<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tomreeves</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/tomreeves/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:31:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Question of the Week: Six Words</title><link>http://litpark.disqus.com/question_of_the_week_six_words/#comment-122792</link><description>Dude goes what.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-89026</link><description>Thanks for the blast of common sense. It's better than spewed nonsense.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88787</link><description>Tom - don't worry about faddah.  He's part of the Twitter Generation. He flutters about from post to post and doesn't really read what he's responding to. Me thinks he might have ADD. A Twitter side-effect perhaps?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr. Poopypants</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88706</link><description>God did she abuse that poem, and possibility the entire canon of twentieth century American poetry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88643</link><description>She started it.  She was mean to poetry.  Poetry couldn't defend itself, so FSJ stepped in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Handy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:11:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88618</link><description>I am uncomfortable with the meanness, too. FSJ seems to be using more meanness and less humor lately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88614</link><description>Are you saying that I'm a troll for writing something mildly critical of the quality of FSJ's last bit of parody? I assume that you don't think that FSJ is a troll. What is this post we are commenting about? High praise? Or do you want only agreeable people to post?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88480</link><description>nice try, troll.  no one's linking to your blog. fergit it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faddah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who says people in the Valley don't know anything about literature?</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/who_says_people_in_the_valley_dont_know_anything_about_literature/#comment-88326</link><description>My comment only relates to this post by virtue of YouTube. I watched the Crunchie YouTube of your presentation. I posted that you had jumped the shark. You had some hellion e-mail bomb me. What's up with that? There is a modest accounting of it on my blog (&lt;a href="http://pwnership.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;pwnership.com&lt;/a&gt;).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:20:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News flash: Grown man able to operate XO machine.</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/news_flash_grown_man_able_to_operate_xo_machine/#comment-87584</link><description>FSJ: You have jumped the shark. You're done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNET on music: Right advice, wrong lessons</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/cnet_on_music_right_advice_wrong_lessons_95/#comment-86231</link><description>Sorry, Tom -- I'll try and knock it off  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No need to apologize for the link -- that's a good post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNET on music: Right advice, wrong lessons</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/cnet_on_music_right_advice_wrong_lessons_95/#comment-86202</link><description>Would you please stop with the reasonable, insightful commentary that's fun to read? Your hogging it is all I'm saying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd point out that the subtext is that labels should give the bands more of the revenues. Wishing it will never make it so. I commented on this on my blog, linking to this article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So Radiohead tried out a different model. They wanted a different, and perhaps better alternative. They sure seemed successful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Odds will always be stacked badly if your business model is 90% for you and 10% for me. Volume is a b***h if you are an obscure band with a small fan base.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apologies for the link: &lt;a href="http://pwnership.com/your-band-can-live-off-of-1cd-right/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://pwnership.com/your-band-can-live-off-of-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if everything was watermarked?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/what_if_everything_was_watermarked_85/#comment-75831</link><description>I linked to this article and also the YouTube video. And complemented the author. The juxtaposition of the Wired article and the discussion of the Amen break video is brilliant. I wish I had something more insightful to add, but both my football teams lost. I'm going to go sulk now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:58:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if everything was watermarked?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/what_if_everything_was_watermarked_85/#comment-75822</link><description>Thanks a lot, Tom -- relevant links are always welcome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:50:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if everything was watermarked?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/what_if_everything_was_watermarked_85/#comment-75812</link><description>Pardon me if you'd rather not have a link posted, but YouTube has a great video on the Amen brake. The link: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love your blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fiddling while the music industry burned</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/fiddling_while_the_music_industry_burned_80/#comment-75474</link><description>Thanks, Tom.  I appreciate the comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:09:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fiddling while the music industry burned</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/fiddling_while_the_music_industry_burned_80/#comment-75460</link><description>Love the work you put on the blog. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fiddling while the music industry burned</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/fiddling_while_the_music_industry_burned_80/#comment-75459</link><description>Thanks for the link to the Economist article. I also posted on it (&lt;a href="http://pwnership.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;pwnership.com&lt;/a&gt;), and linked to this blog. My thoughts are that yes, the labels ran their business horribly. That fact doesn't artists from abdicating the responsibility to change and adapt to the disintermediation cause by the internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's simple to suggest, 'well if the record labels get torn apart, what's a poor little band to do?' That mindset isn't directly discussed, and perhaps should be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomreeves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:53:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>