<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pius</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/pius/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/pius/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:12:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The End.</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2012/07/the-end/#comment-604770828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a ride it's been, ladies. Truly the end of an era.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As someone who's had the privilege to see you add an extra bit of laughter and light to the lives of so many women (and those of us men lucky enough to be spotted by Christie and Jess), I must admit to a bit of mist in my eyes reading this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for everything! See you at the reunion party, on my yacht or yours. No tan jackets allowed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:12:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Couch of Christie: Fall and Love (or the Secret of Thanksgiving)</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/?p=7761#comment-370158882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great piece, very sweet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hiring via API</title><link>http://www.mattbrezina.com/blog/2011/08/hiring-via-api/#comment-294571717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree completely Matt ... now let me into the Ship private beta! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coffee House Talks: If this past week has taught us anything, it's that the GOP has entrenched itself as the party of hate</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/12/if-this-past-week-has-taught-us.html#comment-111055882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I literally couldn't agree more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ask Jess: There Is No Reason That You&amp;#8217;re Single</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2010/09/ask-jess-there-is-no-reason-that-youre-single/#comment-76061417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, Jess!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BP stanches the gushing of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, begins pressure testing</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/07/bp-stanches-gushing-of-oil-into-gulf-of.html#comment-62561245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"In all seriousness, this process has been very poorly handled by BP, and the part where they come out of as heroes for fixing their own disaster is infuriating."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree.  I do think, though, that BP's liability in this matter will be inescapable under this administration.  We'll see.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Senor:  Did David Visit PLHD or Not?  Yep, I&amp;#8217;ve got an update!</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2010/07/the-senor-did-david-visit-plhd-or-not-yep-ive-got-an-update/#comment-62376615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's epic, I'm glad it all worked out.  BTW, I liked the mention of the rational actor model ... always good to let your nerd flag fly every now and again. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ask Jess: Orianthi Shows Us Why You Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Juggle Multiple Men</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2010/07/ask-jess-orianthi-shows-us-why-you-shouldnt-juggle-multiple-men/#comment-61100338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my experience, the key is being willing to walk away and asking her to make a choice when the time is right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the girl's sincerely interested, she'll pick you.  If not, either she's too messed up over the old thing to move on or, well, she's just not that into you.  Either way you've got your answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:01:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 5 Things You Should Never Say on a First Date</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2010/07/top-5-things-you-should-never-say-on-a-first-date/#comment-61099578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"This is definitely just a cold sore. Not herpes. I think."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LMAO, so much fail there, I don't know where to begin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DatingGirl: When Traveling Together Goes Wrong</title><link>http://citygirlsworld.com/cgw/blog/2010/07/datinggirl-when-traveling-together-goes-wrong/#comment-61099384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you learn a LOT about someone when you travel.  It's like an amplifier: red flags that may have been too subtle to see before loom large, while great qualities that you may have taken for granted come out in spades.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:52:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Week in Arizona Racism...</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/this-week-in-arizona-racism.html#comment-57266261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25% of BP's market cap disappears in 4 days of trading</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/25-of-bps-market-cap-disappears-in-4.html#comment-55583294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point.  They actually only have $12 billion liquid.  And they want to give $10 billion of that away as dividends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:12:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25% of BP's market cap disappears in 4 days of trading</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/25-of-bps-market-cap-disappears-in-4.html#comment-55576872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eh ... 100 billion dollars will buy a lot of clean up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FiveThirtyEight gets acquired by the New York Times</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/fivethirtyeight-gets-acquired-by-new.html#comment-54897623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  Plus, I think the NYT is increasingly pursuing a more data-driven approach, so it seems like a great fit to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Nuremberg Defense of Racist Slurs</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/nuremberg-defense-of-racist-slurs.html#comment-54651972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant comparison.  Hard to believe anyone would buy this excuse here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The CEO of BP "wants [his] life back."</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/ceo-of-bp-wants-his-life-back.html#comment-54117268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just updated the post to reflect that, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:19:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Supreme Court's New Miranda Rules - Maybe Not &lt;i&gt;So&lt;/i&gt; Bad</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/06/supreme-courts-new-miranda-rules-maybe.html#comment-53461866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thoughtful analysis, makes sense to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Comment System</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/new-comment-system.html#comment-52710914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;trying to syndicate to Facebook again ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:42:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Comment System</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/new-comment-system.html#comment-52702000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you think so far?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tar balls found off Key West, FL suspected to be from BP Oil Disaster</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/tar-balls-found-off-key-west-fl.html#comment-52411954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was a great read, thanks!  I'm going to link it up a little later.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 11:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why does the Semantic Web feel so over-engineered?</title><link>http://blog.georgikobilarov.com/2010/05/why-does-the-semantic-web-feel-so-over-engineered/#comment-52351151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"adding more stuff is always easy, so RDF doesn't have a killer feature here."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The killer feature is that the properties you add can actually have meaning because they can be related to existing ones.  For instance, if you add a field called "lname" to your database, that doesn't have any intrinsic meaning to any system in the real world except perhaps your own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With RDF, on the other hand, you can say lname owl:equivalentProperty foaf:lastName.  Suddenly systems that know what foaf:lastName is actually know what "lname" is.  I'd call that a killer feature. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why does the Semantic Web feel so over-engineered?</title><link>http://blog.georgikobilarov.com/2010/05/why-does-the-semantic-web-feel-so-over-engineered/#comment-52350304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"how about if we make things simple now, and add complexity later if we see we need the complexity?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, but what competent ontologist actually disagrees with this?  As a matter of fact, this is the best practice for developing an ontology.  You're supposed to start with an existing ontology that is a "decent fit" for your use case and then only specify new properties and classes as you need them.  Even when you specify new properties and classes, you're supposed to anchor them to those of existing ontologies.  How is this over-engineered?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tar balls found off Key West, FL suspected to be from BP Oil Disaster</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/tar-balls-found-off-key-west-fl.html#comment-51230187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, I'll look that up and update the post.  Strangely enough, I just heard today that the oil has been confirmed to have hit the Loop Current.  So I'll need to investigate and make sense of what's going on ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:28:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joe Sestak defeats Arlen Specter in PA Democratic Senate Primary</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/joe-sestak-defeats-arlen-specter-in-pa.html#comment-51050373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Plus there were local factors.  Specter's campaign very much felt like big city machine politics out of Philadelphia and Washington, whereas Sestak's campaign felt a lot more like that of a traditional PA grassroots Democrat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subsequently, Sestak destroyed Specter in Allegheny County, Lawrence County, and pretty much all of Western Pennsylvania (where I'm from).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Obama saw the handwriting on the wall and wisely stayed out of it near the end.  He was in Youngstown, OH yesterday (just a few miles from Western PA), yet he specifically did not stump at all for Specter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joe Sestak defeats Arlen Specter in PA Democratic Senate Primary</title><link>http://www.coffeehousetalks.com/2010/05/joe-sestak-defeats-arlen-specter-in-pa.html#comment-50992753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there are too many confounding variables to tell much of anything for sure. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, Arlen was unbelievably brazen in how he described his party switch when he made it.  At the time, I specifically thought "He's gonna get wrecked with this in the primary."  Sure enough, he did.  He had the lead until this ad came out with that footage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>