. Maybe I need to see its use in an app, but I don't feel that its added complexity is compelling enough to use. They're just views, there's more fun problems to solve elsewhere :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:28:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rounded Corners With Ruby Motion</title><link>http://bradylove.com/blog/2012/06/04/rounded-corners-with-ruby-motion/#comment-611143567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Went through a ridiculous amount of SO answers about rounding corners, and this was the only example I could get working. Thanks for posting this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mind-Bending Factories</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/28146418628#comment-607640023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MIND BENDING.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mind-Bending Factories</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/28146418628#comment-607627899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Feeling the same way here. This just feels really overly excessive. You're just building strings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't have anything better to say here, it's just there's no way I would lean on FactoryGirl to do this specific task. I guess if you had a lot of custom logic like this sprinkled around a test suite, it would be nicer to extract it into a method or out into FG.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opening an office in San Francisco</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/24675868820#comment-551803323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats guys!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:12:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read between the lines</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/22777096999#comment-525508909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Code reviews make a huge difference than this. Having someone else try to grok what you just wrote in a pull request goes a long way, and doesn't require another tool set/chain to get going.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to extract an intention-revealing name using Vim</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/22258289125#comment-516768299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not a constant?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:49:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Global min_messages</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/20367239936#comment-483886090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Upgrading to Rails 3.2 will also silence these, without the need for a setting per database/app.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Global .gitignore</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/18739402579#comment-456119022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;.*.swp&lt;br&gt;.*.swo&lt;br&gt;*.scratch.*&lt;br&gt;*.rbc&lt;br&gt;.DS_Store&lt;br&gt;*.swp&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Use Arguments In a Rake Task</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/18129303042#comment-446959400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've always found rake task arguments to be terribly gross.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was a pull request open forever ago that I doubt will ever get merged: &lt;a href="https://github.com/jimweirich/rake/pull/24" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/jimweirich/rake/pull/24"&gt;https://github.com/jimweiri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd rather just use Thor if you need to have some task run with arguments...it's already in Rails and the DSL is cleaner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Derive #inject for a better understanding</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/17782192029#comment-442345976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea what you said here but I like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Factory Girl 2.4 Goes Meta</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/15781666382#comment-410045055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome job Josh! What version of Ruby are those benchmarks using?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use Bundler&amp;#8217;s binstubs!</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/15346721484#comment-406315217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mostly because there will be a lot of unused files/clutter in bin/. I'd rather only keep what I care about: rake, bundle, cap, etc, and not *every* single executable that every gem in my Gemfile has.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use Bundler&amp;#8217;s binstubs!</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/15346721484#comment-402247660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This tends to install way too many bin stubs in our bin/ directory that we don't care about. &lt;br&gt;The pattern we've been using is:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;echo "bin/stubs" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; .gitignore&lt;br&gt;bundler install --binstubs=bin/stubs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And then copy the binstubs you need out of bin/stubs. (You only need to run that once, bundler remembers it in .bundle/config).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Bundler 1.1 will be much faster - Pat Shaughnessy</title><link>https://patshaughnessy.net/2011/10/14/why-bundler-1-1-will-be-much-faster#comment-382399143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keith, if you're serious about this and making it better, let's talk about how to improve it. I originally wrote the server side stuff that Bundler uses and it's definitely meant to be an iterative process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My email is nick@quaran.to, or just jump on freenode, I'm in the #rubygems channel. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:06:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Durable Document Store You Didn&amp;#8217;t Know You Had, But Did</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/13829210385#comment-380378881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How does the XML parsing speed compare to Nokogiri? Basically, I'm wondering if keeping the XML around on the filesystem, reading it, parsing it would be as fast (or faster).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://cadeparade.com/post/13777670140</title><link>http://cadeparade.com/post/13777670140#comment-379676762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice views!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:12:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How-To: Quick Rails Benchmarking</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/12241426497#comment-354338493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where does the `gcdata` patch come from, or does RVM just work some match to make it happen?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:33:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Danger, Danger: High Voltage! Use Rails 3.1 for Static Sites</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/11744619917#comment-347083640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The whole point is that I *want* to use the asset pipeline...if not, then sure I'd rather use that or Jekyll.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test Rake Tasks Like a BOSS</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/11957424161#comment-345970861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This feels like an awful lot of effort for me, when all of this could be tested from a class level inside of the application. Why not just say `UserReportGenerator.generate` and test the behavior in there instead of needing to stub/fake out Rake?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously, I understand it's important to verify your code is doing what it's doing, but this 1) locks you down to rake and 2) is really brittle with a lot of stubbing/mocking :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Bundler 1.1 will be much faster - Pat Shaughnessy</title><link>https://patshaughnessy.net/2011/10/14/why-bundler-1-1-will-be-much-faster#comment-336892945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're also forgetting about the 100s of network calls to each gemspec file :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:32:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Bundler 1.1 will be much faster - Pat Shaughnessy</title><link>https://patshaughnessy.net/2011/10/14/why-bundler-1-1-will-be-much-faster#comment-336849367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome writeup, Pat. I think this is probably just "Version 1.0" of making Bundler better. The awesome part about Gemcutter/&lt;a href="http://Rubygems.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Rubygems.org"&gt;Rubygems.org&lt;/a&gt; is that now we can use Ruby to make our own tools faster, and everyone in the community benefits. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>