<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pjdoland</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/pjdoland/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/pjdoland/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:14:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: In Defense Of Tracy Morgan - Ta-Nehisi Coates - Entertainment - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/06/in-defense-of-tracy-morgan/240632/#comment-228457936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mickey Rooney is not dead (yet). Can you please change "was" to "is."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:14:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitcoin: Imagine a net without intermediaries</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2011/04/16/bitcoin-imagine-a-net-without-intermediaries/#comment-188262761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As elegant as the implementation might be, is there a single advantage that Bitcoin has over online credit card payments for Joe Consumer, if you assume that Joe Consumer is not either paranoid or engaged in something shady or illegal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Digital currencies have never really caught on not because they relied on a central authority, but rather because everybody already had credit cards which limited their personal fraud liability to $50.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m going to Disney World</title><link>http://sometimesright.com/2010/06/im-going-to-disney-world/#comment-55147628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You'll enjoy it much more if you're fully immersed (and not seeing everything around you as American cultural signifiers).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:40:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m going to Disney World</title><link>http://sometimesright.com/2010/06/im-going-to-disney-world/#comment-55141740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really hope you don't "report back here" until you return from your trip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're updating a blog from WDW, then you're doing it wrong. And don't forget to visit the Monster's Inc. Laugh Floor in Tomorrowland and ride Toy Story Midway Mania at Disney Hollywood Studios.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should We Allow Internet in Cars?</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2010/01/07/should-we-allow-internet-in-cars/#comment-29975993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In general, I would probably tend to favor restrictions on non-navigational or non-instrumental display devices being within view of the driver.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robotic Prostitution, Parental Controls, Caprica &amp;#038; Sex in the Uncanny Valley</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2010/01/11/robotic-prostitution-parental-controls-caprica-sex-in-the-uncanny-valley/#comment-29422294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of states already have bans on the sale of sex toys.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should We Allow Internet in Cars?</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2010/01/07/should-we-allow-internet-in-cars/#comment-28894985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I, for one, actually love the idea that the guy in the left lane on 66 might be in the middle of conducting a World of Warcraft raid with his guild buddies while he's changing into my lane at 70 MPH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Isn't technology great?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks, Amazon, for rewarding early adopters with... - Jerry Brito</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/257669264#comment-24111903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's entirely possible the first generation hardware just isn't up to the task.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - This is a complete and utter embarrassment....</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/247513837#comment-23381573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually really like this photo (probably for obvious reasons).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:15:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ugliness of Privacy Notices</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/11/04/the-ugliness-of-privacy-notices/#comment-21881711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We could always treat privacy notices like favicon files or robots.txt files. Have them stay in a standard place, but let the user-agent negotiate their download and use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:07:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Source is Not the Enemy</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2009/11/03/2009-open-source-cms-report-by-water-stone/#comment-21812332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We actually develop sites for clients using both open source content management systems and custom proprietary systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Systems like Drupal, Joomla, and WordPress are good options when a client needs something that doesn't conflict with the basic assumptions made by the software's development community (who are catering to a general user base). If a client is willing to stay within the lines, then they can usually get 95% of what they want or need for 40% of the comparative cost. This is the preferred way of doing things whenever it will help realize the basic objectives of the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes, however, clients have a very particular way they need things maintained. It could be because of a need to manage a large number of idiosyncratic data-relationships. It could be the result of a very specialized internal workflow. Sometimes it's just bullheadedness on the part of an executive decisionmaker. In these situations, it's often better to go the custom route. Trying to use an open source CMS when it's not appropriate can be not only very messy, but much more expensive to maintain than a well-built custom solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To make sure you don't get burned, find a vendor who is both familiar with open source systems and able to identify when they are and are not appropriate. To put it another way: vendors who only work with open source content management systems tend to see every problem as a nail; vendors who never use them tend to see you as an easy mark.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - What I did today.</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/203603399#comment-18440524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Lord. Microsoft should buy that and run it as an anti-iMac spot during primetime.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - snyderp:

Just noticed that the replacement...</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/184716913#comment-16360393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You sure that's not supposed to be a "gremlin"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - The Connecticut legislature hard at work. (via...</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/178199128#comment-15807141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you expect for $28k a year?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Must Fear the Cookie Monster!</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/21/you-must-fear-the-cookie-monster/#comment-15204557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On a sidenote, there are quite a few sketchy things government websites could do quite easily by using cookies and IP address logging, and it's not unreasonable to be concerned about the possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just off the top of my head... The IRS could trigger automatic tax audits for taxpayers who may have visited specific pages on an IRS website before filing a return electronically (i.e. anybody who may have reviewed penalties or fines for making fraudulent deductions in advance of filing probably deserves a "closer look").&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Must Fear the Cookie Monster!</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/21/you-must-fear-the-cookie-monster/#comment-15204227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll admit that cookies are a bit of a red herring, as IP logging presents many of the same issues. I'll also concede that this Siciliano character doesn't seem to know what he's talking about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To be clear, I'm not worried about Google collecting and aggregating user information to enhance their targeted advertising offerings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I am terrified that the information Google collects will serve as a one-stop shopping center for our three-letter agencies monitoring private communications at home and abroad. It's just too tempting for the intelligence community when they know how much information Google is already gathering in one place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Must Fear the Cookie Monster!</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/21/you-must-fear-the-cookie-monster/#comment-15197041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course the U.S. government and the Obama Administration are in league with Google to gather our private information. Do you really think Google hasn't received National Security Letters forcing them to comply with any and all requests made by the NSA for the integration of surveillance systems?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Copyright Duration and the Mickey Mouse Curve</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2009/08/06/copyright-duration-and-the-mickey-mouse-curve/#comment-14392278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't any derivative works necessarily violate Disney's trademark (NOT COPYRIGHT) on the Mickey Mouse character, which they also hold, and have defended appropriately, for the last 81 years?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:33:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Copyright Duration and the Mickey Mouse Curve</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2009/08/06/copyright-duration-and-the-mickey-mouse-curve/#comment-14353266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does this really mean, given the fact that Mickey Mouse is also registered as a trademark?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aren't we really just talking about the copyright status of a few specific animated shorts of limited commercial value ("Mickey Mouse in Plane Crazy," "The Gallopin' Gaucho," and "Steamboat Willie") and not the iconic characters themselves?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - Great Moments In Marketing: Disney Pulls Movie Trailer Off YouTube For Copyright Claims | Techdirt</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/148237358#comment-13274084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Call me cynical, but maybe they were counting on the Streisand Effect to drive buzz for the trailer?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarian Ideal Theory as Silent Complicity</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/04/10/libertarian-ideal-theory-as-silent-complicity/#comment-8056753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where, exactly, do you decide when it's OK to compromise the ideal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may seem perfectly reasonable to say:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Well, **IF** we're going to have state-sponsored marriage, we should allow same-sex marriage."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But what about the following&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Well, **IF** we're going to be torturing detainees without a trial, it should JUST be water-boarding."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Well, **IF** we're going to be throwing non-violent drug offenders in jail, it should JUST be crack users."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - I have never been a dog person, but this is the...</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/74205189#comment-5693299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That dog wouldn't be nearly as cute if he wasn't sitting on a Saarinen Womb chair.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Do Not Need to be IM Pei to Impress Me</title><link>http://brittany.tumblr.com/post/73836973#comment-5628035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have any idea how little an architect makes? Or how boring 99% of what they do actually is?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Nightmare To Be Delayed</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2009/01/27/national-nightmare-to-be-delayed/#comment-5603216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you don't have a digital receiver by now, you probably shouldn't be watching television in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - Georgetown A.N.C. won't let Apple build store</title><link>http://jerrybrito.org/post/73238535#comment-5551263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. That was really stupid of Apple to think they could just buy a storefront in Georgetown and build something there without running into ANC/zoning problems. That should have been pretty damn obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PJ Doland</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>