<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for prufrok</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/prufrok/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/prufrok/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:07:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Edythe</title><link>http://furryrabbits.tumblr.com/post/55714097#comment-3221762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gulp.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:07:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/54277895#comment-3030818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is so unsurprising. It was really over the top.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/53312763#comment-2899549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That made me snort Propel Fitness Water through my nose. Bravo, Miss Grace. Bravo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:55:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/53194261#comment-2882358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, honey (that's not condescending, y'all, I'm talking to my wife) -- I was reaching for the schoolyard analogy and couldn't  quite get it. And you're right, I think Moe does that on a regular basis. I think that in politics, it is valid to answer your opponent's slams as often as possible. In these situations, though, it's precisely what you said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am Not Kidding</title><link>http://bowlingalleylawyer.tumblr.com/post/52510767#comment-2770354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It just isn't clear. I vaguely remember from one of the music history classes I took in college that the story was that he wasn't supposed to be a castrati, that SOMETHING happened, etc. There's doubt about that, if you look at Wikipedia or find the rare, salacious take on famous singers (usually a very dusty book lurking in some used bookstore in the Northeast somewhere). The spin always was that the Church put the kibosh on the castrati thing BIG TIME by the time Rossini was flourishing, which would have been the early 1800s. Their heyday was Handel's time, about 60 years earlier. But with Moreschi, it could be that his folks got some sort of weird wild hair and decided they wanted to see if you could still preserve that boy soprano sound. Well, hell. Now you've got me curious. Just when I thought I was kind of out of music, the closet scholar in me has begun rearing his scary head again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:46:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: mabel moments</title><link>http://mabelmoments.tumblr.com/post/52235472#comment-2729572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I aims ta pleeze. Even if the very idea of castrati makes me squeamish.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/51595472#comment-2588072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bjorling is actually my all-time favorite. But for this aria, and for a lot of Verdi, I want to hear a voice like Giacomini's. But as a tenor, I have tried to emulate Bjorling's sound, which was lyric but heroic, and healthy too. Giacomini was awesome in his prime, but it wasn't really a vocally healthy sound. He almost sounds like a bass who managed to push his voice into the tenor register. I love that, but I know it wasn't good for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/51262129#comment-2525659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I should add -- I've realized one thing about this site -- I had to have a place where I didn't feel obligated to write about any one thing or another, and where I could say whatever I wanted and not feel pressed to elaborate. Because my other writing is work, I need a place where I can be elliptical. Where I can throw out a random, goofy thought, no matter if it makes sense or not. That's this site. Hope that explains where I'm coming from a little better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/51262129#comment-2525608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not getting into it. A fraction of people who read my true crime sites read this one. On my popular sites I sometimes feel constrained to explain some things because I have so many readers. Not here. I'm just not. I'm not going to blog about it, or get into it much, anymore (If you look in my archives, you will find a couple of recent, political posts -- made before I got tired of the subject). Politics bore me, in general.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a journalist I don't cover politics in general, and I've never signed anything for anyone for whom I've written that constrains me from expressing a view, so I will state who I'm voting for. But I'm really sorry -- I don't feel inclined or obligated to discuss it. I don't like arguing politics and find most political arguments tiresome and irritating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the record, though, I've voted Republican over the last 20 years or so much more often than I've voted Democrat. If I were to register, I'd register Independent. And that will never, ever change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:35:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging Via Typewriter. - I must admit to never thinking about the 17 other...</title><link>http://inothernews.tumblr.com/post/50769086#comment-2434705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude. I aims ta please. And edumacate. I think my inner music major has begun lately to rebel against the writerly-ness of my life. This is how he makes himself known.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/50736260#comment-2434600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I bet they're hiding something about this discovery, like he titled it "Essen Meine Scheisse II" or some such thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/50637078#comment-2433796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recommended because I really need to hear the piano with the voice in this piece, and it didn't sound right on the speakers I had. Sounded perfect on headphones, though. Thought the song might have been recorded with rather low levels.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/50409496#comment-2390680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got much love for my homey, yo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/50049502#comment-2335647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yakety sax would have been funny on this video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/49709438#comment-2307503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mary, did you selectively misread or just plain old misread what I wrote? The title of the post reads "EMOTIONALLY retarded vulture-like."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am offended that you jumped in without double-checking yourself on that comment. Saying someone is EMOTIONALLY retarded has no relation to the pejorative use of the word retarded. Mr. Morson demonstrated the emotional retardation native to one too many journalists when he tweeted that funeral. As a journalist myself I understand the need to be objective and not involve yourself in the emotion inherent in a story, but I've seen far too many instances where it looked as though the journalist in question just didn't have the empathy in the first place. To be emotionally retarded is to literally have your emotional development stunted. The literal meaning of the word retarded in this instance has little relation to the uglier meaning of the word.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I have an autistic sister, son, and a daughter with Asperger's Syndrome. I would not, and in this case did not use that word in the sense you implied. Try learning a little about a person before you jump to conclusions. Or better, try just ACTUALLY READING AND UNDERSTANDING ALL THE WORDS THEY WROTE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RMN &amp;#8216;Tweets&amp;#8217; the funeral of 3-year old boy</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/7717/rmn-tweets-the-funeral-of-3-year-old-boy/#comment-2283906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vultures tweet. Who knew?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#039;m not voting Republican this year...</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/48198326#comment-2017277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're right. If his style in those press conferences is any indication, he'll be a formidable opponent for any Dem who faces him in a presidential race in the future. I've grown more liberal as I've aged, but I was impressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#039;m not voting Republican this year...</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/48198326#comment-2017274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're right. If his style in those press conferences is any indication, he'll be a formidable opponent for any Dem who faces him in a presidential race in the future. I've grown more liberal as I've aged, but I was impressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:09:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/48217136#comment-1996917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was being facetious. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poor MSNBC</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/47831929#comment-1910710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Force of habit. I've watched both conventions since 1976. I am usually fairly apolitical, but when it comes time to elect the president, I make it a point to watch the conventions and as much coverage as possible from there on out. Then, after the election, I usually just go back to hating politics again, no matter who wins.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:06:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Huff's Random Lunatic News</title><link>http://randomlunaticnews.com/post/40474625#comment-785750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was Nikola Tesla's death ray, Jenny. That's what it was, I'm tellin' ya. Toss a xanax for me, wouldja?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve "Random Lunatic" Huff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>