<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tomguarriello</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-de4701eb" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/tomguarriello/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:14:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Stats Confirm It: Teens Don&amp;#8217;t Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/teens-dont-tweet/#comment-14704814</link><description>I'm 62. Guess that makes us both curvebusters!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stats Confirm It: Teens Don&amp;#8217;t Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/teens-dont-tweet/#comment-14704782</link><description>Here's one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symmetric Follow and Second Twitter Accounts</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/12/symmetric-follo.html#comment-4789116</link><description>I like the use of the word "undertow" in this context.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Correspondence Is Making A Comeback</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/12/correspondence.html#comment-4677184</link><description>Interesting. I've been thinking about McLuhan's "tetrad" this weekend. McLuhan asked four questions about every technology:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. What does it enhance?&lt;br&gt;2. What does it obsolesce?&lt;br&gt;3. What does it revive?&lt;br&gt;4. When fully deployed, what reversal of an older technology does it encourage?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, let's see, the telephone enhanced real time, person-to-person communication. As you point out, it made letter writing largely obsolete. It revived the intimacy of the village which began to be lost with increased mobility. Now that it is fully deployed, we see a revival of the written word but with the reach enabled by electronic means. I suspect we're also seeing a re-appreciation of the "localness" that was lost when anybody could talk to anyone, anywhere, anytime. (Remember when a "long distance call" meant something special?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama's bone-headedness, day 2 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/12/23/obamasBoneheadednessDay2.html#comment-4596985</link><description>I saw Warren at TED and found him to be an interesting, intelligent person. That doesn't mean I believe any bit of what he does, but I was impressed with him that day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-571623</link><description>Good to see someone make the distinction between being an extravert and being outgoing. These are two very different things, although the popular use of the term "extrovert" had made them equivalent in most people's minds. I find extraverts, like myself, eager to gain energy from online interaction as well as RL f-2-f contact. The distinctions will always remain but for digital natives they're blurring. Outgoing communicators, also like myself, find the online world, especially video, highly attractive as a means of quickly working out ideas and presenting them for others reactions. Just as I found when I started blogging four years ago.  Good comment, PCGuy and excellent post, Fred. Many, like Mike Arrington, will argue that you're overstating the appetite for expression by a factor of 100, but these are likely to have been the same reactions people received at the idea that everyone would want a telephone in their home, or a cell phone in their pocket. Who would they all possibly need to speak with? The answer: everybody else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:31:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Very Smart Obama Supporter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/a-very-smart-ob.html#comment-363896</link><description>"Slimy politician"...wow! And, not voting IS logical, Brad? I'm curious: ever seen a politician you could support?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Very Smart Obama Supporter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/a-very-smart-ob.html#comment-362261</link><description>Well, Mike UNLEARNING is enormously difficult, as you know from the Saturn challenge. And, while age doesn't necessarily equal rigidity, McCain and Clinton look like old pols without motivation to do anything differently while Obama looks to be ready to deeply innovate. At least that's the way I see it. Good to hear from you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Very Smart Obama Supporter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/a-very-smart-ob.html#comment-362258</link><description>Well, Mike UNLEARNING is enormously difficult, as you know from the Saturn challenge. And, while age doesn't necessarily equal rigidity, McCain and Clinton look like old pols without motivation to do anything differently while Obama looks to be ready to deeply innovate. At least that's the way I see it. Good to hear from you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Run Straight Down? No.</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/run-straight-do.html#comment-356709</link><description>Yup, maybe it's you or maybe it's me, but, either way, I'm happy to be in the company of geniuses like Steve Pinker on this one. Thanks for the comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WoW is Right</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/wow-is-right.html#comment-317799</link><description>I think women are much more open to inter-generational collaboration than men. Somehow, we get all "alpha" about those situations. Good point about Leo! Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:34:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WoW is Right</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/wow-is-right.html#comment-317792</link><description>I think women are much more open to inter-generational collaboration than men. Somehow, we get all "alpha" about those situations. Good point about Leo! Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Yous Are There?</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/how-many-yous-a.html#comment-314583</link><description>Wilver Darnell Stargell could put fear in the heart of pitchers with that routine!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope all's well down there in Plano.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Yous Are There?</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/how-many-yous-a.html#comment-309489</link><description>That's from way back in the "We Are Fam-a-LEE" era!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statistics on verified profiles</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2008/03/25/statistics-on-verified-profiles/#comment-305680</link><description>Well, unfortunately, email verification is a pretty weak identity certifier. This is a step in the right direction but email verification isn't a real troll deterrent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping Through Twitter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/flipping-throug.html#comment-305615</link><description>Hey, Daniel, didn't realize you were Disqus founder. People have been complaining about not being able to register for Disqus from here. Not sure what OS, browser, etc. I'm really enjoying the service so far. Now, if you could only extend it to YouTube comments...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:38:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping Through Twitter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/flipping-throug.html#comment-305130</link><description>Kinda cool, isn't it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping Through Twitter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/flipping-throug.html#comment-304668</link><description>Thanks, Warren. Yes, there is this Puritan ethic that still gnaws at  &lt;br&gt;us, leading us to feel "wasteful" if we don't read every word. Today,  &lt;br&gt;it's get what you can when you can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad you found my blog. Look forward to getting to know you better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping Through Twitter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/flipping-throug.html#comment-304135</link><description>I think the temporary unfollow option would be very helpful. Can't you set up SMS alert in Twitterberry? Check follow profiles and turn SMS notice "on." Works to cell phones.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping Through Twitter</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/flipping-throug.html#comment-304132</link><description>I think that's how we all start, Rob. I found it very interesting to follow others to bring a little serendipity into the mix. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Story's Story Thusfar</title><link>http://www.truetalkblog.com/truetalk/2008/04/the-storys-stor.html#comment-302269</link><description>Testing out the Disqus comment module.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomguarriello</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:35:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>