<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for topfunky</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/topfunky/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:18:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Waging War on Whitespace (using TextMate)</title><link>http://blogobaggins.disqus.com/waging_war_on_whitespace_using_textmate/#comment-21970396</link><description>Emacs also has the cleanup-buffer command that not only deletes trailing whitespace but also formats your code nicely, including enforcing tabs or spaces (according to your configuration).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or, try whitespace-mode to see trailing whitespace displayed in ugly colors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroku | Bringing Heroku to the East Coast</title><link>http://heroku.disqus.com/heroku_bringing_heroku_to_the_east_coast/#comment-13927527</link><description>I can verify that Blake's presence will be inspirational, entertaining, and enlightening. Send a request now before someone else gets him first!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.foysavas.com/blog/2008/12/25/lets-be-clear-the-rails-monoculture-is-over.html</title><link>http://foysavas.disqus.com/thread_43/#comment-4673067</link><description>I don't understand why so many Rubyists ignore Ramaze.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ramazist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:11:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.foysavas.com/blog/2008/12/25/lets-be-clear-the-rails-monoculture-is-over.html</title><link>http://foysavas.disqus.com/thread_43/#comment-4660142</link><description>So Merb got a stable API that we announce we will not break until 2.0 which is now replaced by Rails 3.0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The merge doesn't really change that aspect of things, however having a more modular version of Rails will allow developers to focus on different aspects of the framework and experiment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Matt</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Aimonetti</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.foysavas.com/blog/2008/12/25/lets-be-clear-the-rails-monoculture-is-over.html</title><link>http://foysavas.disqus.com/thread_43/#comment-4657602</link><description>My question (which can be answered only by time) is:  How will this effect the dialog within the Ruby community about how web frameworks should be built?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over the last 6 months Merb has been free to break backwards compatibility and try out many new ideas. Some of those ideas will now be part of Rails. ActiveRecord has also been influenced slightly by DataMapper.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that Merb is officially part of Rails, who will take up the "other side" of the conversation? Smaller frameworks such as Sinatra never tried to do all of what Rails does.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webslingers' Journal - Okay, so Rails really is getting easier to deploy....</title><link>http://wsj.disqus.com/webslingers_journal_okay_so_rails_really_is_getting_easier_to_deploy/#comment-4633064</link><description>Okay, following the example &lt;a href="http://github.com/kwe/passenger-django-wsgi-example/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, this is pretty much exactly as easy with Django as it is with Rails. I wonder why I haven't heard more about this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:19:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webslingers' Journal - Okay, so Rails really is getting easier to deploy....</title><link>http://wsj.disqus.com/webslingers_journal_okay_so_rails_really_is_getting_easier_to_deploy/#comment-4447060</link><description>I have heard something about using Passenger / WSGI with Django. I'll have to look into that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webslingers' Journal - Okay, so Rails really is getting easier to deploy....</title><link>http://wsj.disqus.com/webslingers_journal_okay_so_rails_really_is_getting_easier_to_deploy/#comment-4438896</link><description>Passenger does WSGI, too. Maybe it would work with Django out of the box?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outside the Firewall - Bought the PeepCode screencast for Rspec, grabbing...</title><link>http://stevenbshaffer.disqus.com/outside_the_firewall_bought_the_peepcode_screencast_for_rspec_grabbing/#comment-4120953</link><description>Popcorn would be great!  Sprinkle the carmel seasoning on it and I'm good to&lt;br&gt;go.  Love Peepcode.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevenbshaffer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:01:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My dream videocam - Lars Pind</title><link>http://pindscom.disqus.com/my_dream_videocam_lars_pind/#comment-3995960</link><description>I just bought a Panasonic TZ5 for taking videos of my son (US$200). The video is great (HD) but the audio quality is horrible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that's the hardest thing to get right...most portable video cameras don't have a quality microphone or an external audio input.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outside the Firewall - Bought the PeepCode screencast for Rspec, grabbing...</title><link>http://stevenbshaffer.disqus.com/outside_the_firewall_bought_the_peepcode_screencast_for_rspec_grabbing/#comment-3990479</link><description>Thanks for supporting PeepCode. Maybe I should offer a screencast+popcorn promotion!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">topfunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Humanscale Freedom</title><link>http://jaikoo.disqus.com/humanscale_freedom/#comment-3737246</link><description>Glad to see I'm in great company:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jaikoo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:23:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Humanscale Freedom</title><link>http://jaikoo.disqus.com/humanscale_freedom/#comment-3704932</link><description>A great chair! I've used one for about a year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want To Learn About Rails 2.2? Get The Envycast and PDF</title><link>http://thepuertoricanrailsdude.disqus.com/want_to_learn_about_rails_22_get_the_envycast_and_pdf/#comment-3640840</link><description>Thanks for the props! I'm glad you find the PeepCode PDF layout to be non-boring.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video blogging is hard work - Lars Pind</title><link>http://pindscom.disqus.com/video_blogging_is_hard_work_lars_pind/#comment-2945150</link><description>I've used AppleScript and Ruby to wire together my release process. If you're doing it several times a week, it quickly becomes worthwhile to spend a few days to write some scripts or possibly hire someone to do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are many apps that automate this process for podcasts (I use Ubercaster), but video isn't as well served.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A small tip...the Levelator app from Conversations Network will do an acceptable job at equalizing volume levels and involves only a drag and drop.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PeepCode - Even their PDF books are awesome</title><link>http://thepuertoricanrailsdude.disqus.com/peepcode_even_their_pdf_books_are_awesome/#comment-3640831</link><description>Thanks for the props! I'm glad you have found PeepCode useful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We just added an assistant and an editor and hope to publish quality content even more frequently.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:21:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rails Shared Hosting</title><link>http://mattmaroon.disqus.com/rails_shared_hosting/#comment-74864</link><description>I totally agree that many people start with shared hosts. I did a few years ago, and I had many headaches trying to deploy Rails at Dreamhost. Once I finally got it figured out, it was time to move on to a VPS and I haven't looked back (although I still host the Ruby on Rails Podcast site on Dreamhost shared hosting).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think you have also missed one of the main features of Rails...the development environment and local webserver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who want to learn Rails don't even need to pay $5/month. They can pay $0 by learning how to use it on their local machine. Granted, this doesn't get them a publicly accessible webserver, but it's enough to develop an application and find out if it's worth paying $10-20/month to deploy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I started web development with Perl in 1997, I had to compile Apache, figure out how to edit configuration files, and stumble through arcane (or absent) error messages. Because of that, I became pretty confident in configuring Apache, but I wouldn't have needed to learn that if I had something like the Mac OS X Locomotive app for Rails. You download it, hit the Go button, and you're running a local development webserver with Rails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you like the way it works, then you can pursue other options for making it available on the Internet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>