<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for winkerbean</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-ec2b2c4b" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/winkerbean/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:32:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TiddlyWiki and LaTeX - Scientific Notebooks Made Easy</title><link>http://www.zaphu.com/2007/10/10/tiddlywiki-and-latex-scientific-notebooks-made-easy/#comment-514745</link><description>The regulations can be found at &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/52mskb" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/52mskb&lt;/a&gt;.  (I'd post the hold link but it's an ugly one.)  Specifically, the regulations I'm think of are the ones for "Closed Systems" (24 CFR 11.10).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">winkerbean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TiddlyWiki and LaTeX - Scientific Notebooks Made Easy</title><link>http://www.zaphu.com/2007/10/10/tiddlywiki-and-latex-scientific-notebooks-made-easy/#comment-514182</link><description>But would TiddlyWiki meet the 24 CFR 11 requirements?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">winkerbean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>