<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for qazi</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/qazi/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/qazi/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:40:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Install Firefox 4 beta 2 in Ubuntu using PPA</title><link>http://linuxhub.net/2010/07/install-firefox-4-beta-2-in-ubuntu-using-ppa/#comment-106256982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow thanks, this had me stumped for some time now&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qazi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social responsibility requires unified approach, not double standards</title><link>http://www.socialbridges.org/2008/11/12/social-responsibility-requires-unified-approach-not-double-standards/#comment-3979503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Asif, Thanks for stopping by and making an effort to help us calrify this post, how ever&lt;br&gt;there is a huge difference between propoganda and a news from inside information. The only way this can be called a propoganda is if the concerned organizations them selves come forward and prove with facts that these allegations are wrong. &lt;br&gt;Its ironic that on one side you are ok with organizations not exposing information (According to their own standards)  but can be a cause to harm for public health but on the other hand you are questioning the age old methodology still very much used in all forms of media and journalis of insider info. I guess saad did what ever a journalist does when he hears about any such info, he contacted their concerned departments regarding the fact checking of his story, if they had any i ssues with it we did give them a chance to give their side of story. I would have questioned Saad's intentions if he had not taken such a step and published the story without contacting the other party and giving them chance to clarify.&lt;br&gt;Again, this is the most transparent medium, the company representatives can come in any time and pitch in their part of the story in comments. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qazi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An interview with Ms. Valerie Khan of Acid Survivors Foundation: Working towards a Pakistan free of acid victims</title><link>http://www.socialbridges.org/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-ms-valerie-khan-of-acid-survivors-foundation-working-towards-a-pakistan-free-of-acid-victims/#comment-2747694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shireen, I hope Massarat's team is also doing well, lets not do any personal attacks here.&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qazi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An interview with Mr. Misbah Uddin Chohan - Regional Manager, The Citizens Foundation</title><link>http://www.socialbridges.org/2008/09/02/an-interview-with-mr-misbah-uddin-chohan-regional-manager-the-citizens-foundation/#comment-2101795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Junaid i guess it all depends on your performance, if you are successful i am sure a lot of corporates will be willing to put their name with you, how ever if some body is just starting up and does not have credential will these corporates take the risk of putting their name that is i guess a question.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qazi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>