<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thePajamaPundit</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/thePajamaPundit/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:06:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Digging Out, Literally</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/digging_out_literally/#comment-27993207</link><description>Indeed Vast. But, the cynic in me says "I bet he did it for some free publicity that is positive".  I know.  I am awful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simply Having A Wonderful Christmas Time</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/simply_having_a_wonderful_christmas_time/#comment-27460881</link><description>Thanks! We just renovated.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:23:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America Doesn't Need Obama to Play Captain Save'em After Terror Attempt</title><link>http://brownmanthinkinghard.disqus.com/america_doesnt_need_obama_to_play_captain_saveem_after_terror_attempt/#comment-27436320</link><description>Disqus is working well Brown Man. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fantastic post -- great points all around.  I'll likely be linking to it tomorrow -- if I get to posting.  The holidays have me all turned around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway. Keep up the good work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Theme</title><link>http://vastvariety.disqus.com/new_theme/#comment-27376033</link><description>Lookin' good Vast!  I love the new theme.  I'm still working on a re-design of my own... maybe after the new year I'll reveal it.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: A Whole Lot Of Switchin' Goin' On</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/breaking_a_whole_lot_of_switchin_goin_on/#comment-27195618</link><description>You raise a great point Fit. The Republican party did (and still &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt;) refer to Arlen Specter as "Benedict Arlen".  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, I think there is a contributor to this very site who refers to him in that manner... although lately he is nowhere to be found.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:47:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happiness Is...</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/happiness_is_03/#comment-26260488</link><description>Indeed it is Tracey!  All of the photography under the '&lt;a href="http://www.thepajamapundit.com/search/label/Happiness%20Is" rel="nofollow"&gt;Happiness Is&lt;/a&gt;' tag was shot by me and features my kids (or my family).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Whole 'Liberal Media Bias' Thingie</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/that_whole_liberal_media_bias_thingie/#comment-26227645</link><description>Also, as far as KO's rant is concerned, he has the premise wrong...again.  Conservatives don't gripe about not having any media presence, they gripe about not having any mainstream media presence.  Just as he lists all the conservative commentators who don't pretend that they are anything but conservative, I can list a bunch of liberal reporters with liberal bias in their reporting (which you seem to agree with): Katie Couric, Dan Rather, Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, even all the way back to Walter Cronkite, at least.  These people DO pretend that they are unbiased, and that's where the difference is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cubbiechuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Whole 'Liberal Media Bias' Thingie</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/that_whole_liberal_media_bias_thingie/#comment-26171468</link><description>Damn!  Why do I have to log in again every time I want to make a comment?  Am I doing something wrong?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it was ratings that got rewarded, he would have received more than astonishment for his Scaring to Death special.  And, I could be wrong, but I don't think people eating bugs won any awards.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cubbiechuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Whole 'Liberal Media Bias' Thingie</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/that_whole_liberal_media_bias_thingie/#comment-26170958</link><description>You make several great points cubbie, and I &lt;em&gt;wish&lt;/em&gt; that people would do their own investigating and decision making.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, to your point about Olby's rant, I don't think that his point was/is quite the same as mine.  As I understood it, Olbermann is saying that there is definitely a conservative voice in the media (as he aptly reiterates nearly 742 times).  My point is parallel to that, but expands to include all media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the Stossel angle is concerned, I think that it is not &lt;em&gt;liberalism&lt;/em&gt; that is 'rewarded' by the mainstream media -- rather it is &lt;em&gt;ratings&lt;/em&gt; that are rewarded.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If watching people eat bugs got ratings, then shows that feature that would get more attention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, wait...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comment Of The Day</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/comment_of_the_day/#comment-25956351</link><description>lol, yes it was sarcasm. I was in one of &lt;i&gt;those&lt;/i&gt; moods.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's sad is, I can almost see her point. Not that I agree with it, but I understand her logic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't believe I said that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-18968050</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Whole 'Liberal Media Bias' Thingie</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/that_whole_liberal_media_bias_thingie/#comment-25944644</link><description>Who? Me?  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comment Of The Day</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/comment_of_the_day/#comment-25899755</link><description>The irony is that (most) Republicans seem rational when compared to this kind of nasty-ass blood-spilling revolutionary rhetoric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and I sincerely hope that nipples comment was sarcasm...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:13:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'The Slammin' Salmon'</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/the_slammin_salmon/#comment-25821881</link><description>I can watch people chop other peoples heads off, every body part fly every which way in a movie, it doesnt bother me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But when I watch them chug the syrup, I almost barf each time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-18968050</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:29:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'The Slammin' Salmon'</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/the_slammin_salmon/#comment-25808471</link><description>Indeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I am all that is man."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Annise Parker Wins Mayoral Election</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/annise_parker_wins_mayoral_election/#comment-25749501</link><description>Fixed. Thanks Vast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:07:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man 2</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/iron_man_2/#comment-25539369</link><description>I think favreau is up for it. I can't wait to find out. He did an amazing job with the first.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's funny to see that insane guy from 'The Replacements' as a great director. Heh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-18968050</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man 2</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/iron_man_2/#comment-25525080</link><description>Abso-friggin'-lutely.  I like both Howard and Cheadle -- so I can go either way.  But the War Machine is a great storyline and should make for an &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt; movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope Favreau is up to it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:11:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Tiger Backlash</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/more_tiger_backlash/#comment-25462764</link><description>I agree with the hypocrisy issues, but has Tiger done anything besides create an aura of professionalism on the golf course? It is the public that has placed him on that pedestal. (Just my two cents)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandra Ames</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Tiger Backlash</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/more_tiger_backlash/#comment-25462441</link><description>Hi Alexandra!  I agree that we should let Tiger work out his personal stuff.  The only reason I ever &lt;em&gt;favor&lt;/em&gt; this type of coverage is when it is an individual who exhibits blatant hypocrisy (for example, a minister who preaches about the evils of infidelity and then participates in an extramarital affair).  This is why I am a bit hesitant to post these things about Woods...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for commenting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Frosty The Inappropriate Snowman'</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/frosty_the_inappropriate_snowman/#comment-25184264</link><description>Yes. You do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:50:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows' Trailer</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/harry_potter_and_the_deathly_hallows_trailer/#comment-25184194</link><description>Thanks for stopping by Andy!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree -- I wish they hadn't split the flick into two separate films.  But, if they had not done so, the final movie may well have been over 5 hours long (not that I wouldn't have sat through it!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Department Of Unnecessary Headlines</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/department_of_unnecessary_headlines/#comment-25135710</link><description>Unnecessary because I really just didn't want to know. How is this 'new information' news?  Ugh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Happens To Your Pet After The Rapture?</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/what_happens_to_your_pet_after_the_rapture/#comment-24789791</link><description>Thanks for your comments Susan!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do see your point -- but the same could be said for those Evangelical pastors who &lt;em&gt;claim&lt;/em&gt; to be able to heal folks by simply shoving them on the forehead.  Granted, the parishioners are not &lt;em&gt;required&lt;/em&gt; to pay for the 'service' provided, but I would venture a guess that many of them do donate money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I posted this because I thought it was an interesting story.  Nobody is getting hurt by what Mr. Centre is doing.  Nobody is being forced or coerced into giving him money. He has made it very clear that he does &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; believe in the Rapture, so I don't see where he is 'conning' anyone.  He is simply taking advantage of a market demographic that &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; believe that the Rapture will happen -- and wants someone to take care of their pet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whether or not you agree with his business practices is beside the point -- he has a right to provide his 'service' to Christians the same way that we have a right to provide religious programs to 'save' atheists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by and sharing your opinion!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For All The Single Ladies...</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/for_all_the_single_ladies/#comment-24724488</link><description>I think that her eyes are a positive feature. They seem to draw you in...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'I Love The Smell Of Commerce In The Morning'</title><link>http://thepajamapundit.disqus.com/i_love_the_smell_of_commerce_in_the_morning/#comment-24696957</link><description>Hey n8wine, thanks for commenting!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I presume that 'Wall Street' is your answer for the Exit Question... the correct answer would be '&lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113749/quotes" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mallrats&lt;/a&gt;'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Snoochie boochies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>