<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for petercooper</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/petercooper/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/petercooper/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:12:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 55781 https://www.campaignmonitor.com/?p=55781</title><link>https://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/email-marketing/2020/07/basecamps-hey-what-you-need-to-know/#comment-4982925488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://m.signalvnoise.com/mailing-list-software-should-stop-spying-on-subscribers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://m.signalvnoise.com/mailing-list-software-should-stop-spying-on-subscribers/"&gt;https://m.signalvnoise.com/...&lt;/a&gt; has a reference to the idea of click tracking not being as bad (although still not ideal).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Jonathan says below, DHH has also said some things in tweets about the different privacy expectations around clicks vs opens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From a practical perspective, we've removed open rate tracking on our emails to &lt;a href="http://hey.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="hey.com"&gt;hey.com&lt;/a&gt; (we use open tracking to delete inactive subs, as Gmail suggests is a best practice, but if &lt;a href="http://Hey.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Hey.com"&gt;Hey.com&lt;/a&gt; doesn't care, we don't need to track those) but left click tracking and no "spy" warnings appear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 55781 https://www.campaignmonitor.com/?p=55781</title><link>https://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/email-marketing/2020/07/basecamps-hey-what-you-need-to-know/#comment-4982624625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can still track clicks on things, they've explicitly said they're fine with this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PostgresWeekly Interview – Luca Ferrari – Open Source advocate, human being</title><link>https://fluca1978.github.io/2020/04/24/PostgresWeeklyInterview.html#comment-4893289808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Luca, it was very kind of you to do the interview with us :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:18:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deploy CodeSandbox to Netlify | Netlify</title><link>https://www.netlify.com/blog/2019/03/26/deploy-codesandbox-to-netlify/#comment-4397424420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! BTW, in that list of ways to deploy, are you missing deploying via GitHub? Or is that considered something else given the build process involved?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decoding Rails Magic: How Does ActiveJob work? - Karol Galanciak - Ruby on Rails and Ember.js consultant</title><link>http://karolgalanciak.com/blog/2016/09/25/decoding-rails-magic-how-does-activejob-work/#comment-2924582932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are some HTML entity rendering issues in your final code sample, BTW :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:56:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Given the choice, 75 percent of Mail Online readers opt for desktop homepage on mobile - Digiday</title><link>http://digiday.com/?p=142725#comment-2328004474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's because they're doing it badly and not giving the option of a mobile page with /everything/. I read the Daily Mail site each day on mobile and use the "classic" page because I don't want to read "News" OR "Showbiz". I want both! If they did a mobile friendly page which had everything like the classic page, I'd pick that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:20:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who’s the least sartorially challenged on campus this week?</title><link>http://thetab.com/uk/tab/2015/03/03/whos-least-sartorially-challenged-campus-week/#comment-1898036619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hands up if you just voted for the one you found most attractive&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is why I can’t have conversations using Twitter - Antirez weblog</title><link>http://antirez.com/news/82#comment-1658928099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely. Twitter is a useless medium for having any sort of nuanced, conversational interaction. You're guaranteed to eventually fall into a misunderstanding with someone that can't be addressed without posting 10 tweets in a row and looking crazy. It certainly works much better as a broadcast medium and for giving occasional shout-outs, high fives, and anything you know isn't going to go beyond a short, positive interaction (i.e. not discussions, refutations, arguments, corrections, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I took a month off of Twitter after a very prominent Twitter user retweeted a sarcastic observation I made to his half a million followers without any context.. for which I got a whole ton of shit from busybodies. After I returned, I basically vowed to keep things clean and unambiguous, to focus on using Twitter to achieve my aims, and to just block anyone I'm not interested in seeing immediately. It has worked quite well so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drunk Pirate: Development Log #1</title><link>https://greyzoned.com/drunk-pirate-development-log-1/#comment-1618384148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't got a lot to say but looks interesting and I think my daughter might find it enjoyable, even if he is drunk! ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with interators and generators in ECMAScript 6</title><link>http://macr.ae/article/iterators-and-generators.html#comment-1245587383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I respect helping authors in being more accurate and think you should keep on doing it by contacting them, posting in comments, etc. as I know you have been. This is a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With regards to naming and shaming only us on Twitter, despite such articles being shared by numerous other community sites and JavaScript developers first, that I take personally. I'm going to e-mail you about this, though, because no-one else here cares. However, this is a two-sided story (undoubtedly with error on both sides) and has greater context outside of this thread, so I apologise to Callum for taking a verbal dump on your comments ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with interators and generators in ECMAScript 6</title><link>http://macr.ae/article/iterators-and-generators.html#comment-1244771975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarifications. Yeah, I'm tired of sabre rattlers having a go at us, when 101 smarter folks than us tweeted and linked something first, but it's even more depressing that people could get put off of putting out interesting content just because it might contain errors. I'd much rather a wide variety of people write and engage with stuff and "break a few eggs" along the way, than only have a bunch of old white standards-body dudes have the authoritative say - any day of the week! :-) Keep up the good work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Playing with interators and generators in ECMAScript 6</title><link>http://macr.ae/article/iterators-and-generators.html#comment-1244629498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rick Waldron has been having a go at us at JavaScript Weekly for linking to this post because he says it's "incorrect": &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/rwaldron/status/434414240124788736" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/rwaldron/status/434414240124788736"&gt;https://twitter.com/rwaldro...&lt;/a&gt; .. Could you respond to him and/or fix his concerns because he's trying to make both of us look bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Went From An Idea To Paying Customers In 3 Days</title><link>https://doubleyourfreelancing.com/idea-to-customers-in-3-days/#comment-1220788125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If anything tells me HN has gone down the pan, it's that this post didn't take off there. This is gold!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:44:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publishers to Ezra Klein: Good Luck! You'll Need it!</title><link>http://digiday.com/?p=61784#comment-1213414002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"his site would only be generating $80,000 per month"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh no, how could a small sustainable business ever survive on that!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sarcasm aside, the majority of perfectly sustainable small businesses (even in media) do just fine on less than this, including many of the most popular but smaller staffed (or even just a single person) blogs out there. It's his call if he wants to turn it into a huge business with "three dozen staffers" or whatever it is, but it's not absolutely necessary to run so rich at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:24:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evening Edition looks to build beyond its simple model</title><link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/07/evening-edition-looks-to-build-beyond-its-simple-model/#comment-1206322428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You predicted correctly. Evening Edition appears to have shut down, as has The Brief. Proof, if any were needed, that media - money == no media.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:51:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Client-side full-text search in CSS</title><link>http://www.redotheweb.com/2013/05/15/client-side-full-text-search-in-css.html#comment-1038585738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, couldn't you dynamically generate the data-index attributes on page load using JavaScript? That way there'd be no repetition and only a single run through with JavaScript (rather than on every search).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Makes Stuff — First Law: Test Builds</title><link>http://rjevans.net/firstlaw#comment-1018295545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My 3 year old daughter loves it. I haven't put her in front of First Law yet as I have to fix the controls, but she loves Riftoon and spends most of her time laughing and punching stuff in mid air.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A List of Programming Screencast Series</title><link>http://devblog.avdi.org/2013/06/21/a-list-of-programming-screencast-series/#comment-937690594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being serious though, I think you should add them. I'm not aware of another list like this and it could be very useful, so it makes sense to have it on there even though this is your site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing RubyAudit for Gem Vulnerability Detection</title><link>http://blog.craz8.com/articles/2013/5/27/ruby-audit-for-gem-vulnerability-detection#comment-920366506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, hit me up when you launch or otherwise have more to show. It's the sort of thing I could include in Ruby Weekly but it's a bit early ATM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing RubyAudit for Gem Vulnerability Detection</title><link>http://blog.craz8.com/articles/2013/5/27/ruby-audit-for-gem-vulnerability-detection#comment-920345031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your main link to RubyAudit at the end of the post is busted because there's no http..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:03:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top North American Conferences for Entrepreneurs</title><link>http://blog.clarity.fm/top-north-american-conferences-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-812919884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;O'Reilly Fluent - &lt;a href="http://fluentconf.com/fluent2013" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fluentconf.com/fluent2013"&gt;http://fluentconf.com/fluen...&lt;/a&gt; - JavaScript, HTML5 and Web browser conference from O'Reilly. We also do a Startup Showcase which enables startups to show off their products to the audience (900 last year) for free with the voted winner getting keynote stage exposure on the last day of the conference :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: Jony Ive talks Design and Blue Peter</title><link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2013/02/18/video-jony-ive-talks-design-and-blue-peter/#comment-804285138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He used to be a lot more.. "filled out" back in the day! :) &lt;a href="http://modmyi.com/attachments/forums/mac-news/615020-jony-ive-reportedly-tinkering-major-ios-design-changes-johnny_young_old.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://modmyi.com/attachments/forums/mac-news/615020-jony-ive-reportedly-tinkering-major-ios-design-changes-johnny_young_old.jpg"&gt;http://modmyi.com/attachmen...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:01:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Guy's Car Got Stuck at 125mph -- for an Hour</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/02/this-guys-car-got-stuck-at-125mph-for-an-hour/273140/#comment-798964471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Notably, this principle is also at work in the United Kingdom - especially in the tube - despite ordinarily driving on the opposite side of the road.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Functional Eye for the Ruby Guy - The Hashrocket Blog</title><link>http://hashrocket.com/blog/posts/functional_eye_ruby_guy#comment-787540509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, support for that was removed between preview2 and rc1. The code above that uses "using" in the way it does doesn't work on rc1 and most likely won't work in Ruby 2.0 final either, alas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I made $2,000 in 7 days launching my ebook</title><link>http://aspirecode.com/how-i-made-2000-in-7-days-launching-my-ebook/#comment-778934117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad to hear it worked out! I must admit I forgot about including this and was surprised to be reminded, lol. Good one!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>