<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thetitan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/thetitan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/thetitan/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:38:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Domain Record Information</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/hivemail.net#comment-727338940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In September of 2010, &lt;a href="http://HiveMail.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="HiveMail.net"&gt;HiveMail.net&lt;/a&gt; was sold via GoDaddy premium listings for $200.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hivemail.net Domain Record Info</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/hivemail.net#comment-723169011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In September of 2010, &lt;a href="http://HiveMail.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="HiveMail.net"&gt;HiveMail.net&lt;/a&gt; was sold via GoDaddy premium listings for $200.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Record Info for twitter.com</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/twitter.com#comment-727338720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter, the popular "what I'm up to now" and "here is another link for you to look at" social network site has picked up &lt;a href="http://domainrecord.info/whois/t.co" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domainrecord.info/whois/t.co"&gt;T.co&lt;/a&gt;, which it plans to use to wrap all URLs posted on its network by its users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Record Info for twitter.com</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/twitter.com#comment-723168926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter, the popular "what I&amp;amp;#039m up to now" and "here is another link for you to look at" social network site has picked up &lt;a href="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=t.co" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=t.co"&gt;T.co&lt;/a&gt;, which it plans to use to wrap all URLs posted on its network by its users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Record Information</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/bido.com#comment-727338878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Bido.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bido.com"&gt;Bido.com&lt;/a&gt;, the domain auction site, is closing today May 5, 2010. That's according to a tweet on &lt;a href="http://domainrecord.info/whois/twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domainrecord.info/whois/twitter.com"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, from yesterday - May 4, 2010:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bido is ceasing operation as of May 5, 2010. All transactions and accounts will be gracefully finalized and closed.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The company has been in existence since early 2008. Unfortunately, after changing it's auction model a hand full of times, it has not been successful in finding a winning formula for revenue growth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is some more information and some interesting comments at &lt;a href="http://domainrecord.info/whois/domainnamewire.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domainrecord.info/whois/domainnamewire.com"&gt;DomainNameWire.com&lt;/a&gt;'s &lt;a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/04/domain-auction-site-bido-closing-down/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/04/domain-auction-site-bido-closing-down/"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Record Information</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/bido.com#comment-723168986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Bido.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bido.com"&gt;Bido.com&lt;/a&gt;, the domain auction site, is closing today May 5, 2010. That&amp;amp;#039s according to a tweet on &lt;a href="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=twitter.com"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;, from yesterday - May 4, 2010:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bido is ceasing operation as of May 5, 2010. All transactions and accounts will be gracefully finalized and closed.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The company has been in existence since early 2008. Unfortunately, after changing it&amp;amp;#039s auction model a hand full of times, it has not been successful in finding a winning formula for revenue growth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is some more information and some interesting comments at &lt;a href="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=domainnamewire.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http:\/\/domainrecord.info\/index.php\?query=domainnamewire.com"&gt;DomainNameWire.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;amp;#039s &lt;a href="http:\/\/domainnamewire.com\/2010\/05\/04\/domain-auction-site-bido-closing-down\/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http:\/\/domainnamewire.com\/2010\/05\/04\/domain-auction-site-bido-closing-down\/"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ToyBots: The Stealth Prototype</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/18/toybots-the-stealth-prototype/#comment-71665999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, Michael, that was hilarious. Well, at least ToyBots' CEO has sense of humor. Good for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:10:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The .CM Scam &amp;#8211; What was enom Thinking???</title><link>http://morganlinton.com/the-cm-scam-what-was-enom-thinking/#comment-399152212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, that is really bad. I wonder why this rule is in place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hotel-reservation.com Domain Record Info</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/hotel-reservation.com#comment-727338874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with what Ron Jackson had to say i the beginning of his post. Personally I have only 2 or 3 hyphenated domains. As a US domainer, for some reason, look down on the hyphenated domains, even though I know of some great sites whose domain names are hyphenated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suppose it makes no difference if the domain name is hyphenated as long as there is a developed site behind it and it is producing good content, gaining and retaining visitor traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hotel-reservation.com Domain Record Info</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/whois/hotel-reservation.com#comment-723168984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with what Ron Jackson had to say i the beginning of his post. Personally I have only 2 or 3 hyphenated domains. As a US domainer, for some reason, look down on the hyphenated domains, even though I know of some great sites whose domain names are hyphenated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suppose it makes no difference if the domain name is hyphenated as long as there is a developed site behind it and it is producing good content, gaining and retaining visitor traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hotel-reservation.com Domain Record Info</title><link>http://domainrecord.info/index.php?query=hotel-reservation.com#comment-27320696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with what Ron Jackson had to say i the beginning of his post. Personally I have only 2 or 3 hyphenated domains. As a US domainer, for some reason, look down on the hyphenated domains, even though I know of some great sites whose domain names are hyphenated.    I suppose it makes no difference if the domain name is hyphenated as long as there is a developed site behind it and it is producing good content, gaining and retaining visitor traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+Acquires+reCaptcha+To+Power+Scanning+For+Google+Books+And+Google%26nbsp%3BNews</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/16/google-acquires-recaptcha-to-power-scanning-for-google-books-and-google-news/#comment-71660523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol, not to mention that you also misspelled grammar in a comment excusing poor grammar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+Acquires+reCaptcha+To+Power+Scanning+For+Google+Books+And+Google%26nbsp%3BNews</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/16/google-acquires-recaptcha-to-power-scanning-for-google-books-and-google-news/#comment-71660517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;reCaptcha is already free!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+Acquires+reCaptcha+To+Power+Scanning+For+Google+Books+And+Google%26nbsp%3BNews</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/16/google-acquires-recaptcha-to-power-scanning-for-google-books-and-google-news/#comment-71660514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only did they choose not to reinvent the wheel, but now they won't have to do any marketing or pushing a new product. reCaptcha is already on a huge number of web sites, as well as it is being used by large social sites. It is cheaper for them to acquire not only the technology but also the presence on all of those sites and the organic traffic they have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MG Explains Why ISPs Want To Lower The Definition Of Broadband</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/mg-explains-why-isps-want-to-lower-the-definition-of-broadband/#comment-71619772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If other services can't function properly except for their own then they are creating a monopoly. Although it will be hard to get the telcos for monopoly because they will still be "allowing" for third party services to access their network. There will be more success on the unfair practices and fair market front. Although line/network access rights and costs have been disputed, for years, between telcos, the FCC and third party provider.  It might be too late if the telcos are successful with this. I fear it might take years to undo what could have easily been prevented/regulated by the FCC, or higher government agencies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The free market is nice, but it needs to be protected. Some times that is done through regulating parts of it. To keep the US competitive with other countries other, that the FCC, government bodies might need to become involved as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thetitan.titanfusion.net/archive/2008/08/01/comcast-gets-owned-by-the-fcc-well-sort-of/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thetitan.titanfusion.net/archive/2008/08/01/comcast-gets-owned-by-the-fcc-well-sort-of/"&gt;http://thetitan.titanfusion...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:35:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MG Explains Why ISPs Want To Lower The Definition Of Broadband</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/mg-explains-why-isps-want-to-lower-the-definition-of-broadband/#comment-71619745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is part of the whole Net Neutrality issue. Consumers do not understand and know how many of the services they use and depend on depend on broadband, the internet and fast delivery of information. More needs to be done to make the net neutrality issue better know/understood by consumers and to encourage more participation on their part.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MG Explains Why ISPs Want To Lower The Definition Of Broadband</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/mg-explains-why-isps-want-to-lower-the-definition-of-broadband/#comment-71619742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess more people will have to give up on watching youtube and actually go outside and do something productive and healthy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People+Of+Walmart%2C+Some+Of+You+Should+Look+In+The+Mirror+Before+You+Walk+Out+The%26nbsp%3BDoor</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/people-of-walmart-some-of-you-should-look-in-the-mirror-before-you-walk-out-the-door/#comment-71619010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't say it was "breackign news" or that it was presented as "breaking news". TechCrunch isn't a "breaking news" site!! TechCrunch reviews and reports on events, businesses, services and sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice, though, to not see things that are stupid and OLD, posted on TC. Especialy about sites like &lt;a href="http://peopleofwalmart.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="peopleofwalmart.com"&gt;peopleofwalmart.com&lt;/a&gt;, unless it has something to do with a grand plan, technology behind it or finances. When Michael posted about &lt;a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="icanhascheezburger.com"&gt;icanhascheezburger.com&lt;/a&gt; it was about the actual company and specualtiosn about their revenue - you know - things of substance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't have a problem with this post if I saw it on CrunchGear. I am use to seeing ones like this one published there!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:29:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People+Of+Walmart%2C+Some+Of+You+Should+Look+In+The+Mirror+Before+You+Walk+Out+The%26nbsp%3BDoor</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/people-of-walmart-some-of-you-should-look-in-the-mirror-before-you-walk-out-the-door/#comment-71618861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish Techcrunch staff staid more up to date on what is happening on the Internet and didn't report on sites, and events like they are something new! For example google store and &lt;a href="http://peopleofwalmart.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="peopleofwalmart.com"&gt;peopleofwalmart.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When Michael was the main poster, he seem to manage staying more current to the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You guys should try tools like &lt;a href="http://twitturly.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitturly.com/"&gt;http://twitturly.com/&lt;/a&gt; to keep up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elephant Attacks Tech Legend Tom Siebel (And Gets Away With It)</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/elephant-attacks-tech-legend-tom-siebel-and-gets-away-with-it/#comment-71617202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[...] was attacked [...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I'm reading, you are writing about more than ONE persons. It should be - were attacked!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF%2C+Google+Sells+Company+Merchandise%26nbsp%3BOnline%3F</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/02/wtf-google-sells-company-merchandise-online/#comment-71606871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, you guys are really behind. The store has been available for years. It just is tucked in the site, instead of being front and center. It makes sense when it isn't the main source of revenue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But seriously, you guys and gals should spend 15 to 20 minutes exploring (corporate) sites. You will be amazed what you might find.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you look hard enough you might even find the Google photo gallery.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Belgian teenager latest victim of exploding iPhone phenomenon</title><link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/08/28/belgian-teenager-latest-victim-of-exploding-iphone-phenomenon/#comment-127372484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So the phone seized to exist in this realm by *imploding* onto itself!! I'm surprised that he has a headache, instead of his hand and head getting sucked IN during the IMplosion! lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Begun, The Phone Wars Have (soon) (humor)</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/21/begun-the-phone-wars-have-soon-humor/#comment-71557838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;baseball bats sounds good, so does running them over with the Segway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Begun, The Phone Wars Have (soon) (humor)</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/21/begun-the-phone-wars-have-soon-humor/#comment-71557751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huuhhhh, Michael, I missed the point of that video. I was expecting to see something happen to the phones, or at leased to the life size walkign advertisement costumes, but I end up watching a commercial for YouRenew!! Are we to expect more?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Gets Another New Design!</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/20/twitter-gets-another-new-design/#comment-71553710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol, i get this problems once a week or so, and I have been experiencing them for the last couple of months. Usually I attribute them to lousy rendering of the page by the browser, with some help from the corporate firewall/filters. Usually hitting F5 coupe of times, to reload the age, resolves the rendering issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandar Tzanov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:47:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>