<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for policyinnovations</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/policyinnovations/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/policyinnovations/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 16:40:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Agricultural Subsidies and Trade: The Key Alternatives</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01402#comment-2606004606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Giselle,&lt;br&gt;You will need to ask Dr. Peter M. Rosset (the author) for permission to repost any content from the pdf file. Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 16:40:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Agnostics in the Climate Foxhole</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/00374#comment-2242469573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aprove&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Farmer Perspectives on the Local Food System</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/00305#comment-1703353269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your comment, Nancy! Great insight!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Smaller Humans Are in Our Future</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/00295#comment-1693162391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Phil, thank you for your comment!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At Policy Innovations we always welcome counter-arguments and differing opinions. We believe they enrich the debate. However, we encourage our readers to use respectful language when making their comments. Even though we see the value of your comment and the point you are making, we would appreciate a more considerate approach when talking about other human beings! Thank you for reading!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nuclear, Not Fracking, Is The Answer to China's Future Energy Needs</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/00302#comment-1693147957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your comment!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here some further reading and links to useful articles reflecting on waterless fracking. Existing literature yields contradictory results on the risks of using propane instead of water as a fracking method.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20111104/gasfrac-propane-natural-gas-drilling-hydraulic-fracturing-fracking-drinking-water-marcellus-shale-new-york" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20111104/gasfrac-propane-natural-gas-drilling-hydraulic-fracturing-fracking-drinking-water-marcellus-shale-new-york"&gt;http://insideclimatenews.or...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/a-fracking-method-with-fewe-water-woes/?_r=0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/a-fracking-method-with-fewe-water-woes/?_r=0"&gt;http://dotearth.blogs.nytim...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.catskillmountainkeeper.org/our-programs/fracking/whats-wrong-with-fracking-2/fracking-with-liquid-propane-gas/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.catskillmountainkeeper.org/our-programs/fracking/whats-wrong-with-fracking-2/fracking-with-liquid-propane-gas/"&gt;http://www.catskillmountain...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As regards to Malthus, it would be something in the middle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you again for reading and contributing to the debate!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:31:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electric Bicycles Moving from Niche to Mainstream</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/innovations/data/00268#comment-1648213373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Approved&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:56:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Know It Works, so Let’s Keep Women’s Health Central in Global Development</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/00291#comment-1641244041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Approved&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: China Could Move First To Geoengineer The Climate</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/000292#comment-1637493687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Approved&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Porous Vietnam-China Border Permits Massive Animal Smuggling</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000260#comment-997775319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good question, V.K. I reached out to the author and hopefully he will answer you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:45:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Change Comes to Tibet, the Once-pristine Roof of the World</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000250#comment-825861561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said, Joel. This article shows that the right policies can respect environment, economy, and culture all at once.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SXSW PanelPicker</title><link>http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/vote/4534#comment-632165053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an amazing event that leaves interesting digital tire tracks wherever it rides. Can't wait to see it go to the next level, expanding to more cities and regions around the country. I'm sure Climate Ride's social media strategy will play a key role in helping it grow. Bikes and better urbanism are two of the most powerful weapons we have in the fight against global warming.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SXSW PanelPicker</title><link>http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/vote/4176#comment-632160652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love these guys. They make informative, fun short pieces on the most important urban innovations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Source WikiHouse Disrupts Traditional Design</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/innovations/data/000216#comment-621137558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, glad you enjoyed this story. Thanks for spreading word.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Bioregional Politics for an Ecological Civilization</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000241#comment-620276849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael, thanks so much. Part 2 and Part 3 are now published. Enjoy:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000242" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000242"&gt;http://www.policyinnovation...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000243" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000243"&gt;http://www.policyinnovation...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Policy Innovations - The Carnegie Council's online magazine for a fairer globalization.</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/innovations/data/000152#comment-458826223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's talking nonsense about the fake "climategate" scandal from a few years back wherein emails were hacked and stolen from scientists and then distorted in a smear campaign. The whole incident has been debunked by several different investigations. See, for example: &lt;a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/debunking-misinformation-stolen-emails-climategate.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/debunking-misinformation-stolen-emails-climategate.html"&gt;http://www.ucsusa.org/globa...&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200912010002" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mediamatters.org/research/200912010002"&gt;http://mediamatters.org/res...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:35:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The rules for lady bicyclists, 1895 edition: &amp;#8216;Don&amp;#8217;t be a&amp;nbsp;fright&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://grist.org/list/the-rules-for-lady-bicyclists-1895-edition-dont-be-a-fright/#comment-454695139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scratch a match on it, @Jess Zimmerman!!! Great find.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Agricultural Subsidies and Trade: The Key Alternatives</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01402#comment-388019768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds great, Walter. Please go ahead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Climate Change Novel: A Faulty Simulator of Environmental Politics</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000230#comment-359219722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sam, this article is about fiction, not science. If you want science, read the IPCC reports: &lt;a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml"&gt;http://www.ipcc.ch/publicat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ETHICS MATTER: A Conversation with Peter Singer</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/audio/data/000619#comment-338201015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that China has reached its "Kitty Genovese" moment: &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/17/toddler-hit-and-run-china" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/17/toddler-hit-and-run-china"&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/w...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Out Your Electric Bill, Then Get Out and Vote</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000222#comment-322144510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, the text has been emended to reflect this correction. Our apologies. We're happy you're alive!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:43:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUSTAINABILITY FORUM on What Individuals Can Do</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000214#comment-322139585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reader Alan Ecob submitted the following to the Forum:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sustainability and Full-Product Barter&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 1946, Kurnell, the "birthplace of Australia," was a weekender village on the south side of Botany Bay, seven miles from Sydney, our capital city. Through that year, twelve dads, aided by their families—mums and kids all pitching in—but working only on weekends, built twelve cottages to full residential standard. Each family owned their own block of ground and paid for their own materials. It was a team effort. Seven of the men as tradesmen counted their worked hours as standard. The others as helpers worked 1.5 hours to equal a standard hour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was a fun gig. Morale was so high—the atmosphere was so stimulating—that even other kids like me welcomed being roped in to assist as occasion required, such as carrying building materials to site from off the punt that brought them across the bay. The scheme was an example of full-product barter. The need for money had been minimal. Cottage completion was attained for only a quarter of comparable market prices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite the enthusiasm and benefits, such schemes were seen by authority to be seriously illegal. When in 1961, in the midst of a severe recession, I naively made a submission to our ATO (Australian Tax Office) proposing to organize out-of-hours full-product barter among consenting tradesmen, a no-name voice on the phone told me that if I did, they would impute $ values to everything, impose $ penalties on all concerned that I would find hard to believe, and pursue us through every court in the land—if necessary, "to the ends of the Earth"—to exact payment.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What connection may be made between sustainability and nationally organized full-product barter? The starting point could be the 20 percent of our federal government's budget now being spent because of unemployment, idle manufacturing capacity, and widespread social need. If this level of government expenditure and application of resources could be halved, as it could so easily be if full-product barter were made freely allowable, even if only on weekends, then the savings could be directly applied to sustainable environmental objectives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In response to the posed question—What can a person do?—my suggestion is: Become aware of all the options, including the freeing of full-product barter, perhaps under the banner of Saturdays Tax-Free for the Workers, and act, agitate, and vote accordingly.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;© Alan Ecob FCPA  M.Phil.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUSTAINABILITY FORUM: What are the Limitations and Benefits of the Sustainability Approach?</title><link>http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/0103.html#comment-304418485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A slightly longer meditation on this question can be found in Peter Marcuse's 1998 essay "Sustainability is not enough" (Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 10, No. 2) wherein he reformulates the Brundtland definition of sustainability: "Sustainable development is development that meets specific needs of the present, and can be maintained into the future, without detracting from the satisfaction of other needs in the present or future." His view is that sustainability should be considered a constraint, not a goal in itself: "If ... sustainability is a constraint rather than a goal, then it can be used as a criterion to evaluate measures that achieve otherwise defined desirable goals; a desirable measure that is not sustainable is not as good as an equally desirable measure that is." Those desirable goals being ones that are socially just. For more: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://eau.sagepub.com/content/10/2/103.full.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://eau.sagepub.com/content/10/2/103.full.pdf"&gt;http://eau.sagepub.com/cont...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Policy Innovations - The Carnegie Council's online magazine for a fairer globalization.</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01512#comment-294421199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bronwen, I'm not sure which questionnaire you mean. I would try contacting nef directly or searching their site for your needs: &lt;a href="http://www.neweconomics.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.neweconomics.org/"&gt;http://www.neweconomics.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Carbon Capture and Utilization</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01612#comment-288176352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points. Craig Venter is playing the algae game as well: &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/is-craig-venter-going-to-save-the-planet-or-is-this-more-hype-from-one-of-americas-most-controversial-scientists/2011/06/07/gIQAfr2c8I_story.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/is-craig-venter-going-to-save-the-planet-or-is-this-more-hype-from-one-of-americas-most-controversial-scientists/2011/06/07/gIQAfr2c8I_story.html"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Policy Innovations - The Carnegie Council's online magazine for a fairer globalization.</title><link>http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/commentary/data/000171#comment-263568668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sour Strawberries, Thanks for sharing these links with us. As you may have noticed, the author is a government official offering a unique internal perspective, and it should be read as such.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">policyinnovations</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>