<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for stephanmiller</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/stephanmiller/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:01:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/personalize-your-feeds-with-feedweaver.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_380/#comment-6867964</link><description>Your last link to FeedWeaver links to the wrong site. Just thought I'd let you know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make The Connection With Your Markets</title><link>http://cindyking.disqus.com/make_the_connection_with_your_markets/#comment-3441099</link><description>I do agree with you about GoDaddy.  And I guess, I'm happy I don't need to look for another hosting provider right now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CindyKing</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social|Median was not a good experience</title><link>http://cloudnotes.disqus.com/socialmedian_was_not_a_good_experience/#comment-1168058</link><description>I found the concept incredibly useful. Perhaps when they get it all worked out, I can reactivate my account. I'm just reporting my relatively poor first impression.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social|Median was not a good experience</title><link>http://cloudnotes.disqus.com/socialmedian_was_not_a_good_experience/#comment-1167253</link><description>I actually like it a little better than Friendfeed, because you have to actually choose something to clip rather than send the mass of your lifestream in one end and out the other. I don't know. SocialMedian just works for me, but I process a lot of data each day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make The Connection With Your Markets</title><link>http://cindyking.disqus.com/make_the_connection_with_your_markets/#comment-1157605</link><description>I have heard good and bad about GoDaddy. But I have had luck with them. Or let's just say, they don't bother me, I don't bother them, and nothing has broken yet. It is a pain trying to find the right hosting provider. I deal with three right now now. All decent. I have had some bad ones in the past though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whom Should You Remove From Your StumbleUpon Friends?</title><link>http://gobeyondmls.disqus.com/whom_should_you_remove_from_your_stumbleupon_friends_51/#comment-1125583</link><description>That figures. I have a lifetime sponsor status from being there before eBay, before nofollow, before tags when the community itself was still building the software. It was easy to be a top stumbler then and a few of us got the golden ticket. I am glad they took that off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whom Should You Remove From Your StumbleUpon Friends?</title><link>http://gobeyondmls.disqus.com/whom_should_you_remove_from_your_stumbleupon_friends_51/#comment-1122636</link><description>I guess my advise and the article are already outdated:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.stumbleupon.com/friends_fans_changes" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.stumbleupon.com/friends_fans_changes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I updated the post. Still think it is good idea to clean up your list even&lt;br&gt;if you are able to add more than 200 friends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by Stephan!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VladZablotskyy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:27:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whom Should You Remove From Your StumbleUpon Friends?</title><link>http://gobeyondmls.disqus.com/whom_should_you_remove_from_your_stumbleupon_friends_51/#comment-1121193</link><description>Actually, I just hit my limit today. Some of my friends have been on there five years. So it looks like I will be doing the same soon. That's a low limit. I thought being a sponsor got you past that. Guess not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Money Online - Best posts of the day - Jul 23 2008</title><link>http://metamakemoneyonline.disqus.com/make_money_online_best_posts_of_the_day_jul_23_2008_48/#comment-1036330</link><description>Thanks for the link love!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Obscured Art of Personal Blogging</title><link>http://dean-lozarie.disqus.com/the_obscured_art_of_personal_blogging/#comment-964622</link><description>I write about Making Money Online and everything that entails but I think for the most part, I am a personal blogger. I have niche blogs, but the blog with my name on it no longer has ads. It was a move to make it more personal. I figure this is the reason I went to blogging. I could have made money hiding behind the scenes, but I like writing. I stopped writing so much, because it was not paying the bills and was going nowhere. With a blog, my writing is doing something, at least, and I have an old friend back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephanmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:10:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Talk About Rules for Social Following Is Getting Out of Hand</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_the_talk_about_rules_for_social_following_is_getting_out_of_hand/#comment-957287</link><description>I usually filter all friend request emails from all my networks into one folder and then check has followed me to see if they are worth following back. I have run into some great bloggers who has worthless tweets and vice versa. I know I never follow just because someone else followed me and I don't expect the same.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:34:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The private messaging divide.</title><link>http://colinwalker.disqus.com/the_private_messaging_divide_09/#comment-799958</link><description>I agree that services shouldn't try to be all things to all people but, by the same token, I think there is a convincing argument for some form of basic functionality to avoid the need to go elsewhere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">colinwalker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The private messaging divide.</title><link>http://colinwalker.disqus.com/the_private_messaging_divide_09/#comment-798821</link><description>I think services like gnip and ping.fm are going to make a lot of sites not necessarily need other features because they will eventually make all sites with API pluggable. I for one recognize right away when a site is adding new features that other sites already do better to keep people there. One too many and the complexity gets to be too much. I like Twitter because it is simple and Friendfeed because of comments. I don't go to Amazon when I want to buy something at an auction. I go to Ebay. And I never go to a brick and mortar Walmart because in an effort to shove everything in, they eventually can't and must appeal to the lowest common denominator.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jangro.us</title><link>http://jangrous.disqus.com/jangrous_33/#comment-707536</link><description>done</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Continuous Parallel Attention: My New Reality</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_continuous_parallel_attention_my_new_reality/#comment-706389</link><description>This is about the same way I handle things and people ask me how I can get so much done in a day. I am glad you renamed it. Because by productivity guru's, it's known as multitasking and they give it a bad name. So I have tried to fight this lately. "I must learn to single task". But my productivity has dropped as a result. So back to Continuous Parallel Attention with Twitter scrolling in the sidebar, Snackr scrolling feeds below while I check Friendfeed. It is amazing what you can pick up in this way. Snackr has actually increased my commenting by being random. And I get a lot more worthwhile reading done. I do shut it all off to write posts at times, but rarely since for most of my posts I need reference material at hand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm with Rex (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/im_with_rex_scripting_news/#comment-42839</link><description>They are just aholes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>