<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for stuartma</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-87df93e6" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/stuartma/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:31:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Inflation in Real Life</title><link>http://gregor.us/inflation/inflation-in-real-life/#comment-7643704</link><description>I think you are right re CAD/USD Gregor. Both the spending/sovereign debt spree in the US, especially compared to Canada's blissfully boring (for once that's a good thing) situation, together with Canada's energy position would seem to support that in the medium term. Personally, as a Canadian resident, I have taken the opportunity to move as much USD denominated fixed income securities into CAD while the exchange rate was at it's weakest several months ago. So, putting my money where my mouth is, as it were.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Love your thinking, as always.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Coasters Should Go To #mesh09</title><link>http://drewmack.com/2009/03/24/why-coasters-should-go-to-mesh09/#comment-7476315</link><description>Dude, I'm from Halifax. Just sayin' :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:31:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The great depression&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=163#comment-7136998</link><description>Love it Andy :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: The personal becomes public</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/02/13/twitter-the-personal-becomes-public/#comment-6239753</link><description>Well put 'thewie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Down from the Highs of Happiness</title><link>http://gregor.us/crisis/down-from-the-highs-of-happiness/#comment-4329507</link><description>Of course, this time period also covers Bush"s term in office. Just sayin'...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:56:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Down from the Highs of Happiness</title><link>http://gregor.us/crisis/down-from-the-highs-of-happiness/#comment-4329174</link><description>Maybe when Prince said "tonight we're gonna party like it's 1999" he was right :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As always, love your thinking Gregor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Global Industrialism and Oil&amp;#8217;s Price Envelope</title><link>http://gregor.us/non-opec/global-industrialism-and-oils-price-envelope/#comment-4179237</link><description>Gregor, fascinating stuff. I'm very glad that I connected to you via Paul on twitter. I've become a regular reader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Stuart&lt;br&gt;(@stuartma)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Personal note: A job change for yours truly</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/03/personal-note-a-job-change-for-yours-truly/#comment-3487092</link><description>I'm having a bit of trouble getting past the "Climbing Christie Blatchford" challenge, but other than that, I'm happy for you ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wishing you much success, 'thewie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stu</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop Being Bearish</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=3917#comment-3389629</link><description>Great post Howard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google needs to mind its own business</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/07/google-needs-to-mind-its-own-business/#comment-2917391</link><description>NICE :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:12:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: A Rick Sanchez greatest hits mashup</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/25/video-a-rick-sanchez-greatest-hits-mashup/#comment-2643527</link><description>'thewie that is just hilarious. Thanks for posting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:54:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yammer: This thing is a prize winner?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/11/yammer-this-thing-is-a-prize-winner/#comment-2293930</link><description>I agree 'thewie. A bit of a head scratcher. But it sure gets folks talking, hey? :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:01:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not everything needs to be auctioned</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/03/not-everything-needs-to-be-auctioned/#comment-588963</link><description>'thewie:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you, um, nailed it with the "not everything is a nail" comment, and I for one am not surprised that they are seeing huge growth in the "But it now" service. In fact, we can see similar trends in other - big - categories. For instance, Priceline has become much more successful after their near-death experience that helped drive them to offer fixed-price travel services in addition to the auction style. When I was running marketing at Expedia, we wondered whether it would be successful, especially given that PCLN had invested so much in teaching their customers that they were an auction site, as well as the the hoo-haa about their "business system patent" or whatever. Personally, I liked their odds - they could draft on their huge reach and supplier relationships to offer "good enough" pricing without the hassle of the auction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The flipside is that when &lt;a href="http://Expedia.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Expedia.com&lt;/a&gt; in the US tried to offer auction-style pricing for flights it flat-out did not work. Now there could be lots of reasons for that, but basically Expedia customers weren't interested. Which in part led to the acquisition of Hotwire. Different problem - different solution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tripharbor.com: Full speed ahead</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/tripharborcom-full-speed-ahead/#comment-380197</link><description>Thanks Mathew. The ship has left drydock etc. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Question Does Your Product Answer?</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/questions/purpose-of-product/#comment-294831</link><description>That is absolutely and completely accurate. Very well put. Solving problems for people and making their lives better in some way is really the only business model that there is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Duncan Riley: Lessons in diplomacy</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/15/duncan-riley-lessons-in-diplomacy/#comment-235374</link><description>Back a day and already a post with 43 comments. You should vacation more often, 'thewie ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The big deal: My link-o-rama</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/the-big-deal-my-link-o-rama/#comment-118654</link><description>Great round-up 'thewie. Thanks for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barcodes: Really clever or really dumb?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/29/barcodes-really-clever-or-really-dumb/#comment-110393</link><description>Stunningly bad. I get the theory, but as you point out, it feels very 1998 to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to buy everything, cure cancer</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/google-to-buy-everything-cure-cancer/#comment-95192</link><description>'thewie, I disagree. I think you should *totally* buy the Eiffel tower.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TripHarbor cruises into the travel market</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/19/tripharbor-cruises-into-the-travel-market/#comment-88132</link><description>Thanks for the great post, 'thewie. Travel geek? Aye aye :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calacanis: You have to be a &amp;#8220;player&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/02/calacanis-you-have-to-be-a-player/#comment-55916</link><description>Saying that you can be successful at something without clear means to profitability has to be the stupidest f***ing thing I've heard in a long time. Idiotic. But then, that's pretty much what I've come to expect from Calacanis. And, if you define "success" as getting as I suspect he does - by getting some other idiot to buy you - then I guess he might be right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doesn't make any of it a good business idea though. Sustainability has to be in there in my view.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are we doing when we Twitter?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/30/what-are-we-doing-when-we-twitter/#comment-55119</link><description>Great points, 'thewie. And I'm frankly still on the fence with twitter, although I'm warming to it in some ways. We recently had a health issue in our family, and during that I used twitter a lot. Why? Well, I wanted to share what was going on with (mostly actual) friends and I got a lot of good karma back. This was great I have to say. Now, I also had twitter linked to my Facebook status updates, and following this incident I've broken that link (not that I didn't get some nice messages from - again - actual friends who saw what was going on that way). To your continuum point, in looking at it afterwards, it was TMI in the Facebook context, and for the hundreds of "friends" I have on there may well have been cringe-worthy, if not downright creepy. So what works on twitter, especially short, immediate, on the go stuff, doesn't work elsewhere and elsewhere might even be too much period. Of course, my twittering during the health issue might have been too much anyway, but at the time I frankly didn't care and appreciated the instant feedback.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise: No one&amp;#8217;s heard of Google Docs</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/18/surprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs/#comment-41338</link><description>Heh. "Any" key.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>