<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thePajamaPundit</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-805391bc" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/thePajamaPundit/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:28:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Auto-Tune The Puke</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/auto-tune-puke.html#comment-24181875</link><description>Uhh... come out where?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Annnnnd... it's GONE.  Outta here.  See ya spammer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Earth with Rings</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/earth-with-rings.html#comment-24089700</link><description>Dammit Vast!  I had this YouTubey-goodness bookmarked.  I was going to post it sometime next week -- and you beat me to it!  Aaaargh!  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Health Care Reform In The Senate</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/health-care-reform-in-senate.html#comment-23965535</link><description>Exit question: how narrow can Vast &amp; Fury make the comments column?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get a room you two.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:07:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America:  The Debt-Ridden Land of Pointy Partisan Fingers</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/53573/america-the-debt-ridden-land-of-pointy-partisan-fingers/#comment-23627707</link><description>I completely agree that solutions and compromise to fix our problems are what is needed right now.  I would absolutely love it if all of the partisan hackery were to completely disappear from our political discourse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BUT, all of the folks in Congress (okay, &lt;em&gt;MOST&lt;/em&gt; folks in Congress) start their day by looking out for themselves, no?  To do that, compromising and 'reaching across the aisle' are toxic actions.  As soon as a Republican does that, some folks wearing three-pointed-hats show up with signs calling said Republican a 'RINO' or a 'socialist-commie-pinko'.  Democrats who attempt to work with Republicans find themselves the targets of the über-liberal wing of their party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call me a pessimist (or a &lt;em&gt;realist&lt;/em&gt;), but compromise and solutions do not seem to get you re-elected.  I wish they did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fort Hood Is Proof For More Muslim Soldiers</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/fort-hood-is-proof-for-more-muslim.html#comment-23248417</link><description>Touché.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hard Wuerk</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/hard-wuerk_12.html#comment-22893480</link><description>And your point is....?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that your 'it seems that liberal men are effeminate and think illogically like chix' is a vague and incorrect generalization.  Are you saying that all 'chix' think illogically?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps Condoleezza Rice and Margaret Thatcher are illogical thinkers?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And all liberal men are 'effeminate'?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Bono is effeminate.  So is George Clooney.  How about Tom Hanks, Eddie Vedder, Billie Joe Armstrong or Jack Nicholson?  I'm sure that you think that they are all effeminate (as if that even matters).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to say Freemon, I appreciate you coming here and commenting.  I respect your opinion.  But I have to say that, while it is clear to me that you are a conservative, I'm not sure how your comment relates to either the cartoon in the post, or Vast's comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could you clarify your position?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Obama To Hold 'Jobs Summit'</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/breaking-obama-to-hold-jobs-summit.html#comment-22839974</link><description>Doug should have been on your blog list long ago Fury.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Beck Loses</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/glenn-beck-loses.html#comment-22704565</link><description>I &lt;em&gt;hate&lt;/em&gt; the way that URL messes up the text justification in the blockquote.  Natch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You've Got To Be Kidding Me</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/youve-got-to-be-kidding-me.html#comment-22704537</link><description>Doug, I couldn't have said it better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I said in my post, I respect Congressman King's decision to attend the vote instead of a family wedding.  If he felt it that important, so be it (I would have attended the wedding any day).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What bothers me is that he &lt;em&gt;politicized&lt;/em&gt; the affair.  He not only skipped his son's wedding, he then cracked that gem about his voting 'no' on the bill being the 'best gift he could give his son'.  GROAN.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder what his constituents think of that move?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption This!</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/caption-this.html#comment-21931589</link><description>Person on left: "BOOO!"&lt;br&gt;Person on right: "I'm 'booing' too, just not as enthusiastically!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:59:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote Of The Day</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/quote-of-day.html#comment-21752245</link><description>It's the Nancy Pelosi principle: Talk some smack about high-profile members of the opposition party to rile up your supporters (or people whom you'd like to have as supporters).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sarah Palin may be popular with the base of the GOP, but she is a highly dubious figure to many in the center (and on the left too).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Basically, she is a great punching bag for Dems the same way that Speaker Pelosi is for Republicans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote Of The Day</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/11/quote-of-day.html#comment-21701726</link><description>A good question cubbie.  From what I can tell, Palin has been brought into the NY23 conversation via her endorsement of Doug Hoffman.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beggar's Night</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/beggars-night.html#comment-21360442</link><description>That. Is. Awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:27:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birther Watch, Ctd.</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/birther-watch-ctd_29.html#comment-21290223</link><description>As far as I know, the Articles of Impeachment are handled by the Congress -- a la President Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, whether or not those Articles are appropriate for a 'fraudulently elected president' is another debate...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:40:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Got Me</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/it-got-me.html#comment-21263223</link><description>Id our towd, Halloweed is all about the parade. So, we do Trick-Or-Treat dight on a differedt dight of the week.  Todight is ToT dight, toborrow is Halloweed party day at school, and Saturday is Halloweed parade and pubpkid carving with other kids!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: Sarah Palin's Pie</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/open-thread-sarah-palins-pie.html#comment-21231192</link><description>Vast, any and all future crimes that you may or may not commit are forgiven because you quoted Cake. Nicely done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:09:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: Sarah Palin's Pie</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/open-thread-sarah-palins-pie.html#comment-21209523</link><description>Exactly. So make something up...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Karzai's Brother</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/karzais-brother.html#comment-21198413</link><description>I'm not necessarily saying that we should (or can) get out of Afghanistan.  I'm simply saying that as long as we police the world, there will be situations such as this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'This Week'</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/this-week.html#comment-21056952</link><description>Good point IP.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote Of The Day</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/quote-of-day_26.html#comment-21056781</link><description>Yes cubbie. Yes it is.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I've Got Lots Of Clean Teeth</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/ive-got-lots-of-clean-teeth.html#comment-20923668</link><description>Ugh. Sorry to hear it. May the Force be with you...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote Of The Day</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/quote-of-day_20.html#comment-20649525</link><description>I completely agree with your point about folks who would say similar things about any GOP President cubbiechuck.  But that doesn't make what Glenn Beck is saying okay.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Suggesting that Obama will smack you or crush you if you 'disobey him' is insane.  If that were true, Beck would no longer have a show, no?  Just because the President is encouraging people to volunteer does not equal a threat of Communism in America. Or Marxism.  Come on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I feel that I should note that I do not &lt;em&gt;hate&lt;/em&gt; Glenn Beck.  Rather, I vehemently oppose a lot of what he says.  I feel that he is cultivating a very dangerous rhetoric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Postscript: Since when do news commentators cite Ashton Kutcher as proof positive that their wild political theories are coming to fruition?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Return Of 'The-Rock Obama'</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/return-of-rock-obama.html#comment-20501887</link><description>Yeah, I had a difficult time choosing between this sketch, the &lt;em&gt;300&lt;/em&gt; DADT sketch and &lt;a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/102970/saturday-night-live-update-tamara-parks#s-p1-sr-i4" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tamara Parks on Weekend Update&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Bible As Justification For Violence</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/bible-as-justification-for-violence.html#comment-20499291</link><description>But it is a contradiction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think of it this way -- the Ten Commandments appear in the Old Testament.  They are still considered law in the New Testament, no?  Ergo, if the Old Testament says 'no tattoos' and in the New Testament Jesus 'overturns' law, it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; contradictory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While the Old Testament was written by and for Hebrews, Christians have adopted it as a key part of their belief system, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Bible As Justification For Violence</title><link>http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2009/10/bible-as-justification-for-violence.html#comment-20497885</link><description>Thanks for your comment Lou!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What would you say to Christians who believe that every word of the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is 100% truth?  How would one reconcile that the Old Testament contradicts the New in some areas?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePajamaPundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>