<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of winson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/winson/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:19:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Coming sooon: The Bluetooth Watch. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/comingSooonTheBluetoothWat.html#comment-28012868</link><description>Those are all interesting ideas</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The mother of all business models. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/02/theMotherOfAllBusinessMode.html#comment-28010854</link><description>I like</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:48:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The mother of all business models. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/02/theMotherOfAllBusinessMode.html#comment-27981141</link><description>There are millions of celebrities these days, they call themselves "social&lt;br&gt;media experts."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming sooon: The Bluetooth Watch. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/comingSooonTheBluetoothWat.html#comment-27929527</link><description>You need to say it THREE times?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming sooon: The Bluetooth Watch. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/comingSooonTheBluetoothWat.html#comment-27928649</link><description>Gotcha. And I said that was uncreative and closed-minded, but encouraged you&lt;br&gt;not to feel bad because all generations are filled with people with such&lt;br&gt;limits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What's wrong with this picture? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/16/whatswrongwiththispicture.html#comment-27924903</link><description>Bing!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming sooon: The Bluetooth Watch. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/comingSooonTheBluetoothWat.html#comment-27924866</link><description>Well every generation is filled with uncreative people with closed minds who&lt;br&gt;think their way is the only way. My generation has a fair number of them&lt;br&gt;too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was driven yesterday by a NY cabbie who was probably in his twenties who&lt;br&gt;said people my age don't understand technology. See what I mean! I probably&lt;br&gt;had more technology in my pocket than he has in his whole friggin&lt;br&gt;house.(Though not on my wrist, see above.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's funny how it's okay to say people are stupid because they're older than&lt;br&gt;you but you can't say someone is stupid because they're out driving a cab on&lt;br&gt;the coldest night of the year and are so clueless as to insult the guy who's&lt;br&gt;deciding at that exact moment how much to tip him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The mother of all business models. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/02/theMotherOfAllBusinessMode.html#comment-27845939</link><description>I'm wondering if Amazon is already doing this</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27835854</link><description>First, welcome to my humble weblog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your howto's were instrumental in getting my implementation of OAuth up and&lt;br&gt;running in 2009.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would have helped to have a validator app that covered all the basic&lt;br&gt;functionality, but Joseph Smarr did that for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, I think my essay *is* an accurate representation, from the point of&lt;br&gt;view of an implementor who is not an OAuth insider. That perspective is&lt;br&gt;important too, although if you read the comments, you'll see that I agree&lt;br&gt;with you that it was a mistake to call the new thread OAuth. Hopefully the&lt;br&gt;people responsible for this will realize they made a mistake and will&lt;br&gt;rectify it before there's too much more confusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same thing came up with RSS, believe it or not. The spec for RSS 2.0&lt;br&gt;said very clearly that new formats must take new names, and the IETF&lt;br&gt;respected that when they did Atom. Even so I argued that they should start&lt;br&gt;the Atom work with RSS 2.0, but they did a whole new thing, renaming every&lt;br&gt;element. Sounds like the same process is happening with OAuth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems that when a format or protocol freezes, it should say so&lt;br&gt;specifically and in the Roadmap, in the spec it should lay down the&lt;br&gt;groundrules for future formats. If you do that, it seems people will respect&lt;br&gt;it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I think OAuth 1.0 will keep going. That's why after writing this&lt;br&gt;narrative yesterday I realized I should maintain my implementation. I made a&lt;br&gt;few changes and once again it interops with Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS: Here's what the RSS 2.0 Roadmap says: "RSS is by no means a perfect format, but it is very popular and widely supported. Having a settled spec is something RSS has needed for a long time. The purpose of this work is to help it become a unchanging thing, to foster growth in the market that is developing around it, and to clear the path for innovation in new syndication formats. Therefore, the RSS spec is, for all practical purposes, frozen at version 2.0.1. We anticipate possible 2.0.2 or 2.0.3 versions, etc. only for the purpose of clarifying the specification, not for adding new features to the format. Subsequent work should happen in modules, using namespaces, and in completely new syndication formats, with new names."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27805153</link><description>I'd be willing to bet that Blaine is right, and that the IETF will spend a few years on mail lists and in the meantime the OAuth that we all implemented last year will turn out to be the standard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either that or Basic Authentication will continue to rule the twittosphere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27804845</link><description>Actually what developers hear is "Wait -- they're ripping up the pavement. Don't deploy."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27804788</link><description>Interesting -- since I only follow OAuth peripherally, I have no idea how to&lt;br&gt;parse all this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the IETF isn't just ratifying and documenting the existing OAuth protocol&lt;br&gt;they shouldn't call it OAuth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imho of course.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27787598</link><description>Totally agree. They should call it something else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:46:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27787578</link><description>Blaine. that's exactly the conclusion I came to shortly after writing this&lt;br&gt;piece. I fixed the bugs in my implementation of OAuth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://frontiernews.org/2010/01/01/updated-oauth-support-to-work-with-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://frontiernews.org/2010/01/01/updated-oaut...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's just use it as-is, and if someone wants to make something new and use&lt;br&gt;the OAuth name, well that's not very nice, but in the meantime we can keep&lt;br&gt;deploying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indiana Holmes. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/indianaHolmes.html#comment-27771909</link><description>I was ready for something more cerebral. I mean Sherlock Holmes is about&lt;br&gt;fucking with your mind, not punching people in the kidneys and giant spools&lt;br&gt;of stuff rolling into the Thames (and a damsel in distress on a meat hook&lt;br&gt;for crying out loud).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OAuth is becoming a cautionary tale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/01/oauthIsBecomingACautionary.html#comment-27771683</link><description>I'm sure it does, but it's not open source, so I can't bundle it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming sooon: The Bluetooth Watch. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/31/comingSooonTheBluetoothWat.html#comment-27666963</link><description>Yes but if your watch was on the net it'd be cooooooool</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New core Frontier feature: S3 Prefs. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/30/newCoreFrontierFeatureS3Pr.html#comment-27627265</link><description>You must be very young. I say that as someone who is the caretaker, today,&lt;br&gt;of the data two relatives who have passed on.  This problem is here now, for&lt;br&gt;me, not someday in the distant future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming soon: A Twitter camera. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/27/comingSoonATwitterCamera.html#comment-27611942</link><description>The key thing is the UI for selecting which pictures to upload. That's why I&lt;br&gt;explained it the way I did. Uploading only happens on a user action. And to&lt;br&gt;make it simple, it has to be part of the camera, not an add-on like Eye-Fi.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Person of the Decade?! (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/30/personOfTheDecade.html#comment-27611940</link><description>Old is such a crude word. Could we find another way of expressing respect,&lt;br&gt;perhaps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't learn patience or subtlety until you have a few years on you.&lt;br&gt;That's why young people aren't so good at seduction, and something like&lt;br&gt;podcasting is totally a seduction. The technology isn't that hard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New core Frontier feature: S3 Prefs. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/30/newCoreFrontierFeatureS3Pr.html#comment-27611925</link><description>For permanence though you want to get it the content somewhere like S3 which&lt;br&gt;is probably going to be the last Internet site to fail.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It works! (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/30/itWorks.html#comment-27600253</link><description>It totally works without Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marrying RSS and Twitter. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/29/marryingRssAndTwitter.html#comment-27596659</link><description>Actually Tumblr doesn't do rssCloud, yet. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have hopes that they will...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It works! (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/30/itWorks.html#comment-27579145</link><description>Was wondering if anyone would notice. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll tell you another thing -- it's going to have an easy UI for linking and&lt;br&gt;it won't need no stinkin URL shortener.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Probably not much of a surprise, eh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anil Dash, tear down that wall. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/12/29/anilDashTearDownThatWall.html#comment-27556768</link><description>"Anil Dash who is trying to build a career bridging the tech world and&lt;br&gt;government cannot afford to appear to be in the pocket of a single tech&lt;br&gt;company, yet that is exactly how it appears."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:31:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>