<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for powelstock</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/powelstock/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/powelstock/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 21:14:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith First Reviews: Donald Glover &amp; Maya Erskine Shine in ‘Compelling’ Reboot, Critics Say</title><link>https://editorialadmin.rottentomatoes.com/article/mr-mrs-smith-first-reviews/#comment-6384337539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bullseye!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 21:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to fix Google Chrome’s ‘Nearly up-to-date’ infinite loop issue on Windows</title><link>https://chromeunboxed.com/how-to-fix-google-chrome-infinite-update-loop-issue#comment-6319307927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Done and done! Many thanks for your help. Kind of amazing that this is still an issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 19:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Were Voting “NO” On Leaving Civil Service. Here’s Why.</title><link>https://www.bloggingbelmont.com/2023/11/were-voting-no-on-leaving-civil-service-heres-why/#comment-6317635175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Consider me a signatory. I will vote no, simply because we have not been presented with any plan for leaving Civil Service. As noted in the SCIG report, this is what every other town that has left Civil Service has done. A yes vote is a vote for a pig in a poke. Do better, BoS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 16:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saving salters and saving New England</title><link>https://www.tu.org/magazine/saving-salters-and-saving-new-england/#comment-5358827966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen!! What a great outcome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:16:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trouble Signing In?</title><link>https://blog.activeinboxhq.com/2019/08/15/trouble-signing-in/#comment-4586682707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same as everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gold Rush Zebra Trout in France! We’re back!</title><link>http://www.rodtrip.com/2017/11/29/gold-rush-zebra-trout-in-france-were-back/#comment-4485726325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try contacting Nick at &lt;a href="http://gourmetfly.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="gourmetfly.com"&gt;gourmetfly.com&lt;/a&gt;. He can set you up with a guide on the Loue (and many other locations in France and Spain).&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 17:27:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Many Victories in a Narrow Defeat</title><link>https://www.bloggingbelmont.com/2019/04/many-victories-in-a-narrow-defeat/#comment-4411603246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Paul. A heartbreaking loss. The jingoistic flag-waving was appalling, but this too shall pass. I appreciate your drawing out the silver lining!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 22:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Budgeting Apps and Tools</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-budgeting-apps-and-tools/#comment-4300767441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For the next update of this article, the authors should note that YNAB will no longer honor their $50/yr offer for previous users. They now offer a 10% discount, which is peanuts and, of course, does not preclude future subscription price increases. I used the offline version of YNAB for many years and found it useful as a tool and as a budgeting philosophy, despite its limitations. The last version of that (v4) is no longer supported, so I'm not going to keep putting data into that. The online version makes me nervous, in part for the reasons given below about dicey financial institution import and seeming indifference to the security issues of keeping one's financial data in the cloud. I understand their move to a subscription model, but at this price point, YNAB no longer represents a value proposition for me. It was good while it lasted, and anyone who can afford it should give it a look, if only to check out their approach to budgeting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MA Weather: 1 to 2 Feet Of Snow Expected This Weekend</title><link>https://patch.com/massachusetts/boston/ma-weather-1-2-feet-snow-expected-weekend#comment-4290795886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Patch will have an updated list of school closings on Monday as they come." My crystal ball tells me with 100% certainty that all MA schools will be closed on Monday. I will bet any amount of money. Please pm me if you want a piece of the action.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
		Trump’s Collusion With Russia Could Be Hiding in Plain Sight	</title><link>https://www.rollingstone.com/?p=779262#comment-4288180468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty awful, eh? You may need to lower your expectations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alan Dershowitz: Did Michael Flynn lie? Or did the FBI act improperly?</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/421634-alan-dershowitz-did-michael-flynn-lie-or-did-the-fbi-act-improperly#comment-4246053878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both articles are perfectly clear. Something in your mind seems to want to make them more complicated than they actually are, presumably in order to reach a conclusion to which you are irrationally wedded. Good luck with that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alan Dershowitz: Did Michael Flynn lie? Or did the FBI act improperly?</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/421634-alan-dershowitz-did-michael-flynn-lie-or-did-the-fbi-act-improperly#comment-4246051206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am only commenting on the article that was linked to. I am not going to read the man's entire opus in order to reply to a comment on a comment. That said, McCarthy has also trafficked in some pretty ludicrous conspiracy theories, including the idea that Bill Ayers authored Obama's book and an entire book claiming that the Obama administration was promoting Sharia Law. That's some pretty crazy batsh*t right there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alan Dershowitz: Did Michael Flynn lie? Or did the FBI act improperly?</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/421634-alan-dershowitz-did-michael-flynn-lie-or-did-the-fbi-act-improperly#comment-4246041834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Irrelevant. That piece attacks an argument that I have not made, namely that "there is no such thing as a perjury trap." Did you even read it, or did you just automatically link to it because it was published by The National Review?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alan Dershowitz: Did Michael Flynn lie? Or did the FBI act improperly?</title><link>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/421634-alan-dershowitz-did-michael-flynn-lie-or-did-the-fbi-act-improperly#comment-4246034844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Prof. Dershowitz's argument is misleading and assumes its own conclusion. He assumes that the sole piece of information the investigators wanted was a yes or no answer to the question of whether Flynn was lying. That's pretty unlikely! Much more likely, they were trying to get as much relevant information as they could from Flynn. In order to do so, they are not obliged to tell Flynn everything they already know. That would simply be ridiculous and make it impossible to investigate anything. The fact that Flynn proceeded to lie about *anything* under these circumstances is obviously an attempt to obstruct the investigation. If he weren't "singing" he would rightly be going up the river for a loooong time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: German grammar and baking combine in new course</title><link>http://brandeishoot.com/2018/11/01/german-grammar-and-baking-combine-in-new-course/#comment-4177326069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One important addition: In addition to being a great teacher, Prof. von Mering is also a GREAT baker!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 20:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rod Rosenstein Must Recuse After Trump 25th Amendment Revelation - Bloomberg</title><link>https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/rod-rosenstein-must-recuse-after-trump-25th-amendment-revelation#comment-4108081491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try looking at ALL the evidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rod Rosenstein Must Recuse After Trump 25th Amendment Revelation - Bloomberg</title><link>https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/rod-rosenstein-must-recuse-after-trump-25th-amendment-revelation#comment-4108080403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Live by the sleaze, die by the sleeze.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rod Rosenstein Must Recuse After Trump 25th Amendment Revelation - Bloomberg</title><link>https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/rod-rosenstein-must-recuse-after-trump-25th-amendment-revelation#comment-4108079890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that to call exercising constitutional provisions of the law 'radical' is ridiculous. At the same time, it should be noted that the 25th Amendment only took effect in 1967--no 'founders' involved!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rod Rosenstein Must Recuse After Trump 25th Amendment Revelation - Bloomberg</title><link>https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/rod-rosenstein-must-recuse-after-trump-25th-amendment-revelation#comment-4108074726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Typical Trumpster conspiracy theorizing. Reality beckons; open your eyes, citizen!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rod Rosenstein Must Recuse After Trump 25th Amendment Revelation - Bloomberg</title><link>https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/rod-rosenstein-must-recuse-after-trump-25th-amendment-revelation#comment-4108072947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An anonymous source is not the same as no source.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fish Longer and Harder With Simms Right Angle® Footbed</title><link>http://wadingroom.com/fish-longer-and-harder-with-simms-right-angle-footbed/#comment-3753838312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Amaconda I have definitely seen inserts sold separately for about $20/pair. This article does make is sound like Simms also offers wading boots with this tech built in. If I were you, I'd check the Simms website under wading boots. Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:09:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selectmen to Accountability: Drop Dead!</title><link>https://bloggingbelmont.com/2017/09/selectmen-to-accountability-drop-dead/#comment-3514729965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Williams has been a real disappointment. He came in on a wave of protest against the BoT's composition at the time, in the same election that passed the override. I voted for him, too, but I have to admit that I had my doubts about where he stood on much of anything. I still don't know where he stands on much of anything. I'm grateful that Adam Dash has had the intelligence to perceive the disfunction on the BoT and the Planning Board and the courage to speak about it and vote accordingly. Let's keep this shameful episode in mind as the next BoT election approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NPR: 25 Million Votes For Clinton &amp;#8216;Completely Fake&amp;#8217; &amp;#8211; She Lost Popular Vote</title><link>https://yournewswire.com/npr-25-million-fake-clinton-votes/#comment-3446276974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FIrst of all, it still means "*suffering* unto you" (a threat, i.e., you shall suffer misery, usually by the hand of god), not "fearfulness unto you." Moreover, you didn't use it in that phrase, so fear doesn't enter the picture at all. And it's "you're," not "your." It's like remedial English class around here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NPR: 25 Million Votes For Clinton &amp;#8216;Completely Fake&amp;#8217; &amp;#8211; She Lost Popular Vote</title><link>https://yournewswire.com/npr-25-million-fake-clinton-votes/#comment-3445655960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Woe is fearfulness." Also wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill Proposes Way to Make Walmart Pay for its Multi-Billion Dollar Food Stamp Subsidy</title><link>https://bloggingbelmont.com/2017/06/bill-proposes-way-to-make-walmart-pay-for-its-multi-billion-dollar-food-stamp-subsidy/#comment-3371201241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Needless to say, it will not garner a single GOP vote. Will it even get to the floor? Of course, I realize that the main purpose is to raise awareness of these practices--and very much hope the bill does that, at least!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">powelstock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>