Disqus - Latest Comments for peterey

Re: Chart of $SPX

peterey — Wed, 27 May 2009 03:29:11 -0000

thanks for sharing ... life is a challenge for everyone of us... all the best

Re: Mission Impossible

peterey — Sun, 10 May 2009 06:40:08 -0000

thanks,

if you mean different possible outcomes, I agree, I realize that it is never safe nor intelligent to see only one side of it... I should have stated clearly that I do not consider it a prediction but just one scenario that fits the proportions currently evidenced by the chart

... if you meant considering various elements of one's analysis to complement the view, this is what I tried to evidence in the chart: Fibs, fractals, trendlines and weekly overbought conditions all aligning at the moment...

but as I said, the market does what it wants and we can only see new proportions in hindsight

Re: Mission Impossible

peterey — Sat, 09 May 2009 13:50:14 -0000

Just some proportions on SPX...
... then the market does what it wants and new proportions are discovered

http://www.screencast.com/t...

interested in your opinion...

Re: Fractal? History often rhymes

peterey — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:56:32 -0000

Lawrence,

I just posted my chart with some proportions/fractals/Fibs on SPX and then read your post on fractals and I find it very similar to my observations... very compelling indeed

great work

Re: Fractal? History often rhymes

peterey — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:50:38 -0000

Just some proportions on SPX...
... then the market does what it wants and new proportions are discovered

http://www.screencast.com/t...

Re: Freaky Friday Rub Down

peterey — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:49:06 -0000

Just some proportions on SPX...
... then the market does what it wants and new proportions are discovered

http://www.screencast.com/t...

Re: http://slopeofhope.com/2009/05/09/max_pain.htm

peterey — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:48:32 -0000

Just some proportions on SPX...
... then the market does what it wants and new proportions are discovered

http://www.screencast.com/t...

Re: S&P Equal Weighted Index

peterey — Fri, 01 May 2009 06:42:40 -0000

Thank you.

Re: S&P Equal Weighted Index

peterey — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:46:49 -0000

Can I ask you why you used the Equal Weighted S&P index?

Thanks,

Re: Graphical: Solutide Model

peterey — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:33:59 -0000

may i then ask you what do you base your expectations on? i thought / understood statistics was part of your method...

Re: Graphical: Solutide Model

peterey — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:12:31 -0000

if SPX closes above 869.6 for the week it would be the 7th up week in a row.

that would be very overbought (statistically speaking), while if it closes just below last week's close (ie 869.6), that would re-set the situation and a new weekly up trend won't be statistically extreme.

for this reason, for a bearish scenario I would be happier to see a SPX close >869.6.

Any thoughts on this?

Re: http://lcmarket.blogspot.com/2009/04/turn-dates.html

peterey — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:03:28 -0000

KS, where can I email you regarding the london apprenticeship you mentioned few days ago?

Re: Getting Close

peterey — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:37:01 -0000

thanks, nice clear view

Re: Tuesday Wrap Up

peterey — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:24:11 -0000

nice charts asetrader, keep posting.

do i need a subscription / fee to use stockcharts.com form my studies?

thanks

Re: trying again

peterey — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:17:48 -0000

thanks again

Re: trying again

peterey — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:03:17 -0000

arak0,

Thanks for the 3-3:10 warning, very timely.

what's the index PC?

Re: US to delay bank test results for earnings-source

peterey — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:56:36 -0000

Thanks.

Correct me if you see it differently, but after reading the paper quickly this morning I see that these dates not specifically apply to the stock market.

In fact, for example, on page 27 he clarifies that "the SP500 exceeded the Feb.2007 high".

It is a very compelling analysis, but I wonder if it can be used as a short term (days/2-3 weeks), trading tool?

Re: tested 850

peterey — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:15:48 -0000

2cool,

Are you saying that rather than a bullish signal the 20-50 cross, happened to be a reverse signal?

Re: Thursday Wrap Up

peterey — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:59:36 -0000

Fishrman,

Thanks, it looks interesting.

Are you saying that the table shows that there is distribution rather than accumulation of financial stocks, while they are rising?

How can financials experience such a rise if the intent of the majority is to get rid of the shares rather than accumulate them? is it maybe that the big players are selling why the retail are buying?...but I do not read that from the table.

I would appreciate if you could let me understand how to read this piece of info.

Thanks.

Re: US to delay bank test results for earnings-source

peterey — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:19:27 -0000

Arako,

Why do you say that Armstrong suggests either April 16th or April 19th, when the front page says "2009.3 (March 19 2009)?

Re: Precious times

peterey — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:18:23 -0000

Attila,

Please correct me if am wrong, but VIX was not flat yesterday, I see it was down 5.57% at 39.7.

Re: The Ugly Truth

peterey — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:04:18 -0000

Squidman,

It looks to me as if they are playing the upper 75% of a channel in ES today (please see my screencast: http://www.screencast.com/t...

Can you show me the channel you are referring to?

Thanks.

Re: The Ugly Truth

peterey — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:59:24 -0000

Thanks Steve, appreciated.

Re: The Ugly Truth

peterey — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:56:32 -0000

Indus and ObamaGirl,

Can you tell me what is that you see as the reason for the bounce at 822?

Thanks

Re: Quarterly Wrap Up

peterey — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:58:30 -0000

is bearish view (confirmed by today's closes), consistent with Mole's count and (if I am not mistaking), current bullish bias?