<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for wwhitlock</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/wwhitlock/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/wwhitlock/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:41:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Prepping for the coronavirus the Mormon way</title><link>https://religionnews.com/2020/03/05/prepping-for-the-coronavirus-the-mormon-way/#comment-4823300622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like climate change would fall under the umbrella of being ready for any disruption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best a Man Can Get: Hamptons Diarist | City Journal</title><link>https://www.city-journal.org/gillette-boycott#comment-4694008690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So there is no redemption to be had?&lt;br&gt;A lifetime boycott caused by one misdeed smells like cancel culture to me.&lt;br&gt;How is that different than shaming a person for messages sent years ago?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Thoughts on the Hope of Full Flowering</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2019/04/some-thoughts-on-the-hope-of-full-flowering.html#comment-4409858611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this. &lt;br&gt;The beautiful simplicity of the gospel is based on choice. With you, I believe there will be very few of us who choose to reject Our Father's love for us. No blessing will be forced or denied without our consent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maybe I should write that handbook on logical fallacies after all.</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2019/02/maybe-i-should-write-that-handbook-on-logical-fallacies-after-all.html#comment-4338035579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've not answered the question. &lt;br&gt;My religious experience is unique to me. Your experience is your own. Neither is germane to the question. &lt;br&gt;Why would a person who has a stated disbelief of a religious ceremony feel they have a right to attend those same ceremonies?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At one point in my life, I felt an affinity with the Republican party. I then changed my beliefs and left that party. I don't demand to stay on their mailing lists, vote in their primaries or serve as a delegate at their conventions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maybe I should write that handbook on logical fallacies after all.</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2019/02/maybe-i-should-write-that-handbook-on-logical-fallacies-after-all.html#comment-4336254087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would a person who has decided that Mormonism is not true want to pray in that church, perform baptisms, or attend any temple ceremonies? &lt;br&gt;These are not social events.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did intelligences have a gender?</title><link>https://askgramps.org/intelligences-have-gender/#comment-3928289660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn't answer the question. Our existence before becoming spirit children of our Father is not much described to us in the Scriptures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The answer you gave refers to our existence after becoming spirit children. Jesus Christ showed his spirit body to the brother of Jared. Also, The Family Proclamation specifically refers to being a spirit son or daughter of the Father.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We very well could have had gender before becoming spirit children. Or not. It's speculation either way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like Terryl Givens idea that we, as intelligence, chose to become a spirit child of God. Our Father does not force anyone. We could have easily chosen male or female at the time we chose to be born as a spirit. Or not. It's just speculation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:56:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Book of Mormon and botanical science</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2018/02/book-mormon-botanical-science.html#comment-3763872559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've wondered about Jacob's use of this allegory. Jacob was born in the wilderness. He would know nothing about olives and olive trees. There were none in the Americas until the Spaniards brought them.&lt;br&gt;Jacob could have easily learned about olives from Nephi and others who had lived in the Levant. But most of those people would have been gone by the time Jacob was called to be a prophet.&lt;br&gt;Jacob 5 seems to be a direct copy and paste from the Brass Plates. That brings me back to Jacob's motivation for including the allegory in his writings. This doesn't seem to be the best text for teaching the people of his time. I wouldn't resonate with them as it would in the Mediterranean coasts. &lt;br&gt;I'm tenitavely concluding that the allegory was included by Jacob and then by Mormon solely for the edification of the modern reader.&lt;br&gt;Am I missing something here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liberal Questionnaire Goes Out to 1st Graders</title><link>http://thoughtfulwomen.org/2014/03/24/liberal-questionnaire-goes-1st-graders/#comment-1359968118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is not Common Core. No matter what you think of Common Core, and I probably agree with much of what you believe, this questionnaire is not part of that discussion. This is a hoax. It is not part of Common Core. If you use this falsified post as part of your reasoning about Common Core, you are in error.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The folks who like Common Core will point out that you believe the hoaxes about CC and discredit anything else you may say, True or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:21:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liberal Questionnaire Goes Out to 1st Graders</title><link>http://thoughtfulwomen.org/2014/03/24/liberal-questionnaire-goes-1st-graders/#comment-1358377502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Speech disorders are often caused by external forces. A child could be reacting to parents divorce or abuse that no one knows about yet or a number of things.&lt;br&gt;The list doesn't apply to everybody. And the all questions don't necessarily get asked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you ever filled out a medical history at a doctor's office? That information is personal. Is it any of her business to know what might be causing your problem?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liberal Questionnaire Goes Out to 1st Graders</title><link>http://thoughtfulwomen.org/2014/03/24/liberal-questionnaire-goes-1st-graders/#comment-1358366241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The questions are not directed at first grade students. The form is a tool to help therapists know how to help individual students.&lt;br&gt;Who ever posted this hoax left the instructions and label on the form and claimed it went to first graders. Look at the title of the test. Look at the instructions. You can see that the form is for adults to use. The adult does not ask students these questions. &lt;br&gt;The handwriting in the margins was done by somebody who didn't understand the form or who willfully wrote lies in order to get a reaction.&lt;br&gt;Either way. It is irresponsible to keep the hoax going. There is no thought behind the post. Thoughtless women.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judge Orders Bizarre Punishment in Haircutting Crime</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/06/23/judge-orders-bizarre-punishment-in-haircutting-crime/#comment-565609906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Second sentence. "Two girls, ages 11 and 13, were at a McDonald’s when they approached a three-year-old girl and pretended to befriend her." &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Technology for Teachers: Free Stuff Friday - Coffee Mugs from Learn Boost</title><link>http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2011/08/free-stuff-friday-coffee-mugs-from.html#comment-278896775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This looks like a great resource. I'm just a little worried that it will be blocked by my district. It doesn't seem to like anything that uses Facebook to sign in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll find out Monday morning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Call for Writers for 148apps.com</title><link>http://www.148apps.com/news/call-writers/#comment-4529850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, read the text again. See where it says "free apps?" You don't leave a very good impression with a potential employer when you don't read their offer. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perhaps the Braves Spoke to Soon&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/12/braves-spoke/#comment-4512541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel for ya buddy. I just hope you don't get the last laugh when Furcal's back goes out again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Dodgers seem to have a knack for signing free agents and putting them on the DL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey, Andru Jones is still available. Anybody? Anybody? I hear crickets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Furcal Make a Return?</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/11/could-furcal-make-a-return/#comment-3873979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would hate to see Furcal leave the Dodgers. He's a great hitter and been a productive lead off hitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just don't think we're interested in keeping damaged goods. He played with an ankle injury for most of '07, probably should have gone on DL. He had the back thing this year. His return was really to short to tell, but it looks like it will be OK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck if you get him back.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any chance you'd like Andru Jones back too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:59:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are the Red Sox the Next Evil Empire?</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/10/are-the-red-sox-the-next-evil-empire-2/#comment-3017539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Red Sox are being cast to play the villain in Anaheim, home of the happiest place on earth. The Angels have a harder time getting passed Boston than they do deciding what city their stadium is in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons to Keep Watching Baseball</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/10/5-reasons-to-keep-watching-baseball/#comment-2914918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My reason for watching right now is the Dodger rebirth. For the last 20 years I've usually found a reason. If for no other reason than baseball is superior to any other sport.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The No Fun League is boring. Just committee meetings and violence with a few dancing millionaires every once in a while.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just watch. You'll get your reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:01:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Housekeeping</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/10/housekeeping/#comment-2885792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Viva los Dodgers. Thanks for the chance to vote for the Dodgers again. Keep posting those polls that have the Dodgers as the right answer and I'll keep doing them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cubs See 0-2 Hole</title><link>http://www.braveslaunchpad.com/2008/10/cubs-see-0-2-hole/#comment-2823048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I almost felt sorry for Zambrano last night. His boys didn't back him up. I haven't watched the Cubbies much this year, but they have to be better than they played last night.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Viva Los Dodgers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Betrayal and Hope</title><link>http://www.talatorre.com/2008/07/betrayal-and-hope/#comment-885300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We talked about Korihor in GD today. I'm seeing similarities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People are free to do and believe whatever they want. If they choose to oppose the prophet, that's their right. But they shouldn't be surprised to find they are outside of the Church.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm starting a series of posts on this topic. The first is here &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/57j8qh" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/57j8qh"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/57j8qh&lt;/a&gt; I'd like to read your comments on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>