<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for plawler</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/plawler/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/plawler/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 20:17:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The U.S. Occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom</title><link>https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/us-occupation-hawaiian-kingdom#comment-6105984887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Liechtenstein, tomorrow the world! (j/k)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 20:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cops Suspect Murder Suicide in Pharma Billionaire &amp;#038; Wife&amp;#8217;s Death, Family Says No Way</title><link>https://www.healthnutnews.com/cops-suspect-murder-suicide-in-pharma-billionaire-wifes-death-family-says-no-way/#comment-3668116373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He was one of the biggest drug manufacturers in the world, and he was constantly battling with big Pharma. So he was constantly battling with himself?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:18:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3434082448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I repeated (and clarified) my words four times, I'm going with not trying to hide from them. But thanks for playing. I understand there are some lovely parting gifts for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 02:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3433503485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly I do not have the intellectual capacity (or insult vocabulary) to engage in "Tit-forTat." Therefore I leave you to your echo chamber. Peace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3433499492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They "have lived" (present perfect) without Judaism/Christianity for centuries. I invoked this tense to show that their present situation  in which they ARE NOT murdering each other in the streets on a daily basis (at least no more than Western countries) is not a result of their having embraced Judaism/Christianity over the past centuries, in fact, just opposite.&lt;br&gt;You are trying to take what happened in the past and convince us that that is their present condition. Again, this is like looking at how the United States treated native Americans and trying to tell us how genocidal we are as a country today. I'm sorry, but I can't buy either argument.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3427796970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Say what? Dodge responsibility for saying it? I just repeated it. Here, I'll say it again for you. "They aren't (present tense) murdering each other on the streets on a daily basis (at least no more than Western countries)." Apparently you consider basic English grammar to be "leftist word-parsing." Sorry, but it sucks to be you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 22:40:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3423572813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So there is nothing then, that would prove to you that Christianity is false. Is that correct?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 20:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3423120087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry. I thought you were saying Hitler was an atheist. My mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He Fights - Evan Sayet</title><link>https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580#comment-3423118445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, but you have no evidence that those atrocities were motivated by their atheism. Japan was certainly not. As we see with Hitler and the Crusades, one can be a theist and still be a cruel dictator or commit atrocities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Premium Vodka's Taste Live Up to Its Price Tag?</title><link>http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=3201973#comment-2860149258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is the video?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:36:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pokémon GO updated to v0.33 with Poké Ball XP fix, new driving warning, and more (but still no tracking) [APK Download] [Update]</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2016/08/08/pokemon-go-updated-v0-33-poke-ball-xp-fix-new-driving-warning-still-no-tracking/#comment-2827587585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you should have!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Gun Nuts Lie &amp;#8211; I Know From Experience</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dogmadebate/2016/06/why-gun-nuts-lie-i-know-from-experience/#comment-2757842243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn, you're right. We're better than Syria. Well I guess that ends the discussion doesn't it. Or would you perhaps like to compare the U.S. gun homicide rate against other 1st world countries? (didn't think so)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Gun Nuts Lie &amp;#8211; I Know From Experience</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dogmadebate/2016/06/why-gun-nuts-lie-i-know-from-experience/#comment-2757836343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the colonists didn't beat the regulars on a level playing field, but they did have virtually the exact same weaponry. That is no longer the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:33:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama’s home state introduces ‘GROUNDBREAKING’ gun bill&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/democrats-take-major-step-toward-universal-gun-registry#comment-2745796384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And when they come for you exercise those 2nd Amendment remedies, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama’s home state introduces ‘GROUNDBREAKING’ gun bill&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/democrats-take-major-step-toward-universal-gun-registry#comment-2745795670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, he proposed SO much anti-gun legislation, and issued SO many executive orders trying to take our guns away! Oh, wait....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2740000300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How very disingenuous of you. Yes, the organization is still going strong. Advocacy of eugenics is not. And yes, of course the government has a right to impinge on your freedom if it means a better collective outcome. Your "natural rights" are not absolute. That's how the social contract works. You know...things like traffic laws. You might be a fabulous driver, but you still have to give up the freedom to drive as fast as you know you are able to safely for the good of society. You give up the freedom to yell, "Fire!" in a crowded theater for the good of society. Are those the worst criticisms you have of progressives? Don't you want to lambaste Teddy Roosevelt? Sheesh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:28:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2738210534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, so if he said he was a "right wing reactionary" would that be more palatable to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 18:38:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2738091101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This may come as a real shock to you but most progressives are trying to make changes to values, rather than preserving values.  But your response points out a larger problem. The attitude that we are good wholesome western civilization, and followers of Islam are barbarians. You may have noticed that even though it's clearly written in the Bible, Jews and Christians (for the most part) no longer stone adulterers or sabbath breakers, or homosexuals, and no longer keep slaves (although that's much more recent in the United States). Does Islam have to evolve, like Judaism and Christianity did? Sure. But branding them barbarians is not going to help that process. &lt;br&gt;Does ISIS/ISIL/daesh employ barbaric tactics? Yes. Do they do so in the name of Islam and supported by Islamic scripture? Yes. So what is the best way to deal with them? Posturing (as Mr. Cruz and Mr. Trump have done) about turning their deserts into glass certainly does not endear us to the larger Islamic community. Clearly human beings are capable of evolving socially (as we see with Jews and Christians). So it would appear to be a question of education and acceptable re-interpretation of their sacred texts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:50:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2737381490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except nobody said radical Muslims were "classical liberals" (except in your fevered imagination). He said radical Muslims were conservatives. And they are. Just because you and I don't agree with the values they want to conserve doesn't mean they are not conservatives in the society in which they live.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 05:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2735679063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but when someone says extremist Muslims are conservative, they do not mean that they are "classical liberals." They mean that they are persons who are averse to change and hold to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics. In this case traditional from about the 9th century. You can't get much more conservative than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2735175235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So far, I haven't found a dictionary that has your definition for the original meaning. Unless you are Shakespeare, if you make up definitions for words, don't expect other people to use them according to your definition instead of the generally accepted ones.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2731699550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try opening a dictionary. Is the dictionary definition closer to yours or to mine. QED&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 03:20:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When You Hear Someone Call an AR-15 an Assault Rifle, Show Them This</title><link>http://tribunist.com/news/when-you-hear-someone-call-an-ar-15-an-assault-rifle-show-them-this/#comment-2731195669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, John. You are the one with the skewed definition. As with the word "gay," your "classical" definition doesn't fit modern usage. Try using a dictionary definition. People tend to agree on those more. Here. I'll help you out.&lt;br&gt; Conservative n. a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unemployed? Hawaii wants you to move there so it can give you a job.</title><link>https://matadornetwork.com/network/unemployed-hawaii-wants-move-can-give-job/#comment-2643263625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, you read it somewhere. But that doesn't make it true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it a Bald-Faced or Bold-Faced Lie?</title><link>http://mentalfloss.com/article/57985/it-bald-faced-or-bold-faced-lie#comment-2386085129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell the truth at all times? I dare you to tell the truth when faced with a question like, "Does this dress make me look fat?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plawler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:41:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>