<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for prescient11</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/prescient11/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/prescient11/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:49:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NY Middle School Forces Children To Ask Same Gender For A Kiss During &amp;#8220;Anti-Bullying&amp;#8221; Class&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://weaselzippers.us/141223-ny-middle-school-forces-children-to-ask-same-gender-for-a-kiss-during-anti-bullying-class/#comment-875739936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fuck these people.  Pedophiles of the worst order.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:49:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867532563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amused:  I wrote a larger reply at the end.  Fyi.  Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867531592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is even scarier for Britons is that they have no right of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The simple truth about gun control is that if you could point to one law that would stop this, most Americans would seriously consider it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there is not one good argument for anything that was proposed.  Not one solid, solitary reason.  Nothing.  In fact, if anything, there are logical reasons supported by facts, not emotion, for allowing looser restrictions on guns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More armed, responsible citizens is a very good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:12:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867527632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is not really an exception to the principle.  It is more the meeting of principle with limited government power.  Two principles colliding.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a woman is raped or the pregnancy is the result of incest, pretty much another form of rape, then this has been forced upon her and I do not think it is the government's place to interfere.  But if something like that is to be done, then it must be done immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with your concept of reason.  Indeed.  But it can't be until we are self-aware, because babies are not self-aware until sometimes a year or two.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was raised Christian.  Then became an atheist and was fairly socialistic/communist.  Then I came back to faith.   It is because only faith makes sense.  Ironic as it sounds, reason and logic, and frankly the facts of life, made me convinced that there is something else out there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And really, of all the religions, Christianity is the only one that made sense.  Given that your an educated person, I would encourage you to give it more thought.  Do I know for a fact about heaven and hell, etc., obviously not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I do know one undeniable fact - you, I, the whole world will soon be dead and buried, our flesh rotting in the ground.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From abortion to gay marriage, I do not seek to impose my religious views on my countrymen.  That would be very wrong.  However, if we cannot talk about these subjects in a frank and honest manner, then, to rely on G.K. Chesterton, one never knows why the "wall" was there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck on your journey, my email is prescient11@yahoo.com  if you ever want to discuss faith matters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867522149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's deep commentary.  Do Brits no longer believe in self-defense or is the UK an island of unicorns and fairies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or do you just submit to any criminal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why don't you mind your own business and don't worry about our basic civil rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While you were playing cricket you became a subject.  Very sad indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:55:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867518122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have no misconception, President Food Stamp's agenda is cold and calculated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are correct that they are USING these emotions to try and steal. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They did the exact same thing in Britain except in the UK it worked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867517446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, Pavel doesn't believe that anyone could climb a mountain or do whatever physical or mental tasks would be required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's personally surveyed hundreds of various countries' special forces and found out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He's writing a book all about it.  /sarc&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867515155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, because having an armed guard at a school to protect kids is CRAZY....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why do we even have armed guards?  Oh yeah, right.  Politicians need them, banks need them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But our kids, nah.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:42:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867514527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I'm an American robot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You must have thought really hard before writing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your genius.  You really add something of value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867513456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Knife crime is all the rage....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;50% of burglaries in the UK are "hot" meaning people are at home.  It's only 10% in the US.  Wonder why?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And UK police routinely fudge (downplay) the stats so you can't even trust them.  Weapon of choice is not recorded until there is a conviction or some such nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, the UK does include a lot of ninny stuff in its definition of assault, such as slap-fighting, so the violent number is probably inflated quite a bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867512323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ironic, a Brit talking about censors to a free citizen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tell me, what were the rights secured during that little "civil war"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But of course, you have no debate, no answer, nothing.  All you can do is resort to personal attack and cite the same two minute hate that is all you people ever have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bentham was a quack and completely incorrect, but he was a founding father of socialism.  Something that has been totally rejected.  So I'll stick with Lord Blackstone and refer you back to what was actually written on the paper regarding preserving the right to keep arms, which of course was one of the enumerated rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Limited government is a must.  But does an unborn child not have any rights?  In America and I believe in Britain, an unborn child has the rights to inheritance in probate.  Could a pregnant mother kill her unborn child so that all the money would go to her.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your failure is to recognize an unborn child as an individual.  I do.  However, my own personal position if that a pregnancy is the result of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother, then abortion would be permissible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, no.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:37:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867507645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you a broken record?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867507412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pot calling kettle?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:29:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867507140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No anonymous internet commenter who has met hundreds of special ops guy, I'm not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But if it ever got bad enough, so be it.   I'd rather have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I think any person who has an ounce of sense would arrive at the exact same conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But giving up on the idea because it would be "too tough" and "never work" is not in my blood.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867506086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Boy"?  Raaaccciissstttt.  hahahahaha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867505683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How many millions do socialists have to kill before they finally leave everyone alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Socialists are the most racist, hateful people I have ever met.  The history books are full of their crimes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867503918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, all valid criticisms.  But life ain't easy.  You do what you have to do.  People adapt. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, never say never.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly, Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without restriction, but now can only do so if they have a special license.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:24:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867502324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have a screw loose or what?  Listen, I'll explain this to you one more time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Afghanistan. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; An armed militia can make life very difficult even for the best military in the world.  And we're fighting foreigners.   If our military was shooting people in Kansas, our own people, the situation would be changed even more in favor of a rebellion because, despite your "opinion," there are a lot of people that wouldn't stand for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867500995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Silly me, I suppose Lord Blackstone and that silly enumerated paper of rights was just, what, a sidenote?  I should have known.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as fear goes, your great quest is so funny.  To think, a party that believes in lifestyles that do not promote having children and otherwise staunchly supports the wholesale slaughter of its members babies is going to inherit the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure it will.  And oh, the great savior of the left are the millions of illegals, eh?  The birthrate for Mexican women is now below the US birthrate, where it used to be 7 kids per woman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Socialism/communism/the boot stomping on a human face forever is in its death throes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You just don't know it yet.  Your "media" has helped staunch the decay, but not for long.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:19:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867498299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.  If that was the case, I'm curious why the Soviets created a "national gun registry" and then of course confiscated all the guns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You see, and this is a direct quote from Lenin, the gun registry was a trick to get the bourgeoius to comply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And once they had collected all the guns they slaughtered tens of millions of their own minority population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I digress, what was your point?  Oh, that one side loses in a battle.  Yes, conceded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867496680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed.  But apparently there are no tears for dead Mexican children.  Or dead black children in the city of Chicago - which has the most stringent gun control in the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is only dead white children that matter.  And apparently he needed 20 of them so the pile of graves would be high enough for him to spout his leftist agenda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Absolutely shameful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:12:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867495714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with these articles and commentary is that they truly fail to understand the issue, even Democrats have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bill Clinton warned them on this.  The GOP took congress back for the first time since the Great Depression because in large part the 1994 gun ban AND the health care fiasco of proposals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sound familiar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many democrats and liberals are against this idiocy.  Even the ACLU, hardly a conservative stalwart, came out against the bill.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:11:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867493484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed, how could a rag tag ill-equipped militia ever fight against a well-organized military superpower. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh wait, Afghanistan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously no cake walk.  But it can be done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867492653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed.  Many do not realize this but real liberals are also against such nonsense.  Hence the name, liberal.  A name that has been defiled by marxist/leftist/statist radicals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:05:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama can't pass gun control despite 90 per cent support. Truly, he is a lame-duck president</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100212724/barack-obama-cant-pass-gun-control-despite-90-per-cent-support-truly-he-is-a-lame-duck-president/#comment-867491646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You cannot be serious?  They have primary schools in Britain, no?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You talk so much about fear it must run through you.  I talk of knowledge, and facts. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is called being practical and realistic.  Time and again tyrannies have arisen. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You appear to be arguing that you would rather be in a lifeboat without an oar, because sometimes people can use an oar to hurt others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Forget the US.  Look at Switzerland.  There they have actual assault weapons in many homes, 3rd highest rate of gun ownership in the world.  And yet their murder rate was below Norway's (even before the massacre).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as your question (limited guns vs. unlimited guns), you cannot be serious?  Millions upon millions have been slaughtered once they were disarmed.  Again, your country fought an entire civil war and one of the core rights that was preserved was the right of a citizen to keep arms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is history.  I will leave you with Benjamin Franklin's thoughts on the matter.  Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.  Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I, for one, shall take liberty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prescient11</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>