<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thefoodgeek</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-6933e69e" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/thefoodgeek/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:20:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who owns that&amp;nbsp;recipe? -  Journal - The Food Geek</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/blog/2008/11/22/who-owns-that-recipe.html#comment-22678331</link><description>Hi, Aaron,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's no surefire way to reverse engineer a recipe from the final food. You might be able to guess, or use your experience to know it tastes just like something you're used to but with an extra bit of tarragon or similar, but you can't take it to a lab, have them tear apart the flavor compounds, and give you a recipe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, if you asked them for a recipe, or you did something underhanded like bribe a current or former cook, or you did something illegal like break into their house for the recipe (presuming it's written down), then you could publish that. Of course, you might have to deal with whatever consequences there could be for how you got a hold of the recipe, but that's neither here nor there (please don't break into their home).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The important thing, though, is that the mom and pop should want to tell people about their amazing food. There's a lot of benefit to sharing knowledge, and I encourage everyone to jump in and share.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cleaning&amp;nbsp;trout -  Journal - The Food Geek</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/blog/cleaning-trout.html#comment-17031843</link><description>Oh, yes, I loved Asheville. If I ever need to move from Charlottesville, Asheville will be on the list of alternate places.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andrea, we were under a bit of a time crunch, otherwise we would have seen the rest of the process as well. However, we had a cooking competition to get to, so we couldn't spend much more time at the trout farm. I fear that my ability to clean a trout is limited to what was in the video, especially as I don't have the filleting machine, but it's a step.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:03:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cleaning&amp;nbsp;trout -  Journal - The Food Geek</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/blog/cleaning-trout.html#comment-16847354</link><description>I am pleased to report that none of the bloggers managed to slice their own hands open. Thank goodness.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This week on Fine Cooking: Basil and Lettuce 2-for-1</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/news/this-week-on-fine-cooking-basil-and-lettuce-2-for-1#comment-12596655</link><description>Thanks, Alison!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's funny, I'm so much more creative when I'm giving examples of how to be creative than when I'm, for example, deciding what to make for dinner. It's like I should follow my own advice or something. Crazy talk, I know, but I'm a crazy guy sometimes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:00:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baking pan conversions&amp;#8230;yay!</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/technique/baking-pan-conversionsyay#comment-12449379</link><description>No reason why not, Coco.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cider</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/cider#comment-12263008</link><description>Testing out a disqus comment as a tweet for &lt;a href="http://thefoodgeek.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;thefoodgeek.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dealing with living food</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/technique/dealing-with-living-food#comment-7935291</link><description>Good point on the sous vide. The other nice thing about it is that you don't have to worry about water getting into the food that you're sousing vide. My understanding is that it's somewhat tricky to get good results with vegetables in sous vide, but as you say, experimenting could be worth it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those interested in more info on the sous vide, you might want to check out the post I did for fine cooking on the topic. &lt;a href="http://www.finecooking.com/item/7701/sous-vide-or-bust" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.finecooking.com/item/7701/sous-vide-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fine Cooking Thursday: Sunken Sourdough Sadness</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/news/fine-cooking-thursday-sunken-sourdough-sadness#comment-7556439</link><description>There's a little bit of yeast in all of us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7312490</link><description>Cool. I've gotten through the intros on the book, and so I've looked through the recipes. I'm a little dismayed that they didn't at least include weighed measurements for their ingredients.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7289011</link><description>Certainly worth a try. I'll be trying out some of those recipes soon, so if I find something that's not terribly tough, I'll let you know which one. What brand flour are you using?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7287823</link><description>With ABin5, were you using a southern AP flour? I'm not that far into it, but I'm given to understand that it more or less requires such a thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, as you have the baker lifestyle internalized, clearly you don't ned it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:49:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7259055</link><description>Absolutely. I will order it immediately. I should have thought of that, as I am following Zoe on Twitter. Silly me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7256697</link><description>Yeah, that's a good variation on what King Arthur suggests. It works better if there isn't anything perishable in the dough, but I think even if there's butter in it that it should be fine for 8 or 9 hours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:19:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7255740</link><description>So: Wake up early, take dough out of fridge, check news, exercise, bake, write blog entry, remove from oven, go to work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, ideally I should allow the bread to cool for an hour before wrapping it up. Do I just leave it out, confident that it will be fine?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:39:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeast Bread and schedule balancing</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/yeast-bread-and-schedule-balancing#comment-7246869</link><description>I don't know why I still have not made a no-knead bread. It's been on the list to do for forever now. Okay, I will try that. Thank you for the suggestions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Incidentally, in case anyone was worried, the bread I made this evening turned out lovely, even if it was a bit sticky before I let it do its initial rise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tomato T-Shirt… for nerds!</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/equipment/tomato-t-shirt%e2%80%a6-for-nerds#comment-7098100</link><description>It's made of dreams and, er… magic. Yup.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fine Cooking Thursday: Like syrup for candy</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/news/fine-cooking-thursday-like-syrup-for-candy#comment-7098091</link><description>Heh. Mostly because it was kind of a weak metaphor. My testers didn't think it was too shocking or anything, but it wasn't really as solidly-based as it should have been.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Italian Soffrito</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/technique/italian-soffrito#comment-7098064</link><description>Thanks, and welcome! I'm sure I will be forever "scarred" by my Italian cooking experience, never quite being able to take it as seriously as had I gone to France first. Still, I'll enjoy myself even so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:52:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contest: Cupcake v. Muffin, Round 1: Toppings</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/contest-cupcake-v-muffin-round-1-toppings#comment-6897252</link><description>You're good. You have an account, you're logged in with it. Just add your recipe here like you asked that question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contest: Cupcake v. Muffin, Round 1: Toppings</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/contest-cupcake-v-muffin-round-1-toppings#comment-6304203</link><description>Which brings up a good point that I will now clarify: I need a complete recipe for a cupcake or a muffin that includes a topping. I will modify the contest description to indicate this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The mystery of the moister cake</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/the-mystery-of-the-moister-cake#comment-6203856</link><description>A quick note here: table sugar is only mildly hygroscopic. Brown sugar, honey, and others are much more so. Depending on the content of the baked good, you will have a better chance pulling moisture into your tasty treat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:39:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use Electricity to Turn Cheap Wine into Decent Wine</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/technique/use-electricity-to-turn-cheap-wine-into-decent-wine#comment-5137879</link><description>You  make a good point. I suppose what I'm hoping for is that there is a class of wines that have great potential, but due to manufacturing costs and so on, they don't bother with much of the aging process, and just release it on the cheap. But, as you imply, a winemaker who doesn't bother to age to the proper point for that wine is probably not going to do a particularly good job with the grape selection and blending as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kindle for the Food Enthusiast</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/equipment/kindle-for-the-food-enthusiast#comment-5064310</link><description>It is definitely worth it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Cheese</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/food/making-cheese#comment-5032896</link><description>Ooh, and a ginger ale as well, you say? I am so far behind on projects I need to do this year. This weekend I'd best do something worthwhile.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Food Geek Is Now in Fine Cooking</title><link>http://thefoodgeek.com/news/the-food-geek-is-now-in-fine-cooking#comment-4923152</link><description>Thanks, Deborah. I'm a big fan myself, even before they knew about me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thefoodgeek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>