<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for vaxocentric</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-88b69c0f" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/vaxocentric/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:15:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Radio Popper</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/03/19/radio-popper/#comment-245817</link><description>Oh yeah! I saw those featured on Strobist and I can't wait to get my hands on some. Very cool gadget!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vaxocentric</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lens go boom</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/03/15/lens-go-boom/#comment-234348</link><description>oh man! that's a horrible feeling. the only one I ever dropped was my sigma 30mm f/1.4 and it just about killed me to see all that money go *poof*. hopefully this is the last lens you'll ever drop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the up side- new lens time! ;)&lt;br&gt;i've been eyeballing that 18-200 vr for my travels...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vaxocentric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the time really does fly</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/29/the-time-really-does-fly/#comment-195145</link><description>Ugh... I have so much to learn for when I finally harvest a baby...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd like to see some less dramatic, high-key shots!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vaxocentric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus vs IntenseDebate: wrap up</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/24/disqus-vs-intensedebate-wrap-up/#comment-175288</link><description>Well, I signed up for Disqus- seems like a cool service, but after hearing your review, I'm very disappointed they don't support OpenID (though not like I use it... yet). I totally agree with your decision to go with them versus IntenseDebate for the reasons you described- it's important to be able to easily and efficiently communicate, which is the whole purpose.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vaxocentric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:57:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: guess what?</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-173850</link><description>I'm quite jealous of your new toy. I hear the noise management is phenomenal. If my D200 wasn't completely adequate for my needs, I'd go with the D300. I'm still toying with the thought of going with the D3, but I think I'll wait for the next model to come out (maybe D3X...) so it pushes the price down (maybe.. didn't do it much for the D2-D2X). Really, it's so I can have a full-frame sensor for portraits (for the shallow DoF). But that's pretty damn hard to justify the price until I start doing more portraiture and have a demand for that image style.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vaxocentric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>