<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for upnunder</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/upnunder/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/upnunder/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:35:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are magazine publishers being well served by their trade press?</title><link>http://mturro.bluepear.org/2008/03/20/are-magazine-publishers-being-well-served-by-their-trade-press/#comment-253617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Michael,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read your post on PubExec regarding NewBay Media and I don't disagree at all with your feelings about the article.  There maybe should have been a "work in progress" angle to the story since we have 50+ sites, many of them God-awful in their look and backend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We/I also inherited sites and online products that had been after-thoughts at best by previous management based on their magazine-first mentality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But has initial cross-marketing of the audiences via forums and content proven to be an increasing source of revenue?  You bet.&lt;br&gt;Perhaps there will be a follow-up article, which hopefully doesn't mention the played out Web2.0 buzzword, and we can then showcase the progress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't mind connecting with you to hear the hurdles you have seen and overcome at M. Shanken.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Talk to you soon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joe Ferrick&lt;br&gt;VP, Web Development&lt;br&gt;NewBay Media&lt;br&gt;212-378-0410&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">upnunder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>