<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tweetip</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-12c7b847" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/tweetip/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:17:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: If The Message Is Important, It Will Find Me</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/05/if-the-message-is-important-it-will-find-me.html#comment-10299913</link><description>depends on if i'm watching or just listening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/110423768#comment-9716942</link><description>Bought it. Beautiful song. Curiously, when I'm rested, I translate any mention of 'you' / 'your' to 'us' collectively. This bug in my thinking changes the message profoundly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 01:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Computer, What Is WolframAlpha?</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/109443689#comment-9511662</link><description>I imagine a time when all search engines have an open api where tools can merge &amp; thinslice for discovery - 4 all the answers live in this place being the firehose.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Little Twitter Tool I Want</title><link>http://blog.kortina.net/post/98280592#comment-8477511</link><description>both request already done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/97770552#comment-8362059</link><description>13?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Growth: 125% Increase In Last 2 Months
 In... - Joe Lazarus</title><link>http://joelaz.com/post/92707366#comment-8317490</link><description>Joe - if you haven't looked, the number is a bit diff now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:51:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is at least a dress rehearsal (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/04/14/twitterIsAtLeastADressRehe.html#comment-8218560</link><description>Phil - tagging outside twitter - we're doing that.  &lt;a href="http://tweetip.us/lkyua" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tweetip.us/lkyua&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:19:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That's Only Ten Lines Of Code</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/thats-only-ten-lines-of-code.html#comment-8107450</link><description>Still in fucking awe of Twitter being twitter. We love bow hunters. We love all of you. You are what the tech industry could have been, should have been    ; (&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you all cash out hugely tomorrow, Monday, April 13, 2009, everyone of you deserve it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;13x over :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That's Only Ten Lines Of Code</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/thats-only-ten-lines-of-code.html#comment-7968621</link><description>Thanks Fred. Our career path offers almost no peer review, so your comments &amp; support mean a bunch. The project I've been working on since '92 is important to Sylvi &amp; I, and, if twitter stays independent, them too. I'm in awe of how Twitter is being twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We've been scaling back here a bit - tired - I'm not sure you who pay attention understand the environment we have to create to analyze the data coming in. It's not all 'code' on a mac. I'm working on it even as I type this - - an EQ in LA is alarming my iphone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This project is deep. It is more than 10 lines. It is NOT fun. If I succeed, it will change our understanding of evolution and reality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I don't succeed, I have already answered for myself what is real, and what is hard work :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That's Only Ten Lines Of Code</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/thats-only-ten-lines-of-code.html#comment-7654648</link><description>We've coded our own bit.ly functions inhouse, and it's more than 10 lines of code :) I'm also thinking I should have focused on that code instead of what i'm sitting here doing right now! Otoh, as Nathan suggest, maybe in another decade, I'll have our primary stuff in one line of, umm, "code".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any funding flowing to twitter-ish developers is a good thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betaworks - The government needs to give Tesla the money it...</title><link>http://betaworks.com/post/91280741#comment-7648427</link><description>This thought ignores the impact of mining/mfg/etc. Replacing things in this way won't help. Stop using things, or using things smartly, will help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter quakes as San Francisco shakes</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/30/twitter-quakes-as-san-francisco-shakes/#comment-7647039</link><description>Quake stats. Our Twitter client tagged, b4 USGS main site reported, 769 tweets from Twitter's datamine feed, and 2,468 tweets from twitter search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1st Tweets timeline &lt;a href="http://tweetip.us/lk36w" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tweetip.us/lk36w&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betaworks - Content isn’t king, except to media mogul types...</title><link>http://betaworks.com/post/90423571#comment-7572706</link><description>Hmm - the number one reader of my tweets are Link Bots :) most originating from AWS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:21:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/89707864#comment-7517490</link><description>The folks who have held office for the past 8 years were also persistent. And they listened to their tribe. And only to their tribe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betaworks - Most entrepreneurs travel down the startup path...</title><link>http://betaworks.com/post/89692003#comment-7496117</link><description>Agreed. The path for innovation is well worn though in our future economy may need re-routed. The path for invention is filled with bottomless pits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Financial McCarthyism</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/financial-mccarthyism.html#comment-7487196</link><description>Fred, there is a very real possibility that investing in Wall Street and REIT's are on the same path as investing in GM, Ford, and AIG.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Financial McCarthyism</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/financial-mccarthyism.html#comment-7470152</link><description>I'll continue to view Wallstreet as a high stakes game with no moral rule. As the World focuses on what "can" be blamed, I suggest wondering who might be the ones who won and what position they've taken, and then adjust the thinking for the "fix".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thinking about Education and Learning</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/82809738#comment-6813137</link><description>Curiously, we think the design bit hides in the blind bit :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thinking about Education and Learning</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/82809738#comment-6812684</link><description>Great post Albert. About your aside : google : In 2004 I emailed Google asking for a feed of realtime data, suggesting there was something more happening than search could find. Never heard back :) as their stock rocketed from $139 to a high of $700+. The rise in their pps points to how deeply flawed the 'code' running our civilization is. That code is set early and hard. From a purely sustainable point of view, this code won't scale to handle the issues we are about to face, together. @nk twittered earlier today during the power meltdown; "There are times to solve problems and there are times to blindly work around them." - This bit of info will never float to the top of google, but for me it is a marker. And by blind, we infer 'participatory feeling'. This feeling is what we, collectively, are numb-ed to and what artists struggle to remember.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Thing You Don't Need To Be An Entrepreneur: A College Degree</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/one-thing-you-dont-need-to-be-an-entrepreneur-a-college-degree.html#comment-6673272</link><description>I'm 49. I'm just now ready to go to college :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Growth
 I was curious how fast Twitter was... - Joe Lazarus</title><link>http://joelaz.com/post/80584424#comment-6491203</link><description>With an hour to go, our stats show 3.1 million updates today based on beginning/ending statusid. hth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch, Using Compete To Measure a Twitter Client Stat is Plain Wrong</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/02/techcrunch-using-compete-to-measure-a-twitter-client-stat-is-plain-wrong.html#comment-6425960</link><description>TwitStat numbers are not representative. They pull their rankings from those people who follow @twitstat - so if you want to skew their numbers, which seems someone is doing just that, follow them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here’s how Twitter’s datamining feed ranks twitter clients (web 47%, twitterfeed 9%, tweetdeck 8%, twitterfox 4%, twhirl 4%, txt 4%)… &lt;a href="http://tweetip.us/lkx1a" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tweetip.us/lkx1a&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betaworks - When people go into a meeting they have two goals:...</title><link>http://betaworks.com/post/79063299#comment-6378462</link><description>"Could large groups of animals function together as a single entity with distributed intelligence? Did evolution work through such groups, selecting at the group level rather than the individual?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're wondering - would evolution favor 10 min thought or long thought now? The implications might be staggering. Oh! Stand? That's so, like, druid...   &lt;a href="http://tweetip.us/lk4u1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tweetip.us/lk4u1&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/79323198#comment-6371088</link><description>"...all the previous work in the field..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fields. With fences. Limiting thought. Killing creation. Fields are a root to the reason 'genius invention' are so very few if no more. Not everyone should do work in a field.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: betaworks - When people go into a meeting they have two goals:...</title><link>http://betaworks.com/post/79063299#comment-6369089</link><description>seems to us maybe if meetings were a bit longer, like 9 days, the World may be a bit more wise. of course, who has time for that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>